Vista Good for me??

After a great response from darkness01, I choose not to add one of my own. I would just like to add a couple things: Because of Vista's content protection, it may never support Blu Ray or HD DVD. I don't have either of these yet myself, but I intend to, and would like my system to support them when I do. Also, I like to go by the philosophy, "If it's not broke, don't fix it!" XP is quite good enough IMO.

Thankyou for your comments Santuccie. I absolutely agree with you that if its not broke dont fix it and thats why i have no intention of using vista for at least a few years if at all, it offers nothing i dont have with Xp.

oh Sorry i forgot to mention the system config....its a Intel Core 2 Duo e6300 2GB 667 DDR RAM , Intel 965RY Mother board and 7300GT Graphics Card is that enough information ....i just want to escape from windows xp hangs and stucks....thats also a reason why i desperately what to quit win xp....i saw on my friends system that when he was working with the open window of his D drive ....suddenly it freezed ...i thought like in xp we should have to wait...but i was taken aback...just like a linux os it was very responsive , when he hit the close button he was presented with a menu asking him what to do .....The windows is not responding .....wait till the process responds....immediately terminate....etc..etc....wow...that changed my mind.....a lot.....

Another good response! And yes, Vista is more secure out of the box than XP, though still not as secure as Mac or Linux (UNIX), much less OpenBSD, considered the safest of them all. But one advantage XP has over everyone else is that there is soooo much third-party security software available, even for free, that you can actually make it even tougher. Using a NIPS (Network Intrusion Prevention Systems) firewall like Sunbelt or BlackICE (or even the free version of Sunbelt), you can block virtually any attack from the Internet at the network level, before the malicious code has the chance to compile in memory and try to execute. I could write a whole article about the pros and cons of various antivirus and antispyware products, but just to get to my point, all one needs is an ordinary, SPI (Stateful Packet Inspection) firewall to keep hackers from accessing your files, a freebie like Arovax Shield to block changes to browser and system settings, and advanced file security permissions (accessible from Safe Mode) to lock the core in system32 to read-only. Using these three tricks, I get perfect scores across the board in PC Security Test 2006 ( http://www.mylot.com/w/image/1488078.aspx ). I leave the OUGO autobrowser running all night, every night while I'm in bed, then clean up my temp files each morning and continue like nothing ever happened. Ever hear of an invincible Windows PC? Now you have. ;) Salute!

I'm not going to get all anti-Mac on you, but you can't promote Macs while complaining about Vista's compatibility issues. Macs still have limited hardware capabilities and can only run software designed specifically for Mac. Mac equivalents of most PC software cost more money. I bought an old G3 blue and white Mac a couple weeks ago for $30. It's a cute little machine and despite being about 8 years old and going through at least two owners before me, it runs well and does boot faster than most modern PCs. I don't really like the Mac interface, but that's mostly personal preference. I think the worst thing about Mac's interface is the inability to maximize a window to full screen. Why bother having a maximize button if the window won't fill my screen?