Linux distro war

Philippines
April 26, 2007 9:04pm CST
Which linux distro do you prefer and why? I prefer OpenSuse 10.2. I already tried Fedora and Ubunto but I find it easy to install, configure and use OpenSuse.
9 responses
@windhair (498)
• Germany
29 Apr 07
I'm using SuSe in my office. At home, I installed Redhat 9 years ago. Another is the Linux on one CD, Knnopix, I do like it. About 6 years ago I used Mandrake for several time. Above, Suse is more sophistacted one for office useage. I do not know so much about it, since I'm not the administrator.
• Philippines
30 Apr 07
I also would like to try Knoppix. I heard its OS size could even fit in 1 floppy disk.
@windhair (498)
• Germany
30 Apr 07
Yes, it is true. But for a real useble system you still need a USB of CD with around 10M space. For a bootable floppy disk, maybe only the basic file management is possible.
• Canada
4 May 07
DSL has a footprint of 50 MB and it comes with a graphical environment and some cool software. I made a knoppix live CD long time ago out of curiosity. I also have a Kubunto live CD, I just wanted to try it, but I think that the live version lacks a lot of software.
• Philippines
29 Apr 07
I have an unfinished Debian Sarge install on my home PC. I've installed Ubuntu but the no-brainer install also limits customization options. I can't even make the default OS WinXP, which is necessary since I'm not the only one using it at home.
• Philippines
30 Apr 07
Yes, quite. The only Debian based distro I've successfully installed was Ubuntu. I try to be a purist for Free Software and go for real Debian, but it's not without its difficulties. Once after a long install of Woody, the older version of Debian, I got all text based and couldn't get X to work, even if I supposedly selected it during installation. If you want a graphical Debian installer, try the installer at http://goodbye-microsoft.com. It's a neat graphical installer you can start out on Windows, then proceeds to an intuitive graphical install.
• Philippines
30 Apr 07
I'm curious about Debian Sarge. I think it's more difficult to install.
@andben (1075)
• Italy
28 Apr 07
I currently use Mandriva distribution and I have tried Knoppix live, Slackware Fedora and Red Hat. I use Mandriva because is easy and fast to install, easy to use and it supports rpm packages to install new software, also in automatic way thanks to the rpm package manager. I haven't tried Opensuse and Ubuntu so I can't say anything about that.
• Philippines
30 Apr 07
I thought Opensuse has the easiest means to install rpm because of its YAST. I just found out from you that Mandriva also has an automatic way of installing rpm thru rpm package manager. Thanks for sharing.
• Canada
4 May 07
If I am not mistaken, YAST allows you to update your software from some internet sites. By default RPM updates the software from the installation DVD. In Mandriva (the distribution I use as well), it is possible to specify the URL of a web site from wich you want to update your packages. I think that you don't have to do that in YAST. I use DSL on an old computer and I think that software installation is based on YAST. It just goes on the internet and looks for the appropriate updates.
• Italy
27 May 07
I' using Kubuntu distro and i am very happy, is very easy to use, there are lot tutorial "how to" and is supported by lot of developers team!
• United States
11 Jun 07
Right now I'm using Ubuntu, but I am open to try some other distributions, and will try them in the near future, since it's the summertime, and I have all the time in the world.
• United States
13 Jul 07
I've been using Ubuntu for almost two years (maybe a little more than a year and a half, and have not had any real negative experiences with it. Before that, I used SimplyMepis. Before that, Windows. However, I'm not terribly picky and my Linux needs differ a bit from your average Linux user's needs - I'm a stay-at-home mom with no programming background, I use it entirely for entertainment (certainly don't need it for work), and I'm kind of a desktop environment junkie (I got started screwing around with pretty, alternative GUIs when I was a teen using Windows, and fell in love with Litestep, BB4win, and Windowblines). As long as my distro is easy to install, and is easy to get completely functional within less than a day (including the ability to play proprietary video/audio formats and streaming web content), I'm happy. I've also got a soft spot for Slax. Slax has booted on every machine I've tried it with. I have a few friends that I've had to boot into Slax due to broken Windows installations. Great little distro to rescue stuff with.:)
30 Apr 07
i've used plenty over the years i've been trying linux. right now i'm using vista... i NEED my games! :p but as for the distro, i like ubuntu at the min. I like the way it feels more solid than some of the old distros. having said that my fav all time distro i've used has to be arch. http://www.archlinux.org/ i really recommend giving it a try. the base package installs from a server and u pick each package u want. every thing is customisable pretty much. its how i learned how to really use linux.
@PsychoDude (2013)
• Netherlands
1 May 07
I am using Ubuntu for quite some time now already on my laptop, although it has not always been without problems. In general though solving problems is quite easy though if you aren't afraid to dive into the command-line. But I must say it is all from as user friendly as it tries to be. I definitely doubt my granny would be able to use it ;).
@annateh (24)
• Malaysia
12 May 07
I prefer Ubuntu because it is easy to install, has a huge software repository, strong user/community support in the web.