Democracy

Pakistan
October 6, 2007 5:00pm CST
What is definition of Democracy. The system of Government which works "for the people, of the people and by the People? " or "far the people, off the people and buy the people?" here in my country, the second definition is being used. Which definition is being used in your country?
1 response
• United States
7 Oct 07
In the great words of Thomas Jefferson, "A democracy is nothing more than mob rule where 51% of the people may take away the rights of the other 49." I like in America where many people have mistakenly led to believe that our country is supposed to be a democracy. It isn't. Our nation was founded as a constitutional republic with a democratic electoral system. Unfortunately our electoral system has drifted far away from democracy as well. It is near impossible to get on the ballot here if you are not in one of the two major parties despite that fact that the majority of our population does not fully agree with either major party. It is such a shame.
@Qaeyious (2357)
• United States
8 Oct 07
I have been supporting third party candidates since 1984. 2004 was an exception when I voted for Kerry in an effort to kick a person out of office - little good that did ... I was with the Natural Law Party until it stopped participating in national races and morphed into something different. I almost went with the Peace and Freedom Party until I read their platform - a bit too socialist for my taste. I am thinking of going back to Libertarian. So if Ron Paul gets the Republican nomination, I might vote (shudder) republican. Are you in a rural area? Everyplace I have lived listed many third party candidates. If you live in a remote area you can always write in a candidate name.
• United States
11 Oct 07
I'm glad to see another person who has voted for many third party candidates! If more people voted on pricincple rather than party, we would have probably had very different people in office over the years. I'm pretty sure Bush would have never been elected either. I'm not in a rural area. I live on the coast of VA in a highly populated area. In my entire state it takes 10,000 signatures to get on the ballot. 400 from each district. Each signature must come from a person who is registered to vote in that district. There are a whole list of requirements and restrictions that make the process daunting to put it mildly. I am part of a meetup group (www.ronpaul.meetup.com) with almost 200 members. We are working on getting petitions signed right now so that we can get Ron Paul on the ballot. We have ran into Guiliani and Hillary people getting signatures as well but they were all paid workers from a firm. They get paid per vote and don't even care for either candidate. Can you imagine a third party candidate able to raise enough money to pay for that many signatures over all 50 states? We are doing what we can so that Ron Paul does not have to pay for it to be done. We care that much. After much hard work, I think we will be able to cover our area but it won't be possible for us to reach all the rural areas that cover other districts in our state. The official campaign is going to have to pay for that. Ron Paul (and often many other third party candidates) does not pander to lobbyists so he doesn't get that corporate money that other candidates like Hillary and Giuliani enjoy so it is a whole different ball game.
• United States
11 Oct 07
Writing candidates in is always an option but the vote will not be counted unless the candidate files a declaration of intent after failing to get on the ballot. Regardless, no candidate has ever won as a write in for a major election. Getting your name on the ballot is crucial.