Does the size of the rock (ring) really matter?
@misssweetthingg (355)
United States
May 21, 2007 8:29pm CST
My husband and I were together for six years before we got married. I always wanted to get married but he didnt until we finally ended up doing it. Before hand he said but we dont have any rings..my response was who cares..the rings arent what matter. I am not materialisitc at all and I realize when the money is there I will have a ring. I am not the type of woman who likes big diamonds to flaunt though...I am curious...does the size of the rock matter to you?
9 people like this
21 responses
@magikrose (5429)
• United States
23 May 07
Size dosnt matter at all to me. Actually my engagement ring was not even a diamond it was CZ and I was very happy with that. It was the meaning behind it that meant more to me than the stone on my finger.
When we started looking at wedding bands we fell in love with a set that had an engagement ring and it had a diamond chip in it. My husband felt bad that the diamond was not bigger. I told him that I am happy with the diamond chip. To me it is still a diamond.
He ended making up for it a couple years later when he bought me a heart pendant with diamonds in it for valentines day.
1 person likes this
@lilaclady (28207)
• Australia
22 May 07
I have friends who think the size of the diamond is important and the amount of money spent is important, I always think if that is the most important thing to them then the feeling of true love is not there, I would wear a tap washer if that is what someone I loved gave to me even in a joke, I wouldn't even want to go pick a ring out with my partner to me the idea is what he gives me not about how much is spent...but then I am a deep thinker and the whole meaning of things is what matters to me...
@misssweetthingg (355)
• United States
22 May 07
I am with you. The ring dont matter..it can be lost and everything else, its the love that matters. If I was given a twenty dollar ring from Walmart, I wouldnt care because the ring doesnt make the marriage:)
@misssweetthingg (355)
• United States
22 May 07
Im with you because they are really missing out on a lot in life/love/relationship/marriage if the size of their rock is what matters to them.
@imadriscoll (2228)
• United States
22 May 07
I'm going to go a little against the flow of what everyone else seems to think. While I don't think that the size of the ring matters I know that it is important to some women, including myself, to have a ring. My husband and I have been married for 5 years, when we got engaged he gave me his grandmother's ring. His grandmother and his mother wore it when they were engaged. This ring has sentimental value as it has represented a legacy of successful marriages. I loved the meaning that it holds. At the same time I very much wanted a ring that I could call my own. This year my husband bought me a ring that is all my own, the ring I've always wanted. Both rings hold value in my heart, because they were both given to me in love by the man I will spend the rest of my life with.
1 person likes this
@misssweetthingg (355)
• United States
23 May 07
I can see where you are coming from on that. That would be neat to have a passed down ring of successful marriages. There is nothing wrong with rings, obviously, but I just dont think its right to flaunt it or think the marriage is a little on the odd side without one, you know?:)
@cher913 (25782)
• Canada
22 May 07
nope, i know a few couples that went without in order to use that money for something else...like towards the down payment of a house...looking back, i wouldnt have minded that...we were engaged for 2 years and after almost 20 years of marriage, i hardly ever wear my engagement ring or my wedding ring (i dont wear gold anymore...my thing is silver...i find that my diamond and wedding ring - which also has diamonds in it get banged around too much whether it be at work or at home...)
1 person likes this
@misssweetthingg (355)
• United States
22 May 07
I find that to be a lot of womens concerns as well! The ring is usually not worn because it gets banged up, lost, or messed up using chemicals.
@KatieS (503)
• United States
23 May 07
This is a great topic to bring up, just wanted to let you know. My husband and I were trying to save up for a couple of years for a big wedding, but everytime we got some money saved, we ended up using it for something important. So we decided to elope, got a bridal set for me and matching band for him at Walmart and ended up spending about $700 for everything, including hotel accommodations for 2 nights alone. It was absolutely wonderful. We decided to do all this because why spend a butt-load of money on entertaining other people and showing off a ring that wasn't necessary anyway. I don't wear my ring around the house, which is where I mostly am. I just needed something to show other people that I'm married I guess.
@misssweetthingg (355)
• United States
23 May 07
Thank you Katie!!:) I agree with you about the whole money thing!! I feel guilty spending a lot of money on stuff like that when I could be paying off some debt. Plus, the wedding is great, but, it only lasts one night, then what, your stuck for years paying it off! Sounds like you and your hubby had yourselves a great time, im so happy for you!
@misssweetthingg (355)
• United States
22 May 07
I see what your saying! Id rather have a beautiful wedding with a small priced ring than have a huge ring with a little wedding!
@misssweetthingg (355)
• United States
22 May 07
Youd be surprised how many people dont wear their wedding ring or how many people actually dont have them. I am seeing less and less rings on the fingers of married couples. Not saying its a good thing, it really doesnt matter because like we have been saying, its the size of the heart that matters. The diamond cant make you happy, the love is what makes you happy!
@kitkat1 (1227)
• Canada
22 May 07
To me the size of the rock means nothing at all. The meaning that is behind it says it all. The commitment of the marriage says it all to the rings will come wouldnt bother me either to wait for them. Just to hear my mate express those vows and want to become one with me is all that i need and is required to make it complete. To I believe a big flashy diamond dont mean anymore than a small one it is not the cost that measure the love in which it was given.
1 person likes this
@misssweetthingg (355)
• United States
22 May 07
Very true! Makes me wonder if these women who flaunt their big diamonds are flaunting them because they have no love to flaunt? Not in all cases but in a lot of cases, as I have seen anyway. Big or small on the ring size, dont matter, big or small on the heart size, DOES!
@wachit14 (3595)
• United States
22 May 07
If a woman is thinking about the size of the ring more than the love she is receiving from her man, then maybe she needs to move on. Jewelry should never be an issue in a relationship. When I got engaged to my husband he felt bad because he didn't have a ring to give me and I said that it was no big deal. Still, even though he didn't have a lot of money he bought me an antique ring which was very beautiful. Now I have a bigger diamond, but that little antique ring is still my favorite.
@misssweetthingg (355)
• United States
22 May 07
He didnt have a ring to offer you but he sure had that heart to offer you!!:) What more could you ask for, really:) Im with you, if shes seeking the size she needs to seek elsewhere.
@jmespinosa82 (498)
• United States
22 May 07
Of course not. My husband and I got married with our rings from the pawn shop because we really didn't have any money and for all three they were 100 bucks. Then this last year when we got our income taxes I asked him if I could get a set that I wanted and he said anything I wanted but they were only 700 dollars for both and the total wt is only .5 carat. I don't want anything more. I am happy with this one and so happy I have a husband that does anything for me. The size don't matter to me at all.
1 person likes this
@misssweetthingg (355)
• United States
22 May 07
Im in the same boat! I know of a lot of people that get their rings from the Pawn Shop. Same quality but big difference in price. 700 dollars isnt bad..if your happy, im happy:)
@kooulet (69)
• Philippines
22 May 07
Honestly, it DOES MATTER for some people who belong to the elite, the ones who have enough to spend. But in terms of the sincerity of the relationship, the material things are just secondary. The more important thing is the UNCONDITIONAL LOVE that exists between the two of you. The material things wear out in time. The worth diminishes. However, the Love that is priceless will still be the only thing that will hold on as the relationship lasts.
1 person likes this
@exclusively_rinku (891)
• India
22 May 07
for me it doesn't matter at all.what matters to me is my soulmate,my better half,my love.he is the biggest ornament that i wear every moment,in the sense that he is always with me,inside me.he has given me the biggest ever gift in this world - HIS HEART,HIS WHOLE LIFE,HIS LOVE.whatelse do i need???
its the unconditional love that is worthwhile and no big rock can overshadow it.ring is just a symbol of love for the person we love.but i don't think expensive things are needed to prove our love for our beloved.we can show our love by our loyality,sincerity and endless caring.
but it does matter for some people.those who are extravagant and materialistic.they measure their love by seeing how big the rock is.
but lastly its the love that counts and the source to all happiness that lasts forever and makes a relationship everlasting.
@misssweetthingg (355)
• United States
22 May 07
Materialistic really do not have pure happiness inside. That is why they need outside beauty to show it. The love is what matters! Sure, a ring is nice, but if I dont have one, its fine too!
@UDDERONES (887)
• United States
22 May 07
No the size of the ring doesn't matter, what matters to me is the size of his heart and love for me. I wouldn't even want to go with my husband to pick out the wedding or engagement ring. That is something special that he picks out for you. I have known others who went with the man to pick it out, but for me (and everyone has their own opinions and ideas) it made it more special for him to pick it out and to purpose to me.
Personally I have seen woman with HUGE rocks and I think man that would bug me as it would get in the way of everything I do. Mine is big enough and it gets in my way sometimes.
1 person likes this
@misssweetthingg (355)
• United States
22 May 07
Hehe. To me, huge rocks are gauddy! I just dont like the way they look. Thats my opinion though. Yah, I dont think I would want to go with mine either to go pick it out, its so cute when they do that on their own:) That is a time where us women actually let our men think on their own and are okay with it..lol, just kidding!
@deedles88 (297)
• Australia
22 May 07
Honestly, it doesnt matter. I dont care at all how big the rock is. To me, if people show it off, and brag about how many carrats it is, how expensive it is, I think they are materialistic and I just dont listen.
Its about the commitment you are about to make, and the person you will be with for the rest of your life. Not the big bling on your finger.
1 person likes this
@misssweetthingg (355)
• United States
22 May 07
I think it all boils down to how materialistic the person is. I have had a few people tell me, that is the ring he got you, I said yep, but his love is way bigger, so whatcha got..hehe:)
@highflyingxangel (9225)
• United States
22 May 07
I don't think it does. A ring however is nice, it's a nice outward, symbolic gesture of the relationship. However I don't think you need something huge and outrageously expensive to prove your love to each other and to others. That's just silly. As long as you like it, the price, nor the size should matter.
1 person likes this
@misssweetthingg (355)
• United States
22 May 07
Right! Its nice to have a ring, but if I dont have one I am okay with that too as long as we love each other and we both know that!:)
@maddysmommy (16230)
• United States
22 May 07
Not to me it doesn't. My husband was a little embarrassed to give me one because he thought I wouldn't like what he chose, but I loved it, its the thought that counts not how big the rock is. I wear it everyday and rarely take it off.
1 person likes this
@saigonwarrior (1331)
• United States
22 May 07
Nope, it doesn't matter at all to me. It is only a rock. I am not materialistic at all either. I don't even wear my wedding rings half of the time. I rarely wear them at home because I have my hands in water or cleaning agents so often then I just forget to put them back on when I go out half of the time. I never understood why some women just have to have an expensive engagement ring/ bridal set. Does the size of the ring make you love your husband more?
I don't think so. It is just something to show off.
1 person likes this
@misssweetthingg (355)
• United States
22 May 07
Definitely just something to show off. I hear people say too that whatever the man pays for the engagement ring, he has to top it with the wedding ring, how ridiculous. My brother spent 2000 on the engagement ring, that is outrageous. I dont think I could accept something that expensive, id rather take it back and spend the money on my family!
1 person likes this
@Karmalina (647)
• Australia
22 May 07
The price of the ring/size of the rock never mattered to me. I would always want to have a wedding band though even if it was a very inexpensive one. Haven't you ever heard the phrase "Well I don't see a ring on your finger?" It's because of that. That is true. It can save a woman a lot of hassle having a ring and it's nice to have a constant reminder of your husband or wife don't you think?
1 person likes this
@misssweetthingg (355)
• United States
22 May 07
You are right about that. But the way society is today, it doesnt even matter if a man sees the ring or not..sometimes they want the woman more if she is married and vice versa!
@sramsey150 (162)
• United States
22 May 07
no it doesn't as long as you love who your with than why should that matter. most women focus on that for social status and not love. i myself aren't a jewlery person either and when me and my husband got married i only wanted to wear my engagement ring and i bought my husband a wedding band but i decided this because the diamond was expensive enough and that's all i needed when he told me how much it cost i mean really that money he spent on the ring could have went towards a down payment on a house.
1 person likes this
@misssweetthingg (355)
• United States
22 May 07
Exactly, the money could be well spent on plenty of other things..its the love not the ring.