Do you rank every user on their posts and comments?
By AnjaP
@Rollo1 (16679)
Boston, Massachusetts
August 18, 2007 10:33pm CST
I am new here and confess I haven't been hitting the rating on posters because I didn't know what it was. Now I think I understand it, but I also see that some very good posters have no rating. I also saw someone who had only just started here and had very few posts with a 10 rating. How is that possible? Usually the higher rankings are on mylotters with lots of posts to their credit.
Are you more likely to rate your friends or do you rate everyone or no one? I am going to try to remember to rate people so that the good commenters and posters are rewarded, but I wondered if most people do the ratings or don't do them.
4 people like this
8 responses
@patgalca (18370)
• Orangeville, Ontario
19 Aug 07
You don't get a star rating until you have reached 100 points. I rate as many people as possible. As long as they have put some thought into their answer and responded with more than a few words, I will usually give them a positive rating. Those who respond to discussions knowing nothing about the discussion saying "I don't know about this" usually get a negative rating. If the discussion doesn't interest you then don't respond.
You have raised a good question because I can't help but wonder whether people are giving me positive ratings outside of the best response mark.
3 people like this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
19 Aug 07
I agree with that, about not responding unless you have something to say, and I don't care if you agree or disagree with what I post. I had one discussion that I started and my first response from someone was "I don't care. Am not that concerned about it". When I went back to rate the responses, that one should have got a negative, but I couldn't make myself do it, I hate to give anyone bad marks, would rather just not mark them at all.
1 person likes this
@foxyfire33 (10005)
• United States
19 Aug 07
No one gets a rating at all until the have 100 posts. Even some users with more than that have lost their star ratings by getting too many -'s or being involved in questionable activities on here. That's rare but I have seen it happen.
My first star here was a 9. The amount of time a person has been here and the number of posts they've made doesn't factor into what rating they get. There are people with many more posts than me that have very low ratings. It all depends on how many +'s and -'s they get.
I forget to rate quite often but I do make sure to rate really good posts and really bad posts. It doesn't matter to me if they are friends or not.
2 people like this
@foxyfire33 (10005)
• United States
19 Aug 07
It does happen. I've seen where users got into a disagreement and one marked everything the other person had ever posted with a - out of spite or to be vindictive.
Being diagreable isn't a guarantee that you'll get lots of -'s. A lot of people will respect you more for sticking up for your opinions. It's all in the delivery. If you disagree in a tactful and polite way, it usually turns out alright. The -'s come if you get insulting or argumentative. From what I've seen so far I think you'll be just fine!
1 person likes this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
19 Aug 07
Yeah, it didn't take me long to figure out that there is often some controversy here between posters and I have seen posts about questionable activities.
Makes you wonder though, if people give out negative ratings just because they disagree with you. As I am somewhat disagreeable at times, I expect that would affect me a lot. :)
2 people like this
@mssnow (9484)
• United States
20 Aug 07
I rate everyones discussion that I answer. I also rate everyone who answers me.It helps me keep track of discussions I have already answered so I dont go back and answer them twice. I normally give a plus unless the person, is mean or doesn't follow the rules. I think anyone who takes the time to answer my discussions deserves a plus. It is a good idea to rate. it helps the people who do a good job(with a positive) as well as those who don't follow rules (witha negative). By the way welcome to mylot!!
@coolseeds (3919)
• United States
19 Aug 07
I rate a lot of people. Usually if someone is on my friends list I give them a +. I think a lot of the people who have a lot of posts and a 10 have so many +s credited to their name it is hard to move it down. It is kind of like money. If you have $1,000 and you lose one it isn't as significant as if you only had $10.
2 people like this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
19 Aug 07
I suppose that's true and I think that people definitely should be rewarded for postings that actually contribute something, even if it's not in agreement with the originator of the discussion. When I see that someone has started 20 new discussions and they are all like "What's your favorite color?" or "What did you eat for dinner?", I can see why they have such a large number after their names, but they don't really add anything useful. The only thing I probably wouldn't do a lot is give negative ratings.
2 people like this
@youless (112496)
• Guangzhou, China
19 Aug 07
Some time ago I finally learned the importance to rank the posts and comments. Some people are not nice here and they just give negative marks. So some people's star gets lower. I want to change this unfair situation. So I have always rank positive to the posts and comments.
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
19 Aug 07
That's how I feel about it too, I will do the rating so that people don't get pushed out by negative people. I feel most people who respond deserve positive marks because most are thoughtful comments of a decent length and not done just to earn points.
1 person likes this
@faith210 (11224)
• Philippines
19 Aug 07
Hi Rollo1! I do rate all discussions and responses with a positive rating. I may not agree on the comments and I might find the discussion not to my liking but I always consider the effort made by each myLotter in posting,rsponding and commenting on each discussion made. When I was new here I really didn't mind the star rating but I was told it was given to myLotters when they respond with quality. As for me, I am after the quality and quantity of the responses I post. Even they are not in my friends' list if they deserve to be rated also as best remark, I give it to them. These were all advices given to me by other myLotters when I was new here too. Take care and have a nice day! Happy myLotting!
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
19 Aug 07
Thanks for your input, faith. Now that I am getting to know my way around a bit, I think that I will be active in rating responses. But I also think that I will negatively rate those who respond only to push up their numbers, if they give responses that clearly indicate that they either didn't read the post or they didn't care to respond about it. Just saying "I don't care" or "That's interesting" - to me, that isn't really contributing.
1 person likes this
@raijin (10345)
• Philippines
20 Aug 07
I rate people who respond to my discussions, that's my way of thanking them and spending their time and effort to respond to my post. Seldom do I start a discussion, that I am thankful to some of my friends that would take a peek to it and respond if ever they have something to say. I give them (+) whenever I see them making good points on my topic, leave some if their posts don't make any sense to me.
The ratings has been introduced many months ago, some got 1, 9 and 10. I don't think the star ratings are just for old members here, I believe it is given to those who deserves to have it and who works hard for it.
@senthil2k (1500)
• India
19 Aug 07
If I find the response to be really good or the topics started are very good, then I will definitely rate the topic as well as the user. There are many topics here that I rated which are both meaningful and are more interesting as well.
Generally I dont rate the topics such as "where are you from?", "what is your age?" etc.
1 person likes this