Pakistan's government minister condones terrorism

@urbandekay (18278)
June 18, 2007 11:36am CST
Refering to Salman Rushdie's award of a Knighthood, Mohammed Ijaz ul-Haq, religious affairs minister, told the Pakistani parliament in Islamabad. "If someone exploded a bomb on his body he would be right to do so unless the British government apologises and withdraws the 'sir' title." Does this indicate that Pakistan secretly supports Muslim terrorism? all the best urban
4 people like this
7 responses
@mcrowl (1050)
• New Zealand
18 Jun 07
'Openly supports terrorism' is more like it. They were amongst the worst when Rushdie first published his book, along with their neighbours. And I hear on the news that a British Muslim MP is also condemning the knighthood. The interviewer said: isn't it a case of forgive and forget? And the MP said, yes....but! When people say 'yes, but' they really mean they don't agree at all. And anyway, what has Rushdie's knighthood got to do with Pakistan in the first place? Just goes to show yet again that Muslims are the most easily provoked people in today's world.
1 person likes this
@urbandekay (18278)
18 Jun 07
And master's of double speak all the best urban
@cerium (689)
18 Jun 07
Speaking of double standards, 1-Urbandekay, I wonder why you sound so different from one discussion to another?! And why are you employing generalization (which is the work of ignorants)? 2-Do you know where's the place of anti-semetics in Britain? Yes, it is in prisons, while anti-muslims are receiving knighthood honors. This double standards is what spreads hatred to extremists, but unfortunately, the Queen is so dumb to know that. I wonder what would the reaction be if an anti-semitic was awarded a knighthood? I bet that a formal appology from the Queen itself would have been issued.
1 person likes this
@urbandekay (18278)
18 Jun 07
You demonstrate your bias in comparing those who plot acts of murder with a novelist, grow up all the best urban
@cerium (689)
18 Jun 07
He's a radical extremist, and I am not surprised that he said it. It's really plain stupid of him. On the other hand, Salman Rushdie is an Islamophobic, it's really stupid of the Queen (and her advisors) to have him in the honor list (speaking politically). Anyway, I couldn't care less about these stupid knighthood honors.
1 person likes this
@urbandekay (18278)
18 Jun 07
Well, his knighthood is for his literary contribution not his political or religious views. all the best urban
1 person likes this
@urbandekay (18278)
19 Jun 07
No, you conflate racism with criticism. It is perfectly legitimate and indeed a good thing to be openly critical or sceptical of a culture or people but there is a world of differance between that and racism. If you consider that there is a case to be made that Rushdie is racist, then make it. But you cannot just assume his guilt. all the best urban
@cerium (689)
18 Jun 07
Bullshit. He won a Brookers prize (so did many writers), but his biggest achievement was 'The Satanic Verses'. It is what made him famous, thanks to the stupid 'fatwa' of the Irani leader by that time. He is a racist, who continues to incite hatred against Muslims and the Islamic faith. It's rwelly confusing to see the Queen granting him knighthood, unless she promotes religious intolerance!
2 people like this
@Naseem00 (1996)
• Pakistan
19 Jun 07
These remarks should be taken his personal views and not the Government's account. These are at the same time a reaction to the double standards applied by western governments in dealing with Muslims particularly.
@urbandekay (18278)
19 Jun 07
Lets hope they are just his personal views. No double standards here. all the best urban
@cerium (689)
19 Jun 07
He said that he didn't mean it anyway. Still thinks it was so stupid of him. And so wrong.
@Netsbridge (3253)
• United States
20 Jun 07
Urbandekay, renouncing and/or revolting against western ideologies does not make one a "terrorist" (regardless of how weird one's chosen method of protest may appear) - I am Christian, but do not agree with most of the ideas of most western nations, especially with respect to foreign or international policies. But again, I almost forgot that the US and British governments do also define "terrorism" as being knowledgeable, intelligent and having some commonsense!
• United States
26 Jun 07
Mcrowl, has it occurred to any of you yet that these Middle Easterners are going to these extremes because they have now come to believe that that is the only way they can rid their homelands of noted and historic pirates/plunderers - such as the US and British governments? And, before you continue to fuss about these dramatic killings of foreigners by the Middle Easterners, I will suggest that you read your Old Testament: Did you know that the Jews, according to the Old Testament, are instructed to do to "infidels" exactly what the Middle Easterners are doing to foreign invaders?
@mcrowl (1050)
• New Zealand
26 Jun 07
Hmmm...I don't know of any place in the Old Testament where the Jews are instructed to kill 'infidels.' They were instructed to destroy the people of Canaan because the latter had become so sinful God would no longer allow them grace to live. A slightly different situation, but one that Muslims no doubt try to turn to their advantage.
@mcrowl (1050)
• New Zealand
20 Jun 07
Certainly there's nothing to stop non-Western nations renouncing Western ideologies. But if it stopped there it might be okay. It's the idea that they can renounce these ideologies by blowing people up in the process that's so wrong and so offensive. But it's fairly plain to see from the way they treat their own people (75 killed in Iraq yesterday by other Iraqis) that they don't really care for human life anyway.
@cdparazo (5765)
• Philippines
19 Jun 07
That is a terrible thing to say. But it is only one man's view and doesn't necessary be the sentiment of the entire Pakistani government.
@babykay (2131)
• Ireland
21 Jun 07
I hope you are right.
@coolseeds (3919)
• United States
18 Jun 07
It doesn't sound like a secret if they are telling people that it is ok to do it. That is the problem with this world. People are dumb. I don't care what religion it is. If you have to strap a bomb onto yourself to go to heaven then it is not the right religion.
1 person likes this
@abroji (3247)
• India
19 Jun 07
Yes, it is a clear indication of justyfying terrorism. It could even be interpretted as an open call to extinct Rushdi. Such words should not have been uttered by a responsible minister, especially since Pakistan pretends as cooperating with US in the so called war against terror. This surely is contraversory.