Dhoni V/s Afridi

India
August 28, 2007 12:58pm CST
Who do u think is the best...dhoni or afridi? I personally belive dhoni is a better batsman than afridi while afridi is a better allrounder than dhoni. What is ur opinon about this topic??
8 responses
• India
28 Aug 07
dhoni is young n a joyfull player as he's new too. but yeah! his ranking going higher! as his achievements! a nive batsman! upon whom country can stau at critical moments in matches........... dunno much about afridi..........but ssen his performance once!.... he's fast player! wid needed concentration! both can't be compared! so better keep them on their roles! n cheer! dhoni-me-dho-daala
2 people like this
@ajithlal (14716)
• India
6 Sep 07
Dhoni wallpapers and dhoni hitting sixes http://teamindiadhoni1.blogspot.com/
• India
6 Sep 07
Dhoni can play aggressivly and if necessary he can play anchor role.Afridi is just a pinch hitter he is useful only in flat pitches as a batsmen.But he can bowl so he is useful in onedayers.Also i think Dhoni should be condidered as an allrounder since he is awicket keeper batsmen.
2 people like this
@amitavroy (4819)
• India
28 Aug 07
I totally agree with you that dhoni is a better batsmen. But he as he is not the best among the two when you compare it an all-round dimension. afridi is a good all-rounder because he is a good batsmen and a bowler and whenever he feilds he is a very safe person. So all in all he is a better contributor to the team than the other and I feel now days our Indian wicketkeeper is not performing the standard he should. Even in the yesterday's match he got out of is cheaply and irresponsibly when he should have continued for a bigger innings and secured a win for his country anyways in our country players go high quickly and then come down quickly also. So let's hope he begins form and come back quickly
1 person likes this
@mageshis (183)
• India
1 Sep 07
Both are not a situation players, they play only when ball comes to the bat that is not a sign for a good batsmen.
1 person likes this
@sgarjun (123)
• India
29 Aug 07
If we compare both of them in batting Dhoni is far better than afridi. Dhoni not only powerful hitter of the ball but also plays careful according to the situation. But afridi can't play according to the situation. And we cannot campare them in bowling because Dhoni is a wiket-keeper and afridi is a bowler.
1 person likes this
@ashar123 (2357)
• India
29 Aug 07
In my opinion Shahid Afridi is far more better as a batsman and bowler. His fielding is also great which makes him far more good all rounder too. I know Shahid Afridi besides his batting is a spinner but he has helped his team in breaking valuable partnerships when his team needed it the most.
1 person likes this
• India
8 Sep 07
hmm i think dhoni is gud oneeee
@ajithlal (14716)
• India
6 Sep 07
I think both are very good batsman and both are entirely different. Both Afridi and Dhoni are very good striker of bowls. When Afridi strikes the ball it cover more distance than any other batsman. Dhoni is more consistent in hitting the balls than Afridi when in good form. I am looking forward to see both Afridi and Dhoni performing in the shorter version of the game or Twenty-Twenty.
29 Aug 07
both are best players of their teams.dhoni is the best batsman and wicketkeeper of indian team.where afridi is the best alrouder of his team.both are fast players.but even i belive that dhoni is a best batsman.because i like the way he plays.he plays with power and technic.