A life full of love but poor in material things, or a rich life withaut love?
By al87exa
@al87exa (720)
Romania
May 30, 2007 7:42pm CST
Is hard to choice?Can love substitute a life with a lot of money? Money or love?
4 responses
@easy888 (10405)
• Australia
31 May 07
Hello,al87exa,I would prefer to have a life with love rather than rich life without love. Love cannot be subsituted for money,without love,we will feel lonely every time,even we are rich,we will not have anyone to share the happiness or sadness in life. Love may be from your family,friends,and partners,with the love and support of them,we can always be happy in our life even without a lot of materials.
@lquiambao (109)
• Philippines
31 May 07
I would always choose the first -- a life full of love but poor in material things. But come to think about it, when your life is full of love, you wouldn't feel that you're poor in material things coz you've got this "rich-like"
feeling because of your acceptance of what God has given you. Who needs the riches if nobody loves you?
@curvychick77 (1084)
• United States
31 May 07
Actually my life is full of love and we are poor in most material things. I'm happy though. Love is one of the most important things one should have in their life. Without love, there is no emotion and without emotion there is only despair.
@cecillecarmela (3818)
• Philippines
31 May 07
well i guess i'm contented with life full of love but poor in material things. happiness doesn't just consist of wealth. but by the people who cares to you a lot :D