Do You Think the Undertaker Would Ever Lose a Wrestlemania Match?
By rockerwitch
@rockerwitch (538)
Philippines
May 6, 2007 11:24am CST
15-0. That is such an amazing record. But there are still a lot of Wrestlemanias to go and there are pretty competent new wrestlers emerging in the scene. Do you think, until he retires, that Undertaker will never ever lose in Wrestlemania and come down in history as the only wrestler with a perfect record in the said event? For me, yes, I think he will win in all. May WWE be scripted or not, he will win it all because he's such a great and respectable wrestler and he deserves it. What do you think? If you don't agree, who do you think will ever beat him? Is the wrestler who's going to beat him already in WWE now or is he just about to arrive?
2 people like this
7 responses
@deadraven999 (1386)
• Saudi Arabia
9 May 07
I think he deserves more than anyone else to keep this record, I would love 2 see him victorious at wrestlemania over and over. If i give him a couple of years before he retires i would love 2 see 17-0.
Nobody deserves to stop his winning streak at Wrestlemania, you know something ? i wish that in next Wrestlemania he's haunted by a figure from his past Like Lesnar, you know the Undertaker never defeated Lesnar and i do want 2 see Deadman beat him at Wrestlemania 24, take revenge and scores another victory.
Thanks for the interesting post...
1 person likes this
@deadraven999 (1386)
• Saudi Arabia
22 Jul 07
Thank you very much for the best response. I was surprised. Thank you again my friend. Going back 2 Taker x Lesnar matches, they battled each other twice, the first one was draw i think and the second one was hell-in-a-cell match where Paul Heyman cuffed the deadman and Lesnar beat the living hell out of the Undertaker. It wasn't fair, the Undertaker deserved the victory. But I guess wwe were in the process of marketing Lesnar during that time.
Thanx again 4 the vote.
@rockerwitch (538)
• Philippines
19 Jul 07
Oh yeah I completely agree with you. hmm. I don't know about Lesnar. There were a couple of years when I didn't watch WWE (I kinda regret it now lol!) But yeah, that would be a great match. Is Lesnar still alive?
I wish Undertaker would come back already. At most I hope he'd reach 20-0 ha ha ha but he's pretty old. Still, I don't think anybody deserves the honor to beat the Undertaker, especially in a Wrestlemania match.
Thanks for your response!
@boyfriend2k4 (398)
• Australia
6 May 07
Once undertaker stated that if he had to lose he would lose it to some high superstar like Austin or Rock. Last year or something he proposed he would lose to Kane but then in respect Kane didnt agreed.
I will definately quit watching WWE if he loses to that C"Rap" wrestler John cena
@rockerwitch (538)
• Philippines
8 May 07
He did say that? When? Whoa. If I were Austin or the Rock, I would've felt very flattered! Lol! Anyway, yeah, I agree with you. If the Undertaker loses to Cena... even though I'm a big fan of Cena's, I'd be disappointed. Because it's like, they're in a different league, right? I mean, yeah, Batista is relatively new to the business compared to the Undertaker but they kind of are on the same page.
@id_pop (293)
• Philippines
13 May 07
The reason why the Undertaker proposed that he lose to Kane is because of the huge amount of respect the latter is garnering from the other wrestlers (the Undertaker, in particular). It is said that Kane is one of the best people to have backstage, and although he's playing the role of an "evil" wrestler, it's far from who he really is outside the show. That aside, the "brothers" storyline is a convenient excuse for them to fight.
@kgwat70 (13388)
• United States
6 May 07
I think he will eventually lose a Wrestlemania match but not sure who it will be that will beat him. It could be John Cena or Batista in a rematch. He could end up losing his title in one of those triple threat or four man matches. I can only see right not Batista or Cena beating him but as you said there could be some new people that may have a chance. Umaga might be able to take him on as well. I would like to see Kane go up against the Undertaker.
@rockerwitch (538)
• Philippines
7 May 07
Hmm. Good point. Those triple threats and 4-way matches are very tricky. For me, Batista has more of a chance of beating 'Taker than Cena. What do you think? Umaga has a fair chance yeah, but I think the Great Khali could beat him. Did they ever settle their feud?
@megaplaza (1441)
• Nigeria
7 May 07
i dont see him lose that record to batista, kane, shawn michael or cena. if umaga ever go up against undertaker, he will recieve the beating of his life. Undertaker is a legend. he is too much for anybody to beat him. i think he came in to wwe with the intention of keeping a clean sheet at the greatest wrestling event, wrestlemania. so i dont think he will lose it.
@rockerwitch (538)
• Philippines
8 May 07
Yeah, Umaga is a possible candidate for that too. But I was thinking of someone... a bit bigger I guess? But hey, Umaga may be able to beat Undertaker even if he's a lot shorter. I mean, Shawn Michaels almost won that Royal Rumble match, right?
@firstcontact1990 (1784)
•
12 May 07
I think it is the best, and that It wil never be beatne and is the thing that will define him above all the other legends.
@rockerwitch (538)
• Philippines
19 Jul 07
Yes, I agree with you. I hope Undertaker would never be beaten in Wrestlemania. I mean, it's a beat mean if they let him lose. After all this time, after establishing that status and that record, he'd just lose? No way. I really think that he deserves to have a perfect record until the day he retires. :) Like you said, that's what will define him above all the other legends.
@jinggay46 (263)
• Philippines
6 May 07
i think undertaker will eventually lose in wrestlemania. but it is too soon to say to whom he would lose. There are a lot of great wrestlers like Batista, Cena and HBK. Although I do agree with you that Undertaker is a great wrestler that deserves the title.
