gender "roles": traditional or unconventional???

Tweet

We all know the traditional gender roles, where the man is supposed 2 be the provider and protector, and the woman is supposed 2 be the nurturer, who takes care of the home and the children. Of course, in THIS day and age, MANY couples DON'T subscribe 2 this way of being. There are women who make more money than their men, or are the SOLE "breadwinners" al2-gether; there are men who are "stay at home" dads", or, even if there are NO children in the equation, some men are STILL at home, while the woman is out working, supporting them. Then, in some couples, BOTH the man and woman do a little bit of everything EQUALLY, or close 2 it. And there are all types of "arrangements", across the board. Some say that the traditional way is best, because we are naturally "wired" 2 handle those positions best. Women are naturally better nurturers. Men are naturally better providers, better "hunters". Others feel it boils down 2 TEMPERAMENT more. There are naturally AGGRESSIVE women (who might be more suited 2 the "hunter" role), and there are naturally PASSIVE men (who might be naturally more nurturing, and better in a SUPPORTIVE role). And, also, in some relationships, the "roles" go back & 4th, depending on the situation. So, which is "better"? Which do u think makes 4 a long lasting, more fulfilling relationship? Traditional or unconventional? Somewhere in between? WHATEVER works 4 the 2 people involved? Which 1 r U? Which do U prefer? What are your thoughts?