What should be age diffrence diffrence between tow childs?

well My two boys are 20 months apart and they get along just fine playing and things like that. My sister and I are 3 years apart and it was nice but it was really hard getting along because we wanted to have a lot of the same friends. I think it all depends on the preference of the children's parents.

I think the age differnce really doesn't make any difference. I liked the idea of haveing mine close together. I had 4 kids in 6 years. We all got along fine. None were neglected. I was happy to have all the diapers and bottles over with all at once. They did a good job of helping and intertaining each other. b\But I will say that haveing them close or far apart does not guarntee that they will be close when they get older and grown up.

I think they should be a few years apart myself. Like you wrote about 3 years that way the first child is usally done with potty training and bottle feeding.

lots of doctors say that keeping the children apart by a good five years or more is the best way to do it. this has given the mother sufficient time to have fully recovered from the previous childbirth. this means that the second child will be as healthy as the first. we can observe that for most families where the kids are not spaced apart, the first one enjoys better health and is more intelligent, too. if we give 5 years before having the second child, the parents will be giving the second child to have as much chance of being at an advantage as the first one.

i have 2 sisters both older one is 7 years older and the other is 9 years older. But they left home early and one wasnt raised at home so i was more or less wihtout siblings, my children are 6 1/2, the next one is almost 4 and my youngest is almost 2 so like 2 years between with one with almost three and i like it that way each of them have someone to play with and their ages arent so far apart that they are into different things. I think what ever a parent feels comfortable with having their childrens ages spaced to be is what is the right answere. If a family wants to have children with only a year between them then that should be fine as well as a family wanting to wait until one heads off to school before having another. I dont think that there is a right or wrong answere to this question

I feel that the minimum difference between two children should be atleast 3 years and not more than 5 years. This would provide best care to all your children in infancy, coz that is the age of growing and infants need to most care. Me and my siblings do have a difference of 3 years each.

In my opinion i think 2yrs of age gap is more than necessary for them to understand eachother and i think more gap creates differences between them as the supiriority comes in between them in every thing they try to manage to understand.

Well there are two - three kind of opinions. Which opinion is best one can not say! Mostly the experiences are suggesting that considering child to child learning and child to child care concept naturally occurring in society; there should be 2 years distance between two child! More distance some time affects the other child and the envy element develops inside!

it really depends on the parents..but in my case i have tow children a boy and a girl and their age difference is just 15 months...talk about too close apart.LOL! At first it was rather difficult and really i almost ran out of patience...and it costs too much too..with diapers, milks, clothes and not to mention hospital bills and doctors appointments. Now im quite happy that they are a little grown but still they are my babies.

I think two or three years would be the best. I'm an only child, but my boyfriend has an older sister, she is 6 years older than him and it's really quite a big gap. They get along okay now, but it was harder when they were younger especially as they had to share a room for a long time because their house was so small.

I think that the right age difference between children is whatever the parents decide it should be. I had 6 children in just under 11 years. The age differences between all of mine from the youngest to the oldest is like this... 18 1/2 months, 2 years 1 month and 19 days, 2 years 7 months and 6 days, 2 years 19 days, and 2 years 7 months and 5 days. They all get along well with each other and there are no set "groups" among them, meaning no one is left out. The middle ones bridge the gap between the older and younger ones. The older ones look after the little ones. Everybody is happy. I have 2 sisters, They were born less than 11 months apart. They are very close to each other. I was born 7 years and 1 day after the younger of the two was born. I might as well have been an only child. We are not close at all.

I think this depends upon the age and attitude of the couple. If they are over aged and late married it is better to have the children in succession. Otherwise it is good to have a gap of three or four years between the children. I have two daughters and they have a gap of four years between them. Thank you.

Yes some says it must be 3 years some differs.I think it can be anything between 3-8 years depending on various situation.My brother is 5 years younger to me.He was born when i already started going to school.

i say 2 max 3 year, in this way they will understand musch better, betwen my sister and me are 7 years difference and we dont have very much things in common, she have other ideas and idol

I think the difference should be about atleast 2 to 3 years ....................

I believe a 2 year age difference is sufficient. that way the kids can be close to each other too - there need not be a generation gap between them. Kids closer to age are able to share more with each other and i would like that for my children.

Hey there, I am the oldest in our family of 3, we are all 2 years apart from each other. I have two children and they are 2 years apart from each other. To answer your question, I think its really up to the parents to decide, wether or not they can handle the work load of having alot of little ones so close together. I have a cousin that has 6 children, 1 for every year, for 6years lol if that makes sense. Now I have a brother with 6 children and there children are 1 and half years apart from the next lol... So depends on how the parents can handle the work load. I dont see anything wrong with having baby after baby anyway...

I have 3 kids now and my husband and I want one more. My oldest daughter and my second child is almost 4 years apart and they get along so well. She loves taking care of her brother and being big sister. My son and my youngest are like 2 years and 2 months apart and I really think it is too close in age. I think that about 3-4 years apart is good because it gives the mom time with each child for a couple of years while the other children are in school. Plus not so much stress on her as well. I think it does depend on the mom not really the kids. My kids get along just fine. They really don't fight and they play well with each other and bothe love taking care of the baby and playing with her.

I think perhaps 4 years is suitable. As the parents won't be so tired to take good care of two little babies at the same time.

well personaly i feel the age differnce between two children sud be 5 to 6 years so that the first child becomes lill bit matured,grown up ..atleast he can manage to do his own things..otherwise it becomes quite difficult for the mothers to manage two children of same age..but every thing depends on the will of the parents and the capacity of the mothers to handle their children properly..