is Daniel Craig a better 007 than his predecessor

I think Daniel Craig did a pretty good job with the latest Bond edition despite all criticisms. The movie was very well done and the gadgets more realistic.

I couldn't stand Daniel Craig he spoilt it for me, he is NOT a good Bond and doesn't play the role at all well, Pierce Brosnan is a hundred times better and I was sadly disappointed that he didn't return as 007. Timothy Dalton is my favourite Bond and Daniel Craig is the worst Bond for me.

I wouldn't say that, I think that Pierce was the best here was and wish he stayed on a little longer. Craig is decent but looks nothing like the other bonds, and that makes it hard for me to get into the new movie.

I think Daniel Craig did a pretty good job acting as james Bond. And actually, the way his body looks, and his face figures, makes him look tougher than other james bond.

yes, i think the same way. no hiding the new Bond show us the other side of Bond's personality,but still , i like the old Bond as they are more handsome than the new Bond. hehe.....people always tend to like someone who is good-looking,which is hunman's native habit. happy posting!

You could argue that he is completely different, and therefore they both offer something unique. But, I think Craig's Bond is so different from the rest of the series that it is almose part of a different franchise! I prefer Brosnan, and Connery, Moore, Dalton and Lazenby!

I grew up on Bond having seen over half of all of the films in the theatre.. and the rest of VHS and DVD. I gotta say, I prefer Pierce Brosnan. There is something about him that just screams "All put together" even in an action scene. Part of that might also be that I really enjoyed Remmington Steele, but you never know.