Spiderman 3 v/s 300
By naveenlb
@naveenlb (277)
India
16 responses
@eclecticsteve (253)
• United States
7 May 07
I enjoyed Spiderman 3 much more. I thought the special effects were better, the acting was better, the story was better and the conflict was better. In truth though, I was really disappointed with 300 because I didn't think it was historically accurate. But if I consider the movie on its own, I lied 300, but I didn't think it was nowhere near as enjoyable as Spiderman 3
@chantz1821 (6)
• Philippines
8 May 07
i think i prefer 300..spiderman 3's special effects was awsome but the movie is too long which makes it a little boring.though it is only at some point in the movie.but that just what i think..300 is the best for me..
@niharikadacoolest2 (468)
• India
5 May 07
300 is the best movie i have ever seen. I hope spider man will be also same exciting and great as 300. But 300 is incomparable. It has broke the ultimate record of exclusive direction. Great movies! Great Directors!
@jonny5007 (13)
• United States
26 May 07
300 was definetly the best action movie I've ever seen, as far as hand to hand combat is concerned.
@nevandaar (96)
• Philippines
4 May 07
spiderman 3, maybe its just me, but i realy didnt find 300 that amusing, story wise and cinematography wise. hey its just me...but i dont know with other people...but i dont discredit 3oo though...
@Latrivia (2878)
• United States
25 May 07
I was disappointed with Spiderman. They killed off venom way too quickly - and the love triangle kind of ruined it for me. All the time they wasted to set that up, and they could have better spent it on Venom...he didn't even get to eat people.
300, on the other hand, blew my mind. I went in expecting to be disappointed, as I usually am with movies based off Greek history or myths, and when I walked out I found myself wanting to buy another ticket to see the movie.
@piyoz000 (432)
• Philippines
22 May 07
300 is incomparable to spiderman 3 and vice-versa... 300 was an epic movie while spiderman based from a comic book... in 300, the characters are weird and some are only ordinary humans with extraordinary strengths, unlike in spiderman 3 that the characters became heroes by accident, either being biten by an insect or caught in an experiment... both movies are great in each own way...
@forrest79 (7)
• China
27 May 07
frankly speakin, I think 3 will be the best and there will be never 300. someone just lik to have long dream but that is simply not realistic I think
@nash272 (17)
• India
1 Jun 07
well spiderman 3 is all about emotions with action
but 300 is an xcellent action movie!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
its 300
@akulaa5521 (30)
• Malaysia
26 May 07
for me i think both are good, the story can make people think what will happen next. yeah...both movie is enjoyable
@painkiller77 (2073)
• India
3 Sep 08
i go for 300 as 300 is an absolutely terrific movie. the attitude, the valour the spartans display send a chill down my spine. so much to keep their honour. they challenged and even demured a person who projected himself as god. i think they were bogged down by the wrong priests who just had no respect for these warriors. my personal favorite line in the movie when the king says : SPARTANS NEVER RETREAT!!!!!!!!!!. the greatest sequence when the king as a young lad fights the beast and also , when he kicks the intruder into the well..
@sunslinger (474)
• Singapore
6 May 07
Spiderman 3 was awesome but you asked for better than the best and that has gotta be 300!
We are Spartan!!
@murtagh92 (182)
• United States
22 May 07
actually, truth be told, i haven't seen spiderman 3 yet :[
i know, but a lot of my friends said it wasn't worth it; i have however, seen 300 and it is worth the money!! so go see it cuz it ROCKS, o ya