more interesting, ther movie or the book?

I enjoy both of them. But since I read the book first, and watch the movies later, I will go on for the book. Because I've got so many details in the book that I can't found in the movies. So i think it's natural. And i won't say that the movie is worse. Since like i've said before, i'm enjoying both of them :)

Well, the movies are certainly more interesting because they have the advantage of images, music, and real people to get their stories across, but like most people have said so far, I think that the books are my favourite form of the Harry Potter story because they are so much more detailed and intricate. There have been so many times where there has been a plot twist and I have sat on my bed wondering, "How on Earth did that happen?" before remembering some obscure detail from four books earlier that made the current situation possible. I loved seeing how J.K. wove little hints and bits of information through the earlier books and then brought everything together in the later ones.

Reading books is not my hobby and also I can't watch all of the series of Harry Potter movies, but according to my friend he said that he will prefer to read all of the series of the Harry Potter. Because all of the detailed are completed in the book. Happy mylotting and always take care.

I thought the books were more interesting because the movies left out crucial parts and made it harder for non die hard fans to understand. It is nice to have the movies from a visual standpoint but I love HP just the same without them.

I think I enjoying reading the book more.... The books is the original, and the film based on it... But with 1h30', a film can't transfer all the meaning of the books. So I guess I stick with book then

I am not fond of reading books so I have to say the movie. I enjoy watching movies more than reading books. When some people say that the book is better than the movie, I really don't care much. I would rather watch it than read--it'll be through in 2 hours or so. It's a fun and interesting movie but I think Lord of The Rings Trilogy movies were better. :)

the hp films were great but the books were more accurate, more detailed, more interesting. some of the films removed some parts of the books. the only plus i could give the movies is that they made my visualization of the content of the book clearer.

What led me to read the first book was the first movie. What compelled me to watch the next movies are the books. A little too ironic, don't you think? I was greatly intrigued by the movie that it prompted me to read the first book which I loved. If the book wasn't any good, I would have probably brushed the movie off as an overly ambitious kid flick and never watched the sequels. I watched the movies to see how the book would play out. How truly magnificent to see Harry being chased by a dragon. To see the emotion play out on character's faces and get to understand them without even hearing them speak. I am super excited for the last installment!

All HP books and films are both interesting. With regards to JK Rowling books, you can see her style in writing while in the films, you can see how those directors and the entire cast and crew give life to the characters in the novel. Daniel is a very god actor. He plays Harry Potter very well. Kudos Daniel!