Jimmy Carter "the grader" does not make him "the greater"

Tweet

To be upfront, I do not like many of the policies and actions that the current President Bush has taken during his 6 plus years in office. But for Jimmy Carter to call this President the worst in history? Talk about nerve. And although Carter's examples focused on foreign policy, the way he said it implied that Bush's administration is the worst overall. First let's compare the economies they administered over. Pretty similar. Gas prices hit record highs during both men's administrations, but under Carter, we lined up for blocks, and could only fill up gas on odd or even days depending on the digit of the car's license plate. We had record federal budget deficits under both men, but under Carter, the red ink took up a greater share of the national GNP. We had high unemployment and double digit inflation under Carter. Something not experienced even by Herbert Hoover (but to be fair, high unemployment/inflation happened to a lesser extent under Nixon)Good or bad, depending on one's circumstance, under both men, our country has gone through unreasonable real estate and gold speculation. As for foreign policy. Carter had the Camp David Accords. But that wouldn't have been possible without two things. 1. The shuttle diplomacy the Nixon and Ford Administrations engaged in, which I've never heard Carter give credit for, and 2. Begin and Sadat were courageous in what they did. Bush has tried, but I'll agree with Carter to the extent that Bush should try harder to negotiate peace in that part of the Middle East. As far as SALT II - thank goodness the Senate didn't ratify it - if so, the movie, "Red Dawn," might have been a docudrama about America's freedom fighters after the Soviet Union invaded us. But I exaggerate. As far as Iran - we were internationally humiliated for over a year, made worse by not having a back -up plan to the failed rescue mission. Now Carter's specific gripe was the pre-emptive attack on Iraq. As a private citizen, I don't think we should have invaded Iraq, and it's a policy I can't forgive the President on, and its where most of my opposition to the current President lies. However, there are two ways to look at this. If the current war and the first President Bush war are counted as separate wars, then yes, Carter would be right. But, if you see it as a continuation of the "first" Gulf War, then our invasion was more of D-Day rather than Pearl Harbor. Only the ground fighting stopped with the first President Bush, Clinton continued the air strikes. Under Bill Clinton, we were attacked by terrorists three times, and people should consider that his limited reaction may have given the terrorist confidence in planning the second World trade center attack. For review, there was the first World trade Center attack, the attacks on the US emabssies in Africa, and the USS Cole attack. If we include domestic terrorists, there's a fourth in the Oklahoma City Federal Building bombing. That said, World Trade Center II happened under Bush's watch, and it was nine months into his term. As far as the faith based initiatives. I'm not a big fan of government being a middle man to charitable contributions (just creates a level of bureaucracy which takes away money from people who need it the most) which is what's happening with tax dollars being granted out to charities, but I've no problem with faith based charities applying for and receiving grants, as long as they do not receive favorable treatments. Carter implied that they do, and if so, I'll agree with him here, but for me, that's not cause for Bush to be categorized as worst President ever. I disagree a lot with the current President, but as far as calling this the worst administration in history? I'm not ready to revive the misery index we had under Carter.