Did SHAHID AFRIDI really deserve to be the Man of the T-20 WC..?!?!
By innocent_dr
@innocent_dr (539)
Pakistan
September 29, 2007 2:54pm CST
Do you really think the Pakistani star, Shahid Afridi, inspite of poor batting performances in whole tournament, especially in the final, deserved to be the "MAN OF THE T-20 WORLD CUP". OR do u think someone else deserved it??
Share your views????
1 response
@men82in (1268)
• India
30 Sep 07
Do not judge a man with one tournament results or his play. Upto afridi is an all rounder and fine tail end batsman too. My knowledge might be right. The bluntness is the mainthing with him and his team really deseerves. Definitely he deseerves the man of the t20.
@innocent_dr (539)
• Pakistan
30 Sep 07
yes, i agree with you. But dunt u think, UMAR GUL or RP SINGH did more in enabling their teams to be in final and in case of RP SINGH to cause India to win the final?!?!?
@Bhuadi (97)
• India
4 Oct 07
I am not sure what your trying to say by telling man of t-20 wc.If your refering to man of the series in t-20 world cup.I think it was a good decision to give man of the series award to Shahid.Afridi.He is one of the best batsman of recent times and one of the main reason i watch Inida Pakistan matches is beacuase of Shadid.Afridi.
