Babies in Violent Movies
@LilyoftheThorns (12918)
United States
July 16, 2007 1:50am CST
I get so mad when I see parents bringing toddlers (ages 4+) into violent, gory, scary movies. I think it is so stupid and I feel so sorry for those children. They don't need to, and probably want to see stuff like that. But toddlers and older children aren't the worst of it for me. I also think it is terrible when even small babies (1-2) are brought into these kinds of movies.
Me and my dad have different opinions about small babies in violent movies. When we went to 300 I saw a couple with a small baby and I told him I thought it was stupid. But he said it isnt as bad because the baby wouldnt really understand it. But I disagree, I think babies understand more than we think. They recognize people, so I think they would recognize when someone is being hurt and killed. I think they'll recognize someones head falling off their shoulders(which happens in the movie), they might not know the full exstent of it but they understand it is happening and that it isn't right.
What do you guys think about babies being brought into these violent movies? Do you agree with me or my dad?
6 people like this
13 responses
@raychill (6525)
• United States
16 Jul 07
I agree more with your dad I must say. I personally do not have any children but as I always say when I answer children related subjects...I was a kid once. When I was a child I read R.L. Stine books. Not the "goosebumps" type things, they weren't out yet and when they did come out I thought they were lame. Not scary enough. I'd read the fear street kind. Granted I was maybe 6 or so when i was doing this... but the point is these were TEEN HORROR books. I loved them!
So that's books... not movies, but I'm just pointing out that I read books as a child too, not just movies.
I loved horror movies and scary movies and violent movies. I haven't grown up to murder anyone yet. Nor do I ever plan on murdering people. I don't even like to kill bugs. How could I kill an animal or a person?
I didn't have nightmares. I just enjoyed these movies. Granted my first movie in the theaters was Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.. so I was about 7 or 8. I watched these movies at home prior to that.
My brother took his almost 4 year old son to see Transformers. His son saw Spiderman 2 and 3 I believe in the theaters too. Granted, they're no Nightmare on Elm street or 300, but he watches those kinds of things at home.
The boy loves it. I loved it.
I don't think there's anything wrong with it, unless the child can't handle it... and you should know your child.You can teach your child real and make believe. You can teach your child right from wrong.
Besides, if a child is around to hear/watch the news... nothing is more violent than whats happening in real life.
1 person likes this
@Foxxee (3651)
• United States
17 Jul 07
Well, Transformers & Spiderman, isn't really all that bad. I think she was more talking about the more scarier kinds of movies.
It takes common sense. I mean I have a little boy and even a daugher and I don't think nothing is wrong with Transformers or Spiderman, but the other movies that will show someones head being blown off, is something different and a child shouldn't be allowed even if the parents think different. I think all movie places should have rules about this. I knwo the ones here do and even if a parent is there, they have a right to tell the parents to leave or come back (without the kids).
1 person likes this
@LilyoftheThorns (12918)
• United States
17 Jul 07
I think my nieces would love to watch Transformers, but I wouldnt take them to it in theaters. I'll get it on DVD and then watch it with them...there are some parts they'd get bored with so I would skip them. I think my nieces would love the good bots. Even if something looks scary to them, if I tell them it is good then they won't be scared of it.
1 person likes this
@raychill (6525)
• United States
17 Jul 07
To clarify I did say "Granted, they're no Nightmare on Elm street or 300, but he watches those kinds of things at home."
which basically meant, I know they aren't that bad!
Then I said that he watches those kinds of things at home.
Movies have the MPAA ratings as a way of having rules for what a child can or can not see. If a parent so chooses to take their child to see movies with peoples head being blown off, I think that's their choice. On top of that, as I also said, if your child hears or watches the news they're hearing about the violence in real life which is so much worse than make believe violence.
1 person likes this
@brokentia (10389)
• United States
17 Jul 07
Babies or young children period should not be in movies like that.
And I think you are very right, at some point a babies does know when someone gets hurt and that huge screen displaying it is sure to attract their short attention span.
I had taken my children at a very young age to see a Disney movie in the theater. I was fearful of them not having an attention span long enough to sit through an entire movie. But they surprised me! Not only did they make it through the whole movie, I didn't have to say anything to them!!! They paid attention and didn't fall asleep!!!!
Young children should NOT be in violent movies. They really do understand more than what we believe.
1 person likes this
@LilyoftheThorns (12918)
• United States
17 Jul 07
My nieces are, for the most part, good in movies too. Even if they get bored with a movie they will sit patiently and just wait lol. They are very well bahaived in public.
1 person likes this
@Foxxee (3651)
• United States
17 Jul 07
I didn't think they allowed kids of that age into a movie like 300 or any scary movie at that, even if a parent is there.
I know the movie place here has a sign that says "NO CHILDREN ALLOWED IN WITH OR WITHOUT PARENTS FOR THE FALLOWING: RATED R, PG-13, OR NC-17 RATED MOVIES!"
So I agree with you and I think most movie places do as well.
It shouldn't be up to a parent in a case like this. I think it's awful to have even a child who is 1, 2, 3 or even 8 in a movie place with the parents or not, watching a movie with the above rates.
1 person likes this
@LilyoftheThorns (12918)
• United States
17 Jul 07
Here, if a parent is with a child of any age then it can go into in movie, which I think is terrible...but it's how it works here =/ Sometimes I just want to walk up to the parents, give them my number and say "next time think about bringing you baby to a horror movie call me and I'll babysit for you."
1 person likes this
@sunshinecup (7871)
•
16 Jul 07
Yes I agree about the violence, but my main beef is the volume of the theater hurting such small tender ears. They crank that stuff up so loud that I have literally sat through the movie with my fingers in my ears. I can't imagine what that is like for a small baby that can't do that and doesn't understand what in the world is going on. I wonder if colors have an effect on brain development, what can this be doing to them? It's stupid, find a baby setter and come to the movie or wait and get it on DVD.
@LilyoftheThorns (12918)
• United States
16 Jul 07
Yeah exactly! When I go to movies in IMAX (that's where I saw the very young baby in 300-an IMAX theater!) I plug my ears for the first few minutes and it is still so loud! But it helps me get used to it slowly! That poor baby doesn't have the knowledge to plug it's ears! And both its mommy and daddy were there! They can take turns going with friends, shouldn't bring baby!
If I ever got pregnant on accident I would never bring the baby to a movie. I would watch a movie at my house while it napped! I could deal with that, and I could wait for dvds. Thankfully for me though my parents would probably watch her every once in a while for me so I could go out. But I would never force my baby to go to something it couldn't enjoy.
@brokentia (10389)
• United States
17 Jul 07
Oh wow Sunshinecup! You make an excellent point!!! I don't go to the movies that often because we wait for it to come to DVD. But I do recall how often I have had to plug my ears or moved back in the seats hoping it would lessen the sound.
And I also used to get upset at my partner playing the music too loud when we had babies in the car. ha ha
Babies are more sensitive! They are smaller and not used to the horrible noises we have been exposed to. For that reason alone, I would completely agree that babies should not be allowed in the theater! :)
@carpenter5 (6782)
• United States
16 Jul 07
We were really careful when my kids were little about what we allowed them to watch. We still are in some cases, even though the girls are 17 and 18. We are still the parents after all.
Once when my middle child spent the night with a friend, she was allowed to watch a movie that I'd have never approved in our home, or the theater. For weeks after that, she would wake up screaming in a nightmare. She was 5 years old and had been allowed to watch a horror movie!
So you tell me if they remember or not.
I agree with you.
@Foxxee (3651)
• United States
17 Jul 07
I can feel you there!
I was in the hospital having my son and my sister had my daughter who was 3 at the time almost 4. Well she thought it was okay to watch the movie called "The Grudge" and a few days after I was home, my daughter was having nightmares and was afraid to take a bath or use the bathroom. I didn't understand, she kept saying "The baby in the toilet."
My sister told me that she didn't have a scary movie on at all, but my cable bill said that the movie was ordered and I asked again and she said "Well she was asleep, so she didn't see it."
But then a while later, the preview of the movie came on and my daughter was like "That is the scary baby mom that I seen on TV with aunty and uncle."
The little boy in the movie, my daughter called him the scary baby. And there was a part in the movie where he was in the bathtub.
So, yes, kids remember. My daughter is about to be 5 soon and still talks about the movie at times. ANd the sad thing is, she even had a baby doll that had black hair and she didn't want it anymore because the little boy in the movie had black hair.
So, some kids might be able to handle it and some don't, but either way, its bad for kids to watch.
1 person likes this
@LilyoftheThorns (12918)
• United States
16 Jul 07
Oh my gosh! Did her friends parents ask you if she could watch it? Do you remember which movie it was?
My parents restricted my movies until I was about 16! Now I'm pretty much free to see any movie I want. But, I limit myself. There are some movie previews I see and I say to myself "No way, I couldn't handle seeing that," like the movies Saw. I saw the preview for Hostel and I told myself I couldn't go to that because I don't like torture movies. Well my dad talked me into going...and I regret it a lot!
1 person likes this
@LilyoftheThorns (12918)
• United States
17 Jul 07
THE GRUDGE! Oh my goodness! I couldn't even handle the grudge, it is SCARY and quite graphic! I can't believe her aunt let her watch that! I would never let my nieces watch such a terrible movie! I can't watch that movie again because it was too scary for me!
1 person likes this
@CoffeeAnyone (3210)
• Canada
17 Jul 07
I feel sick when I see this. I always wish I could phone the authorities and have them arrested and their child taken away from them. Sounds so extreme I know but really what kind of parents do this? My gosh what a stupid thing to say that babies don't understand! Sorry no offense to your Dad when I didn't know better I thought the same thing. Why oh why bring a baby to a scary movie where the sound is so loud and they are hearing all those horrible sounds so loudly? It must be very scary for them? Think of a loud noise; something falls to the floor creating a bang and the little baby jumps out of its skin and starts screaming! There should at least be a rule that no babies can go to the movie theater for any movie. Even childrens movies the sound is extremely loud and can be scary for a child.
1 person likes this
@LilyoftheThorns (12918)
• United States
17 Jul 07
Yeah exactly! And the worst thing is the babies don't have a say in it! They can't tell their parents they don't want to see it, they can't say "no I'm sacred..." even though they are!
1 person likes this
@danishcanadian (28955)
• Canada
12 Jun 08
I think that babies are capable of perceiing that something "bad" is going on, and hey don't realize that i's only pretend. They don't know what pretnd is, so they think their parents are bringing them into a traumatic environment. This kind of experience could accet them for life!
@LilyoftheThorns (12918)
• United States
13 Jun 08
Yeah defeniatly! Babies don't know what special effects are, they don't know what actors are. They don't know what movies are! lol. But they know that people shouldn't be falling all around them, and that heads should stay ON bodies. I would never bring my baby to a violent movie!
@krishkorp (427)
• India
16 Jul 07
Am with you on this issue lily simply because when children are small they are so observant and imitating all the time(which is part of growing up!).So if they are seeing a violent movie that is definitely going to leave an impression on their tender minds.
I definitely wouldn't recommend a toddler seeing a scary or a violent movie.:)
@ravinskye (8237)
• United States
16 Jul 07
Well, i think younger than 2 that they probably don't fully grasp what they are seeing. That doesn't mean that i let me kids watch that sort of stuff though. I don't see why people take their kids to the movies that young. if we couldn't find family to watch our kids, we just didn't go. we are still in search of a babysitter. I've tried to keep my kids from seeing a lot of stuff like that though. its hard sometimes because they show bad stuff on commercials now too.
@Rozie37 (15499)
• Turkmenistan
16 Jul 07
Well, I have no choice but to agree with you, since I don't think that violent movies should be made at all. Unless they have a point, like the telling of a historical event or something like that.
The only thing worst to me is when children are allowed to star in violent pictures. No amount of money in the world would make me want to take the chance of exposing my child to such a movie, but you know what they say, Money talks and ...
@Amstardam (1348)
• United States
16 Jul 07
Well, I guess ultimately it's up to the parents if they want to bring their child into a violent movie or not. I think it can be very scary for small children. But I also realize that these parents may not censor the television at home. So it wouldn't really make a difference if the child saw it at home or in the theater. If parents are conscious enough to talk to their kids about violence and its affect on society then perhaps that would change ones opinion on it. I don't know. I would have to see parents reasoning on bringing a child. Perhaps the child isn't scared by things like that. I don't think I'd bring my son into a scary movie but he's only one and I think it would impact him in a bad way.
@sharonercastillo (888)
• Philippines
16 Jul 07
i agree with you that babies shouldn't be brought in to those kind of movie, actually kids under three years old shoudn't be brought to movie theater at all, or in any close crowded area for that matter, i dont know, but for me i think of my safety of my kid first,.. i believe there are some studies that violent scene from movie or games affect the child later in life....