Elective c-section, is it wrong?

@birthlady (5609)
United States
October 24, 2006 10:26pm CST
Some pregnant women decide they want to have a baby by c-section. Do you think this is wrong?
10 people like this
47 responses
@Karinne (1220)
• Australia
4 Nov 06
Hi there birthlady! I think it's the mothers choice. I had an elective c-section and i don't regret having one. I had my sister inlaw carry on and on about it saying they wouldn't give me one and my gp wrote out a referal for a specialist. As i said it's the mothers choice on how she wants to deliver her baby and other people should mind their own business about it.
4 people like this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
4 Nov 06
Hi! Thanks for responding! Are there reasons you chose an elective c-section? Actually, in the USA, the ACOG (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists), which sets standards of care in the USA, has an opinion about the topic!
1 person likes this
@eden32 (3973)
• United States
6 Mar 07
Although I respect a woman's right to choose what's best for her & her family; I wish women would see how illogical it is to cut for convience. The risks to mom & to baby are very real and much more than I think most people realize. Just because sectioning is common it does not negate that it's still major surgery & carries major risks.
@erielle (1280)
• United States
25 Oct 06
Of course not. It is the mother's choice. I don't see anything wrong with it.
3 people like this
• United States
4 Nov 06
I agree. I probably would have had one if I knew you could choose.
2 people like this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
4 Nov 06
Why?
1 person likes this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
24 Nov 06
The cesearean birth rate in the USA is higher than ever before in history. Obstetricians are performing "elective" c-sections without medical or obstetric indications, simply at a mother's request. C-section birth is major surgery, and anyone who has recovered from both c-section birth and vag birth, will explain the difference as being more painful, and having more complications. Especially common are infections of the incision.
1 person likes this
• United States
25 Oct 06
I believe it is completely up to the parents of the child. Mainly the mothers choice since she will be the one in all the pain.
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
4 Nov 06
Greeting Cards - Holidays are coming, shop online at Art by Cathie http://www.cafepress.com/artbycathie
C-section is major surgery. The recovery time from major surgery is longer than recover from vag birth. Many mothers experience prolonged pain in the area of the healing incision from c-section, along with sore muscles.
• United States
4 Nov 06
cute bunny - cute bunny
It's the mother's choice, however a c-section is a major surgery. I think it should only be performed if medically necessary. I know some insurance companies will only cover it if it was necessary as well.
3 people like this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
24 Nov 06
Thank you for responding.
1 person likes this
• United States
13 Nov 06
Not at all, my wife had to have a C-Section the first time because our son became too big for her tiny body to go natural. Over a year later, she elected to have a C for our daughter, the doctors said it was much safer that way.
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
13 Nov 06
Kudos to you! I am 5'6'' and birthed vag 3 babies: 9lb 6 oz 22 in; 10 lb 24 in; 8 lb 8oz 21 in!
1 person likes this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
24 Nov 06
The pelvis size and shape of a woman does affect whether or not a c-section will be necessary.
1 person likes this
@Pigglies (9329)
• United States
24 Nov 06
I've heard that can depend on the type of hips a woman has too, not solely their size.
1 person likes this
@aleddon (141)
• United States
13 Nov 06
I say it's the mom's body, she should do what she feels comfortable with. Me, I was terrified of labor when I had my first child, but even more scared of a c section. I would not want one.
3 people like this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
24 Nov 06
A c-section is major surgery.
1 person likes this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
25 Nov 06
Hon, a woman's body is made to give birth, and pregnancy causes tissues to soften and to be able to give birth. "Elective" means "by choice" without medical reasons or without obstetric reasons. But if your baby is too big for your pelvis, your obstetricians are making the right decision to deliver you by c-section. I do know one young woman who was induced in labor 2 weeks early because her baby was "big" and she delivered vag an 8 1/2 pound baby boy. She was 18 she and baby are fine.
1 person likes this
• United States
25 Nov 06
I think its fine having a c-section..im 16 nd im havin a baby in april nd i thi nk i have to have a c-section cuz the bab is too big..nd the insurance should cover Elective c-section..its the mothers choice besides id rather have a c-section cuz it wont feel like ur pushin a watermelon out of an apple!!
3 people like this
• United States
25 Nov 06
I don't think it's wrong. I had an emergency csection and to be honest.. I recovered faster than my friends who had natural births. One of my friends even ripped their episiotomy (sp). They couldn't sit forever and I was moving around and going places. I think it's up to the mother and no one has a right to judge.
2 people like this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
25 Nov 06
No one is judging. An emergency c-section is life saving for mother/baby or both. An elective c-section is when there are no problems, there's not an emergency, mom just doesn't want to go through labor, doesn't want to deliver vag, or schedules for convienance.
1 person likes this
@ChewySpree (1832)
• United States
4 Nov 06
I think it's wrong to have a c-section unless it's medically necessary. If a woman chooses to have elective surgery, her insurance shouldn't cover it.
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
13 Nov 06
Especially because an elective c-section involves two patients: the preborn baby and mother. Labor and vag birthing have advantages for newborns adjusting to extra-uterine life.
1 person likes this
@babykay (2131)
• Ireland
12 Feb 07
So Crabby....are you suggesting that a woman should have herself cut open across her abdomen, through skin, flesh, muscle and womb so that she is tighter for her husband/partner?????? A man who would stray due to the elasticity (or lack of) his partner's muscles is going to find an excuse to stray no matter what measures are taken and frankly if I was with such a man the sooner they strayed, the better. This seems to me to be misogynistic in the extreme and I have never heard a more ridiculous reason for suggesting a caesarean section. I think it should be up to the woman having the baby, but I believe that all outcomes should be explained first - knowledge is power.
@lifeis2good (1183)
• United States
25 Nov 06
I definitely think it's wrong to be able to schedule your child's birth - like you can't allow the baby to take it's own precious time to arrive when they are ready. But then that's just my opinion. I had to have an emergency c-section due to placenta abruptia - so I had no choice in the matter - and they wouldn't even let me be awake for it as I had lost so much blood so they put me out compeletly - it was a horrible experience!!! I think that no one should be able to schedule one - if things are going well and there's no medical reason for it - it's just wrong to me - but that's my opinion!!!!
2 people like this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
25 Nov 06
I'm glad you were taken care of quickly and you are here to talk about it!
3 people like this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
25 Nov 06
Thank you! Placenta abrupta is definately a life threatening emergency to both yourself and your baby, thank you for sharing.
3 people like this
• United States
25 Nov 06
You are so welcome!!!! I know - I really was scared about it - since everyone I had known who had one always was able to get an epidural and remain awake - and then they come in and tell me sorry - you have lost way too much blood and it would be more dangerous to allow you to remain awake!!!
2 people like this
@shooie (4984)
• United States
25 Nov 06
I had a friend that had to have a C-Section and she had no probs and was up and about quicker
2 people like this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
25 Nov 06
Your friend was up and about quicker than...?
2 people like this
@marthab (325)
• United States
25 Nov 06
A c-section is a major operation so some feel the woman should not be allowed to choose. It is true there are risks but there are risks in everything. I think people who scream for a woman's right to birth the way she wants (meaning unmedicated, with few interventions etc) should realize that not everyone wants that. Some women want c-sections, medication, sceduled inductions etc. If you are going to scream for choice, you need to respect all choices.
2 people like this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
25 Nov 06
I totally disagree with you. Choice in unmedicated childbirth with few interventions, is because this is the most physiologically healthy type of birthing for mother and baby meeting all low risk factors' criteria. Medical and obstetric interventions due to obstetric or medical risk factors are valid reasons for their use.
1 person likes this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
25 Nov 06
Well, the reasons why an individual would care how another individual gives birth is because of the high cost of medical care in the USA, and for health reasons of mother and child. Another reason is the outcome of pregnancy affects everyone in a society.
1 person likes this
@marthab (325)
• United States
25 Nov 06
Why do you care how I choose to give birth? Shouldn't I have the right to make choices just like you can?
1 person likes this
• United States
28 Nov 06
My mother ahd three of them. She had the choice with the last two. I think they can be ok. They are safer for the baby than they are the mother.
2 people like this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
28 Nov 06
c-sections are safer for baby than for mother? Mother goes through major surgery, but there are things that affect baby also when born by c-section, such as not having the benefit of being pushed through the birth canal, which helps get amniotic fluid out of the lungs of the baby.
• United States
25 Nov 06
Not really,....But we should encourage natural ways ........
2 people like this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
25 Nov 06
Thank you for sharing.
2 people like this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
25 Nov 06
I also believe we should encourage natural ways to give birth. I am always shocked at what people believe is a "natural" birth.
2 people like this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
25 Nov 06
I also believe we should encourage natural ways to give birth. I am always shocked at what people believe is a "natural" birth.
2 people like this
@arman9890 (452)
• India
28 Nov 06
well cant say.. That is individual's choice what they want..
2 people like this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
28 Nov 06
Even if it involves unnecessary health risks and ends up increasing the costs of medical/obstetric care for everyone else?
• United States
4 Nov 06
I think it's up to the woman. I don't think the baby or the mother are being hurt in any way. If she does decide to have the c-section she is the one that has to live with the consequences of scarring or pain for the rest of her life. I don't think it's wrong! What is wrong is inducing labor just to have the baby born on a certain day! My dad's daughter(that I don't like!) had her son on my dad's b-day! Now that is rediculous!
2 people like this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
4 Nov 06
C-section babies have varying outcomes at birth compared to vag delivered babies, depending on reason for c-section (elective vs. maternal/fetal indications); whether or not labor contractions were allowed to establish and for how long; as well as having the effects of maternal medications crossing the placenta (which is also a factor in medicated/non medicated outcomes in vag delivered babies). Placental circulation is fetal circulation.
1 person likes this
@beckyomg1 (6756)
• United States
25 Nov 06
yes and no. my first child i was going to go natural but could not dilate. so i had to have c section, but on my second child i decided to have another c section only because i wanted my tubes tied also.
2 people like this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
25 Nov 06
Were you allowed to go into labor at all before your second child was born by c-section?
2 people like this
@Vallie26 (349)
• United States
13 Nov 06
I don't think it's wrong at all,it's ultimately the mother's decision. When I have children I will,due to spina bifida,have to have a c-section. There is no choice in it for me. So I respect that it is a choice for other women.
2 people like this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
24 Nov 06
Medical and obstetric indications are good valid reasons to have a c-section.
1 person likes this
@tiff1496 (570)
• United States
13 Nov 06
Maybe not wrong, but NOT the best thing to do. I have had 2 csections. The first one was emergency and the doctors had to do a T-cut on my uterus. They then told me I would need to have a section with every child because of the chance of uterine rupture.
2 people like this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
24 Nov 06
Thank you for responding!
1 person likes this
@ebsharer (5515)
• United States
25 Nov 06
i dont agree with it but i dont think that its wrong either. i know that i would never do an elective c section but i can i guess understand someones reason to have on done.
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
25 Nov 06
What are some of the reasons you would understand?
2 people like this
@algrose (816)
• Canada
25 Nov 06
I think a c-section should only be done if theres a concern about the baby or mothers health.
2 people like this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
25 Nov 06
thank you for responding, i agree with you.
2 people like this