The Pet Extinction Act
By Katlady2
@Katlady2 (9904)
United States
June 26, 2007 2:00pm CST
Hi everyone. I am posting this because I am so outraged that anyone could even THINK to come up with a law such as this one. I realize that it is in regard to California (USA) only, but I would really appreciate it if you could find it in your hearts to check this out and maybe even sign the petition if you are able. These wonderful animals mean a lot to people, and this just isn't right. I copied and pasted the article here because I know some of you have a hard time accessing the links sometimes. Again, I appreciate you all taking the time to read this.
COPS Press Release
Contact Monty Holden 800-352-7516
For Release Monday, June 4, 2007 9:00 am pst
PUBLIC SAFETY OPPOSITION TO AB 1634 IS GROWING
Loss of K9 Dogs and Costs to Cities and Counties Cited
The California Organization of Police and Sheriffs (COPS) announced growing opposition to AB 1634, “The Pet Extinction Act” (Levine, D-Van Nuys) because it will decimate police dogs, dogs for the blind, hearing impaired and disabled and is an unfunded state mandate threatening local public safety budgets.
The newest opposition comes from the 25,000 members of the National Coalition of Public Safety Officers (NCPSO) CWA/AFL-CIO along with the California Rescue Dog Association, the largest K9 search-and-rescue organization, the United States Police Canine Association, Western States Police Canine Association, Manteca Police Officers Association, Manteca Police Employees Association, Canine Specialized Search Team, and John Riboni, K9 Training Director for Placer County Sheriffs Department, Roseville Police Department, Lincoln Police Department, and Rocklin Police Department.
AB 1634 will decimate future law enforcement K-9 departments.
At a time when we need more dogs, especially for bomb detection, this bill calls for the extinction of the mixed breed dogs used as working dogs for these duties and drastically reduces the availability of purebred working dogs. The so-called “exemptions” for law enforcement in the bill language do not make sense. Aside from current dogs in service, this legislation does not provide adequate exemption for the next generation of police dogs used for crime prevention, bomb searches, drug detection and search and rescue operations.
COPS Executive Director Monty Holden said, “In addition to eliminating dogs for law enforcement, the blind, hearing impaired and disabled, AB 1634 is an unfunded state mandate costing cities and counties over $1 billion annually. Local public safety funding is put at risk because of the unfunded state mandate in AB 1634.”
Over 50% of cities and counties general fund revenues are budgeted for public safety. AB 1634 will be a financial drain on cities and counties. Mandatory/spay neuter policies previously enacted have seen animal services budgets skyrocket. Law enforcement costs alone will increase by over $42 million if AB 1634 is passed into law.
“All of the major organizations involved with providing K9 dogs to law enforcement officers and blind, hearing impaired and disabled citizens are opposed to this bill because they understand the next generation of dogs will be decimated. AB 1634 will leave our law enforcement officers and blind, hearing impaired and disabled citizens vulnerable to great harm without the assistance of their dogs”, Holden added. For more information go to www.cops.cc XXX
6 people like this
9 responses
@youdontsay (3497)
• United States
26 Jun 07
This sounds like an idea that wasn't thoroughly thought out. I understand the need to control the population of cats and dogs that are on the streets and I support spaying and neutering. But I don't think that the persons comming up with this law foresaw the effect it would have long range. This all-or-nothing kind of thinking is an attempt to oversimplify a solution to one problem without looking at how it causes other problems.
I would think that working dogs would be better workers if they were spayed or neutered. So I see no problem with that. But the idea of only using purebred animals must have come from breeders who make their money breeding purebred animals. There is nothing wrong with mixed-breed animals. Why try to prevent them?
Makes no sense.
@pyewacket (43903)
• United States
27 Jun 07
Just signed the petition...hey I'm great at signing petitions....I understand CA is coming up with a lot of stupid proposed bills they want to pass...NY probably won't be far behind
1 person likes this
@Katlady2 (9904)
• United States
27 Jun 07
Yeah, I am proud to be a Californian, but that doesn't mean I have to agree with all the stupidity going on here. I read on one site that Rhode Island passed a law similar to this one. So I wouldn't be surprised if it spreads across the states quickly. UGH! Thanks hon.
@castleghost (1304)
• United States
27 Jun 07
I had no problem at all signing this petition. I don't that who ever wrote this bill was being very logical at all. There are some good points as well as many bad points. I would hope that this bill gets stopped before it goes any further.
1 person likes this
@brendalee (6082)
• United States
27 Jun 07
Well, I'm sure you know how mad this makes me. And I signed the petition. Here is the link to the petition so it will be easier for anyone who wants to sign it....
http://cops.cc/get_involved/petitions/ab_1634
1 person likes this
@blondbat (503)
• United States
26 Jun 07
I heard this proposed a few months ago and thought it was ill-thought out then. Certainly there needs to be more responsibility in caring for animals and the over-population of stray animals is horrendous, but this is waay over the edge.
I am not saying that it isn't expensive to handle the unwantd pet population, but this is NOT the way to do it. I started a discussion on this topic a few months back, but I would have to find it again...
@whimsystoryteller (1743)
• United States
27 Jun 07
I've already expressed my opposition to my representatives about this. There's actually more to it than this. They are trying to force people to spay/neuter their animals by four months old or be fined. I find this idea ludicrous because if we spay and neuter all pets, eventually they will all die out and we won't have any animals to enjoy. Whoever wrote this is crazy! Believe it or not, the Humane Society is in favor of passing this thing. Unbelievable! I think we need national outcry to stop animal extremists from taking their ideas too far!