Is 3.5 years enough of a sentence for assault, murder and grand theft?
By pilbara
@pilbara (1436)
Australia
May 3, 2007 10:59pm CST
Last year 2 teenage girls attacked and robbed a 53yo male taxi driver (he was disabled due to a stroke which had left him partly paralysed)
They beat him up, left him for dead on the road, stole his taxi and subsequently crashed it.
They later bragged about it which contributed to their capture, and were proud that their story had made the news. They had been smoking marijuana and drinking alcohol which they had apparently been doing since they were young, the rest of their family have the same habits apparently.
They pled guilty to the charges, but the judge gave them this sentence as he considered they should have a chance for rehabilitation.
Given their history, what they did and their attitude about it, I doubt they can be rehabilitated.
5 people like this
13 responses
@taymouse (585)
• United States
4 May 07
It's definitely not enough. I've heard of teens who have done not even as bad as that and got 17 years or so. That's terrible. I can't see how people can be so screwed up as to steal, beat, and murder. And if they are that screwed up, they're a danger to society and I think the girls need a lot more time, if not life. They should have at least 20-30 years.
2 people like this
@pinkcarebear1350 (139)
• United States
4 May 07
That's doesn't seem like adequate enough punishment in my opinion. Besides, in my opinion nothing will rehabilitate someone better than prison. When I was younger, an ex of mine and his friend committed a murder. Both were young at the time. And one got two life sentences and the other got twenty-five years. I understand these girls were young but still, even as a teenager you're aware of your actions, and you make your dscisions and you have to deal with the consequences. If you're old enough to take someone's life then you're old enough to do the time.
2 people like this
@fiyahcreation (2140)
• United States
4 May 07
they should have gotten more like 10 years, the justice system tends to be easier on women, especially white women
2 people like this
@lisagayle (393)
• United States
4 May 07
I think that it is a crime that these girls just basically got a slap on the wrists. If they show the ability to be able to do something like that, they should be put away for a long time, I think that rehabilitating is just another way of saying our prisons are too croweded as it is so I am going to be easy on you and when you get out you can do it all over again. What is the matter with people anymore? Is there no respect for human life at all. That man did not deserve what he got and they should have to pay dearly for the pain and suffering that they caused him. if the laws were stiffer about punishing the crimes committed, and young people knew what they were going to face for doing wrong, it may or may not have an impact on what they are thinking about doing.
1 person likes this
@pilbara (1436)
• Australia
4 May 07
Thank you for your response. I believe that it was a slap on the wrist for them but a slap in the face for his family.
It seems to me that it is becomming common for the perpetators of a crime to be given more consideration than the victims of the crime. They chose to act in this way and were proud of their actions, the punishment should be appropriate.
@HighReed1 (1126)
• United States
30 May 07
I agree with you. The punishment should fit the crime.It is a shame that the victim's rights are trampled so often.
@cyclonewriter (2168)
• United States
5 May 07
Part of the problem with teenagers today is that they know they are going to get off with a light sentence. If judges and juries would be more willing to make examples out of kids like this, things would improve. If they are old enough to make these decisions, they are old enough to suffer the consequences. I have no patience for this type of behavior. Great topic !
@elshaddai123 (3981)
• Kottayam, India
4 May 07
Looing to their age,but looking to their actions they should be punished more, is my view.
2 people like this
@maddog108 (3435)
• Australia
4 May 07
i think a more active roll in sentecing is needed i wonder if they would concider doing it again if part of there sentence was to be beaten to a pulp and left on the side of the road.sounds a bit hard i know but it works.i was liveing in a ruff area houses were broken in to all the time and assults were common.2 guys climbed over my fence they were heading for my house i let my dog out he dropped both of them i also ran at them and gave them a major reason not to come in my yard.word got around real fast and i noticed they just left me alone.more for the reason they knew if they were caught it would hurt.it didnt seem to stop them though they just sort out easyer targets there not scared of the police and the court and jail system is a joke but if you give em a good belting and make it hurt they sure seem to take notice
1 person likes this
@stephcjh (38473)
• United States
4 May 07
I don't think three and a half years is near long enough of a sentence for this person. Those teenage girls need to be taught a lesson for other teenagers who are planning to do the same thing to someone else. their punishemnt does not fit the crime at all. I don't think they can be rehabilitated either because they have done a very bad thing at a very young age. Just think of what they will do when they become adults?
1 person likes this
@elisa812 (3026)
• United States
4 May 07
Wow, that's awful! Especially that they were so proud of what they had done! I completely agree with you, it doesn't sound like they're going to be rehabilitated, especially if they had no remorse. They're probably just going to brag about it even more cause they got away with murder and hardly even had to pay for it. Those girls obviously knew what they were doing and don't even care, so I think they should have the strictest sentence possible. I can only imagine how horrible that must be for that man's family, knowing that those girls are barely getting punished for what they did to him!
1 person likes this
@sunshinelady (7609)
• United States
29 May 07
I don't think that is harsh enough punishment. They showed no remorse and laughed about it. They were proud of what they did. They should have been given more than rehab. They didn't care that they hurt someone plus wrecked his means of income. I think they need jail time to see how serious this really is. They will do something wrong again and not care what person they hurt in the process. All they got was a smack on the hand and that wasn't even a hard smack.
@eyewitness (1575)
• Netherlands
4 May 07
Though they are teenagers they did know that's it's a crime and that it's bad.So why sending them back to society after 3,5 years they almost killed someone.They already took his life in the physical way.3,5 years is way too short.
They know right from wrong so why treating them like a baby.Just treat them like adults
@castleghost (1304)
• United States
4 May 07
I don't believe that the judge in this case did the victim justice. This girls got a slap on the wrist for what they did to this poor man. Who is going to have to live with this the rest of his life. And what kind of life is he really going to have?
In my eyes the judge failed not only the victim but also these girls. Because he isn't really teachinf them a lesson.I understand that they are still young but neither of them sound remorseful for all of the suffering they put this poor man through.
1 person likes this
@pilbara (1436)
• Australia
4 May 07
They killed the man so he isn't going to have to live with it, but his family is.
Thanks for your reply. I don't believe the judge did the right thing either and he even said in his statement that he thought that people would be upset about the light sentence.