Barak Obama Calls For National Health Care System

United States
January 25, 2007 2:09pm CST
While other presidential canidates have made promises concerning our nation's health care crisis that have not been fullfilled; I read this article thouroughly, and found that Barak Obama seems to be completly sincere in his desire to provide this country with a national healthcare system. "The time has come for universal health care in America," Obama said at a conference of Families USA, a health care advocacy group. "I am absolutely determined that by the end of the first term of the next president, we should have universal health care in this country," the Illinois senator said. Read the entire article here: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070125/ap_on_go_co/democrats_health_care_4 What do you think? What are your feelings about Obama's speech and healthcare coverage for everyone in the United States?
7 people like this
19 responses
• United States
25 Jan 07
As I originally come from the UK which has national healthcare I could never understand why such a powerful country at the USA did not. I believe every citizen should have free basic health care, including dental and vision care. Some people say it would take too long to get service we'd have to wait for hours. Well Many people would rather wait and get service than none at all. So my answer is yes.
4 people like this
• United States
25 Jan 07
My thoughts too whiteheather. If I were uninsured again, I would much rather have to wait hours to see a doctor and be able to if I needed it, than to not be able to see the doc at all. It is a give and take situation, as is just about everything anymore. I have always felt we need a system similar to that of the UK. Thank you so much for responding and your thoughts.
1 person likes this
@srhelmer (7029)
• Beaver Dam, Wisconsin
25 Jan 07
A couple of problems with this plan. 1. Name one government agency that performs efficiently. 2. Since there will be strict guidelines about patient care, the care itself might not be as good. 3. Part of the reason you see newer procedures and treatments being developed is the hospitals compete with each other for business. If you take that away, you might be losing future treatments for cancer and other ailments.
4 people like this
• United States
25 Jan 07
You make some valid points. Don't you think that in the last decade the level of healthcare in our country has declined? I am well aware that doctors and hospitals compete for business, but I don't think that it is necessarily good. The costs have skyrocketed and the "patient care" has reached an all time low. I really don't see how we would lose medical research, as that would still be funded by the government.
2 people like this
• United States
26 Jan 07
No thanks Mr. Obama and others. I work for a health care provider and have seen how great the government is in the respects of Medicare and Medicaid. I can only imagine what our health care system would look like after 5 or 10 years of a universal program. Also, one would wonder how much tax money this would cost?
2 people like this
• United States
31 Jan 07
Well said thewatchlist. Thank you very much.
• United States
27 Jan 07
People don't seem to understand that insurance isn't the same across the board. I know many providers who do not accept certain insurances due to extremely slow pay or other issues. While the government would likely not allow a provider to deny the government coverage, I can imagine that people with additional coverage would get some sort of preferential treatment. Then those who only had the government plan would be able to get treatment, but the would have to wait on extremely long waiting lists for major medical procedures (like what happens in some other countries with socialized plans)... Those people still basically go without the care they need. It just throws a kink in the system for those who can afford it and brings down the quality for all. Oh well though, our aspiring politicians seem to know best. Not that they have to worry because they have lifetime healthcare plans already...
1 person likes this
• United States
26 Jan 07
I agree with you. Your actual real world experience should count for something. I'm afraid it will not. When I made a similar arguement, the response I got was that people opposing socialized medicine have never had to live without insurance. This simply is not true and irrelevant to whether or not socialized medicine would be a good thing. Thanks, for expressing your opinion.
1 person likes this
@lpetges (3036)
• United States
25 Jan 07
where is this guy from anyway. i cant tell if he is black american, or indian, and are we all comfortable with someone that is possibly from a terrorists country? i never heard of him until recently.. as far as health concerns, Hilary Clinton has been on that band wagon for the last 3 years. Of course we need a national plan. But we also need many things at this point!
2 people like this
• United States
25 Jan 07
Obama is relitively new in the political arena. He is a Senator from Illinois. I almost cannot believe that you are inquiring as to his race/nationality, but I will respond. His father is black, his mother is white, and he grew up in Hawaii. He is all American. Yes, but Hillary Clinton hasn't done anything about it, except talk and neither did Bill when he was President. I will agree with you, that yes this country does need many things at this point. Thank you for replying. (I did rate a +, even though we have differing views.)
2 people like this
• United States
25 Jan 07
I know cremecheese. But everyone is entitled to their own opinion and he did answer the question. I try not to give people - unless their answers are short one liners, yes or no, make no sense, or violate the myLot rules. I wanted to make lpetges aware of that for some reason. Just because he/she is in the dark is no reason for me to - him. I thought the same thing, and had to read the response several times, before I typed my response.
3 people like this
• United States
25 Jan 07
What rock does that guy live under???
2 people like this
• United States
26 Jan 07
I've heard of his plan but still like Hillary's plan better. Her's is universal healthcare where everybody will be covered. National healthcare is a bit different in that it will only cover about 5 million of the currently 47 million uninsured.
2 people like this
• United States
31 Jan 07
I'm not sure about that. I think Hillary's plan is a bit outdated, I also don't think that Congress would work as well with her to get a bill passed. JMHO. Thanks for your input though. I appreciate it.
@ebfh2006 (175)
• United States
26 Jan 07
I agree completely with Barak Obama. We need universal health care in this country. Good, quality healthcare should be a right not a privilege.
2 people like this
• United States
26 Jan 07
Thank you ebfh. I appreciate your input. I agree it should be the right of every American. Pinkeagle, I can see what you mean about being able to way the pro's and con's of the situation before deciding. I admit that is a necessary evil. Everything these days is already so "policitizied", that adding one more thing, such as health care, isn't really going to matter. Thank you for sharing your views. I appreciate the input.
• United States
26 Jan 07
Absolutely, "Good quality healthcare" should be available. Do you see the difference between what you have said and what I have said? I said it should be available. You said it should be a right. The problem with creating a government "right" to health care is that "Good quality healthcare" will be destroyed in the process. Anything the government runs will become politicalized. This will result in not only mediocracy but the eventual displacement of private practice by doctors. Think not? Try studying the Hillary Clinton health care plan from the early 1990's. Yes, we want "Good quality healthcare". However, the choice is between "Good quality healthcare" and "government run mediocrity". Take your pick, but don't fool yourself before you decide.
1 person likes this
• United States
16 Feb 07
We do need a national medical health care system. THere are many uninsured Americans, myself being one of them. For my Christmas 2001 present, I ended up with a hernia, & just last month, I was finally paid in full after all of the bills I ended up getting. The part that gets me is that there are illegal aliens getting medical care for free, with OUR tax money. In the meantime, as an American citizen, I've been dragged through collection agencies in having problems paying those bills.
@KrauseHome (36448)
• United States
24 Nov 08
Personally I think it is beyond time that someone really considers doing something with the Medical coverage here in the US. When too many people are loosing their Health Care benefits, and having to pay horrendous amounts just to stay alive, it is crazy. It is truly about time somehow they make Health Care affordable to everyone before we see more people dying from small things like the Flu and Colds as well. For me, I know it is a wait and see, but I for one will be Glad if this is one promise he can obtain to come to pass for sure.
@mirage108 (3402)
• United States
26 Jan 07
I have mixed feelings on this. In one way it would be great to have a national health care system. in another way it would be bad as it would be another way for the govenment to keep tabs on all of us.
1 person likes this
• United States
26 Jan 07
I understand your feelings, but in my opinion, I would rather have a universal health care system, than have the government monitoring my calls and mail. They are going to, at least in this administration, play big brother. It is sad our country has come to this.
1 person likes this
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
8 Feb 07
Hillary had 8 years and could not come up with a plan. What is he going to do different? How is he going to pay for it? What do the people who have opted for better health insurance in stead of salary increaces? Will we get an increase in pay? These are some of the problems he will have to overcome and answer before we get National Health Insurance.
@pinkeagle (202)
• United States
26 Jan 07
A national health care system in the USA will be the same mess that it is in any other country. A national health care system will result in excessive waiting time for critical operations. A national health care system will result in a priority system for apportioning health care. A national health care system will mean a shortage of people willing to be health care workers. A national health care system hamper research as the profit goes out of such research and inefficient government funded research replaces private research. A national health care system will first stagnate then cause to decline, the overall level of health care in the USA. A national health care system means mediocrity will replace excellance. The current system, while not perfect, is slowly getting better. It is getting better because the governemt is not running it! True, the progress is not as fast as anyone would like, but it is progress. A national health care system would be the end of that progress.
• United States
26 Jan 07
Amen cremechese! I can tell from the responses above that those that are in opposition are those that have never had to do without medical coverage. I myself have been there, and it is not pretty. And what makes it worse is that the medical professionals charge more to those without insurance than they do to the insured and the insurance companies. That is pathetic. It's hard enough on working families as it is, without adding the burding of lack of insurance to take care of them when they need it.
2 people like this
• United States
31 Jan 07
I disagree, I do not think that private insurance will ever be cheaper than a government run program. We have been hearing that promise for years, and all I have seen are astronomical rate increases in both the insurance and medical industries.
1 person likes this
• United States
26 Jan 07
It is not true than no one opposing socialized medicine ever had to do without having medical insurance. My husband and I went over 15 years without medical insurance. In the long run, paying for one's own insurance is going to be cheaper than socialized medicine. Socialized medicine is going to be much more expensive than most people imagine. More expensive than private insurance.
2 people like this
• United States
17 Feb 07
who is barak obama??? i aint sure??? I have heard of him before... but I dont know who he exactly is??
• United States
10 Nov 08
I think he's full of himself, but that's beside the point. Keep this in mind while assembling: The NHC will NOT be free. You will pay for it. I will pay for it. Every working adult who pays taxes will pay for it. You'll pay for me if I have to go to the hospital. I'll pay for you if you have to take one of your kids to the ED for a broken leg. How will we pay for this? Taxes. Much, much, much higher taxes. The system we have in place right now doesn't work. Many states such as Tennessee, Hawaii, Florida and others are bouncing people off of the government run health care systems because of fraud and abuse. I have an uncle that lives in Knoxville, TN and he was booted off of TennCare (I believe that's the name) due to him not being "sick" enough. He has diabetes, high blood pressure, has had 3 heart attacks and can barely walk due to muscular dystrophy. Yet, the government felt he wasn't "sick enough" and could find work that had good benefits. My uncle has been on disability for a while now because of his MD not allowing him to work. Yet his neighbor down the road who claims he is too "sick" (read--fat lazy b*stard) got to keep his TennCare coverage even though he is MORE than capable of work. The problem with NHC in America is that: The abusers. I don't want HALF of what I make every month devoted to taxes. I make a pretty good amount of money in law enforcement. My husband works also. I know for a scientific fact we could NOT survive on half of what we make now. If 0bamanation gets his wish, be prepared to kiss half of your income you bring home every pay period, goodbye!
@suzzy3 (8342)
24 Nov 08
I know this is an old discussion but I feel it is so important.If you could get a health system in your country it would be a marvellous thing for you,ours in England is fantastic you just turn up and get the treatment you need,we pay for it with National insurance through the wages every week.It is money well spent and it is one of the best things we have although it is very expensive and if you are not on benefits you have to pay for prescriptions from the doctor that means the medicine. At the moment it is £7.10 each item,and we also have to pay at the dentist for treatment,not all of it , and the eye test and some glasses and contact lenses.All the treatment in hospital is free for everyone and it would be wonderful if you could have this type of system.Thanks for repling to my comment on longer posts welcome backxx
@loujac3 (1188)
• United States
8 Feb 07
With the rising costs of medical insurance and the fact that more and more employers are not offering it, yes I am in favor! Canada has a system, but they have to wait to get major things done. I think a system should be worked out. If we can so blatently waste money on useless research projects that don't produce paying results then why not a health plan? Our military pays outrageous amounts of money for simple things like toilet seats. So conserve on useless spending and redirect that money back to our people. We need to take care of our own people before we so frivolously throw it to other countries. Europe has a system and things run well there overall. It is time!
@meme0907 (3481)
• United States
27 Jan 07
Well I can't comment on the speech but I do believe we should have a better healthcare system-not everyone that doesn't have insurance from a job qualifies for state funded insurance & even for the ppl that have it many dr.'s & dentist's won't accept it. I think that's Bogus +'s 4 U :)
8 Feb 07
National health system for the States? I certainly hope not. Now don't jump down my throat. I am an American citizen living in the UK. I have seen the NHS up close and personal. I am also a UK citizen, best of both worlds. I went into hospital for surgery in December. The care was appalling, the hospitals are dirty. Get ready for WARDS. 6 beds in one room, no privacy only a curtain. Everyone will know your business, hear your conversations, know when you requested the bed pan. Not only was I not asked what I wanted for my meals, it seems that the nurses totally forgot that I was even there. They don't wash their hands before going on to the next bed. They don't use disposable gloves. I pushed the button for assistance for 10 minutes before anyone even showed up. They didn't check on me again. Get ready for waiting list. Waiting lists for MRI, for surgery, even x-rays. Doctor appointments last 10 minutes if you are lucky. If the country were to go NHS, you will want to get private insurance. No matter what you call it, you will still pay for your health care. It will come out of your paycheck. There is socialized medicine in the States, it is called Medicare/Medicaid. Living in the UK, I really miss the healthcare back home in the States. My advice is, don't do it.
• United States
27 Jan 07
I am in full support of Obama. I think he is a jewel in this political system that really needs to be given a chance to shine. I believe in the promises and aspirations that he sets forth, and I believe that they can be seen through with. I hope that this aspiration goes through like he wishes it too! Universal healthcare does wonders in other nations, it is depressing, and somewhat shocking, to me, that the United States has not embraced the system yet! This country is the "land of opportunity" yet we are not given the opportunity to be taken care of, regardless of income or status, in the event that our health is failing. I find that to be a cynnical, ironic joke. Universal healthcare is a must!
• United States
28 Jan 07
I'm in favor of universal health care. We're the only industrialized country in the world that doesn't have it. Our health care system is the most expensive one in the world, but we're not getting much for it. Too many people's lives are devastated by medical expenses. Not a good situation.