Woman Claiming to be Kids Mother
By worldwise1
@worldwise1 (14885)
United States
August 16, 2007 1:44pm CST
I am having a hard time wrapping my mind around this case of the 36-year-old London woman, Nona Paris Lola Jackson, who is claiming to be the mother of all three of his children. I first heard about this about a year ago when she tried to sue for custody. She has made three attempts with the case being thrown out each time. She has even gone so far as to ask that his previous marriages to Debbie Rowe and Lisa Marie Presley be dissolved. In her latest attempt the judge ruled that she does not have sufficient evidence. This is very strange since Debbie Rowe has always been acknowledged as the mother of the two older children. Michael has never revealed the name of the mother of the youngest child.
3 people like this
6 responses
@worldwise1 (14885)
• United States
16 Aug 07
Yes, that's right mistissa, she claims that she can prove she's the mother by DNA-but, why has she not done so? And, I would like to know where the money is coming from to file all of the lawsuits???
@GyurlTrini (67)
• Trinidad And Tobago
23 Aug 07
yes it can ... she should have asked for that first before trying to take him to court to get a house and land.
If she was serious about being their mother, why didn't she do that? Why didn't she try to claim parental rights instead of house and land?
1 person likes this
@starchild321 (5)
• United States
11 Sep 07
I agree with DNA testing. That would prove all of it. Besides if she is just a surrogate for the youngest child and that can be proving, those rights were signed over. Why pull this after all this time? What's really going on?
@GyurlTrini (67)
• Trinidad And Tobago
23 Aug 07
lol ... I think this is a lot of bs ... I think everyone knows that Debbie Rowe is the biological mother of his first two children ... every one saw photographs of her being pregnant while she was with Michael. What is she trying to say? Is she trying to say that Debbie was wearing a pregnancy pad to make it look like she (Debbie) was the one who was pregnant while she (Nona)was really the one who was pregnant for Michael? That's just a little too bizarre! And doesn't sound at all logical.
If it were me, I imagine, if I had a child for someone such as Michael, I wouldn't go for the money and property, I'd want parental / custody rights and I'd want to know that my child is well cared for financially, along with a perhaps a stipend of some sort to help keep me living the sort of life I'm used to (not to improve my status, but just to help pay bills).
@worldwise1 (14885)
• United States
23 Aug 07
Your statements make perfect sense, GT. If this woman's cases have been thrown out three times, I would think that she should get the message by now.
@worldwise1 (14885)
• United States
16 Aug 07
Absolutely, pismeof! It was noted that she asked to be given Neverland Ranch and another large property that Michael owns. I think it's about the money also.
@Candid_Ishida (659)
• United States
29 Aug 07
This sounds like just another case of someone trying to take advantage of Michael and get his money, just like all the others... If she had claimed to be Blanket's mother, it might seem more believable since the identity of that mother has never been revealed, as far as I know. Also, where was this woman for all the years the children have been around?? She has never been heard of before and now suddenly appears, claiming to be their mother. Finding any truth in this claim seems highly unlikely...
Since Michael is such a generous, seemingly eccentric and perhaps naive person, people target him as an easy person to get money from, since he is also, of course, incredibly wealthy. Ugh, all these people filing lawsuits are ridiculous and I hope they get what is coming to them...
@Feona1962 (7526)
• United States
23 Aug 07
This woman sounds a little whacko..Just have a DNA test and be done with it already. These types of people are getting way to much attention for the stupidest stuff.
