Wild animals

There are instances where captivity is the only chance an animal can survive. A great example of this is the Sumatran Rhino, its numbers are so down and people hunt them for their horns. If there were no captive breeding programs or zoos that will protect them they would have been extinct already. But there are animals that are not meant to be in cages, like Eagles but as with the Philippine Eagle without people helping them they wouldnt survive. The real question is if captivity is bad no, the real question is, how safe is the wild now for animals and if man will let them live on the planet still. Captivity is not the problem but men who venture into the wild who has the intention to make money from it.

I think that wild animals that are found to not be able to live properly in the wild should be cared for at a zoo, or wildlife sanctuary. Some mothers get killed or die of whatever in the wild and their young are left behind. So I think its good when those young get picked up and cared for. Plus when a wild animal starts to become extinct, the wild animals in captivity of that type can be breaded and its off spring be released into the wild, thus repopulating that type.

well its tough to say.. essentially all wild animals shud remain wild forever. captivating them is not good. except the once who face extinction. for them aswell we can look to breed them in a sanctuary which is a controlled enviornment.. this is in d interest of us all and the animals as well..

uh... It kind of depends. As you can see, some animals are used to living in big spaces in the wild. While some animals might not be able to survive. Although zoo animals are said to live longer than those animals in the wild, it is not important to live a long live, but to be able to live an adventurous, meaningful life, no matter how short it is.