Unwanted Pets: Should Euthansia Be The Answer?

@pyewacket (43903)
United States
October 7, 2007 6:47pm CST
Okay I'm probably opening a can of worms here..but then that's me...I was just thinking of how many unwanted pets there are that are overcrowding the shelters, and since I am in contact with a good number of pet rescuers, don't ask how many have said to me, that if you think a no-kill animals shelter is no-kill think again. They have told me that they often have to put down unwanted pets to make room for the ever-growing pets that are continued being dumped on them. Many of the unwanted pets are pets that people will adopt, but for some reason can no longer keep. Usually the worse crime and excuse many people have is that they adopt a cute and cuddly kitten or dog, but once it grows up they no longer want it...thus they take it to a shelter and dump yet another unwanted pet on the already overflowing and crammed shelter only adding to the burden. Or...worse yet, not wanting the pet, they simply dump it out on the streets and have it fend for itself, which in all likely hood that pet will die as it just isn't used to fending for itself in the outside world after so much time of having a home. So I got to thinking...and here's is where I might get a lot of flack from...but this is my opinion, mind you, of which I think I have the right to express. If the former pet owner has any decency at all, rather than dumping yet another unwanted pet to an overcrowded shelter, where it may be eventually put down anyway, or dumping it out on the streets, or if taken to a shelter that pet might even risk being adopted by a person who might turn around and sell it to a lab...and hey, folks, many people do this as a person can get up to $300 for selling a pet to a lab---wouldn't it be better if the pet owner, who no longer wants the pet, euthanize it? I hope you understand my rationale in thinking along this way...there are just too many unwanted pets out there, and since I know some of you here are pet rescuers can verify, the enormous amount of unwanted pets yourself, you no doubt understand where I'm coming from in my thinking this way. Oh..I already feel the heat here...so let it begin...LOL
14 people like this
20 responses
• United States
8 Oct 07
I understand what you're saying about this whole thing, but I am going to have to disagree. I just hate the idea of a perfectly healthy, good animal being killed because of the selfishness of people. I just wish that more animal rescues would open up so there was room. And if there were more rescues/sanctuaries than people could leave their pets there without worrying about what will happen to them. I know that's wishful thinking, but I just hate any other alternative for pets. Maybe when I'm rich I can start my own chain of animal rescues :)
4 people like this
• United States
8 Oct 07
That is terrible! She dumped the cats! We have 7 cats and we would never do anything like that to our pets. We love them a lot, and are devoted to them! I understand it is hard to keep up a shelter financially. I meant that I wish we could get more shelters up. Like the government could help pay for them, along with more people willing to donate money to them. I know that people who could afford to donate don't, and I just wish people like that would.
3 people like this
@pyewacket (43903)
• United States
8 Oct 07
I wish more people thought the way you do, and keep their pets no matter what..you really do sound devoted to animals..so my hat is tipped to you--just wish more thought like you do!!
• United States
8 Oct 07
Thank you :) I wish more people did too X.X Maybe people (by some miracle) will start getting smarter and less selfish when it comes to homeless animals.
1 person likes this
@worldwise1 (14885)
• United States
8 Oct 07
It has always confounded me, pyewacket, how a person or family can take in a pet and make it a part of the family, grow to love it and be loved in return, then end up forsaking it for whatever reason. I have seen this happen time and time again. That is why the decision to have a pet should be made only after it has been given a great deal of thought. I think the people who abandon their pets should be punished by the law-if only having to pay a stiff fine. The money could go toward the care of animals in shelters. I don't know if what you suggest would solve the problem, but I do know that pet overpopulation is a serious problem.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
8 Oct 07
How could anyone ever do that? Whenever I think of all the dogs and cats I've been honored with having had through my lifetime my eyes still fill with tears for the ones that have passed on, in most cases after very long, happy and pampered lives. I also find trusting animals easier than trusting some people because they do always give their love unconditionally and they trust their owners - or their staffs, in the case of cats - with their lives. How can anyone let someone down who has place their very life in your hands? What do these people think, who decide they no longer want a pet and just drop it off or take it to a shelter, do they just stop loving it because it's no longer a playful puppy or kitten or because they've grown "bored" and have moved on to something else to entertain them? That just sickens and infuriates me! Pye, your story of the person who got rid of all those cats makes me as burning mad as it does you, and I didn't even see the discussion! That horrible and heartless. I agree that people who abandon their pets should be fined or some kind of penalty should be given; the hard part about that is catching them since many do it in the dark of night, sometimes on a deserted road like where my Sissy was found or they just move away and let their pregnant cat behind like the owners of my Squirt's mommy did! I can at least feel good about saying I personally have two rescued cats and my daughter has three rescues plus some of their offspring giving her a total of eight cats, not counting three kittens that are still nursing. Her adult male cats are now all sterilized and arrangements have already been made for the youngest boy for hopefully before he reaches puberty. The females will all be spayed as well but since they're all inside cats the males need to be done first if you know what I mean. I know it costs too much to run a shelter without a ton of help but maybe if we keep having discussions about these issues we'll at least open some people's eyes to the need for donations, no matter how small, and for people to maybe try to get more programs like Pa.Pets started in other states and countries. Annie
1 person likes this
@Sissygrl (10912)
• Canada
29 Apr 09
I am really on the fence about this one.. but i am glad to say.. that i am doing my part.. and i'm not taking any pets into my home that i know i cannot care for. and when/if i do decide to get a pet. i'm sure it will be a nice cat that i will get from the shelter.. I really almost cried when i was reading this discussion because i know you are right.. but still it seems so wrong.. animals are here because of us, but some of us are so cruel to them.. its really sad..
2 people like this
@Sissygrl (10912)
• Canada
30 Apr 09
I just dont understand how people dont knnow in their minds what they are doing is wrong.. and maybe they do and they just dont care.. i think those puppy/kitten mill owners should have the same thing done to them.. or maybe put them in cages with the those (insert explicits) who exploit and molest children.. I dont care animal or person its a human being and if you have no regard or respect for it, then i have no regard or respect for you, and you should be placed somewhere where the rest of society doesn't have to suffer for your idiotic and inhumain behavoir. OHkay. thats all my ranting done for teh day. thanks !!!
1 person likes this
@pyewacket (43903)
• United States
29 Apr 09
I know the whole idea does seem wrong, but unfortunately there are just too many unwanted pets in shelters. Then of course are the puppy/kitten mills that breed pets for pet stores and are out of control.
2 people like this
• United States
8 Oct 07
Here is my dilemma. I am a 56 year old disabled woman with 8 cats. I have been living in my curent home for almost 15 years. I live in an apartment that is in the back of an old house. The main house is empty. My landlords are an elderly couple. My rent is dirt cheap & includes partial utilities. My landlords due to health reasons are going to sell the house. I am currently looking for a new place to live. I don't have a date that I need to move yet. However because of my income I will need to go into subsidized rent housing. The ones that I have looked at thus far will only allow 1 or 2 cats. I'm still hoping to find one that will allow 3. Though that is highly doubtful. All of my cats are senior citzens. There ages range between 18 & 13 years of age. The oldests wll be 19 in early February. Some of them have minor health problems & are on daily meds. All of my friends have mutiple cat households & are unable to take any of them. I have had six of the cats since they were small kittens. Two I have had since right around the age of two. The only options I see right now is to hopefully find a long term no kill shelter or have them put to sleep myself. I am really concered about how cats this age will deal with all of this.
2 people like this
@pyewacket (43903)
• United States
8 Oct 07
I really feel for you Gaia! It is a dilemma there. I'm only allowed two cats myself, anymore and I could face eviction myself..Like you I'm on disability, am 51 years old. My rent is dirt cheap too, since my grandmohter, mother (both now deceased) and I have lived here since 1961...my rent like I said is really low, probably the lowest in the apartment building--I did have more cats..actually a lot more cats as my mother created a bit of a problem...I was very lucky that I found wonderful pet rescuers upstate NY that took the cats in...like you many were older...they are considered "lifers" there as the chance of them being adopted is zilch...Older animals are a lot harder to place at shelters...One of the shelters the "famous" North Shore Animal league told it to me like this...they have a really hard time even adopting out cats/dogs at two years of age...everyone wants cute kittens/puppies...when the woman, Joanne asked how old my cats were and I said in the 8 year and up range, she all but hung up the phone on me--Like I said, I was really lucky to find places for my cats, but it took a LOT of work to do so The only thing I can suggest and you want to try to find shelters..go to either petfinder.com or pet-ark.com...they should have listings of ALL shelters available in your state...However, none take in pets for free either--there's usually a fee involved...If you have an Animal Care and Control shelter...do not..repeat DO NOT take them there..they are a kill shelter...there are also Yahoo groups...many pet rescue groups that you could join...many are nation wide groups and they might be able to help you too--just trying to give you all the possibilities here Thing is, you need to start looking NOW--you said you have no idea when the landlords are going to sell the house..so you need to do some planning now and not at the last minute..It does take time! Believe me I know! If you need any help with this let me know..I might be able to give you some other leads of what to do
1 person likes this
@CatsandDogs (13963)
• United States
8 Oct 07
Hey GaiaFireLynx being that your cats are so far up in age, they're not going to live much longer obviously, so they most likely don't move around much, right? So who's going to know you have three cats in your "new" apartment unless you tell them? Don't tell them and when you move, if you can, put two in one carrier and one in the other so no one will know. It's a suggestion in hopes to save you from having to separate you and the cats which are your babies. I'd hate to see that happen especially at their ages. That would be really tramatizing to them.
1 person likes this
• United States
8 Oct 07
I actually have 8 cats! I would love to be able to sneak all of them in. However I don't think that's an option. I don't even think I could sneak one in. One of the places I looked at gave me a print out of their pet policy. It is several pages long. I am still trying to interpt it.
2 people like this
@kevere26 (223)
• United States
8 Oct 07
In my world the pet owners should be put to sleep. Since when are we superior to domesticated animals that arrived long before we were even a thought!
2 people like this
@pyewacket (43903)
• United States
8 Oct 07
Then I suppose you think I should be euthanized?? I've had pets since I was five years old..I'm now 51--I have loved and taken care of each and every pet I've had...There are a lot of us pet owners who ARE responsible. And you're getting your terms wrong.. domesticated animals only became domesticated due to mankind
@pyewacket (43903)
• United States
8 Oct 07
As a by the way...the list of "domesticated" animals isn't just cats and dogs, but horses, sheep, goats, pigs, cattle, oxen, llamas, just to name a few. And what do you mean in my world anyway? I'm in America and of this world too just as you...or are you from another planet??
• United States
9 Oct 07
What kind of comment, is that supposed to be? Do you think pet owners should be put to sleep, just because they own pets, or because they do wrong with them? Your comment doesn't make any sense.
1 person likes this
• Singapore
8 Oct 07
Euthanasia should not be the solution. It is a life that we are talking about. Nevertheless, I think many governments and policy-makers have simplified the problem by referring to Euthanasia as the solution. There should be greater responsiblities to be added on during the over-the-counter purchasing of pets. There and then should rules be meted out and registration of pet-owners to hold them to court if they abuse the pet.
2 people like this
@pyewacket (43903)
• United States
8 Oct 07
I don't like the idea of euthanasia of pets in general if they are healthy either...but you have to understand I KNOW a lot of rescuers who HAVE to put animals down cause there are just too many...Let me give you a ball park figure here...I was told that for every single pet, in every single shelter to be adopted, every single person in America would have to adopt a minimum of nine pets...I don't think you're average person is willing to do that..do you?
• Singapore
9 Oct 07
If there is more active restrictions on the point of purchase, there would not be such problems. The failure to stop the problem at its roots will see a constant influx of strays and abandoned. I strongly believe that Euthanasia should only be used to terminate the lives of severely illed pets, not to destroy them because they are too many. That's inhumane
• United States
8 Oct 07
In my opinion instead of owners dumping their unwanted pets into a shelter, I think they should take the time to find a home for it themselves. They made a commitment to the animal, so they should be responsible for finding another home for it, if in fact it has become impossible for them to take care of the animal. Though it has always been my opinion that if a person takes on the animal as a pet, they should be absolutely sure they are ready to take on what could be a life long commitment. Geez that would be sad if we treated humans in the same manner. Oh he/she was cute as a baby, but we no longer can afford him/her, we must dispose of this creature. Anywho, I think euthanasia should only be held as a last resort if the person cannot find a decent home for the animal, if it turns out that everything has been done, than in some cases it would be better than handing it over to a lab, or a shelter, where it's life would just be down graded anyways.
1 person likes this
@pyewacket (43903)
• United States
8 Oct 07
Sad to say many people do treat their babies the same way as is witness to the fact how many times we hear of stories of women who dump their newborns in the garbage
• United States
8 Oct 07
No don't kill fido or mittens just because they don't have a home.Send them to petting zoos, to old folks homes, have adoption drives.There are good homes for these pets , we just have to find them.
2 people like this
@pyewacket (43903)
• United States
8 Oct 07
As I've mentioned though...I personally KNOW a lot of pet rescuers and people who run animal shelters..I also happen to belong to a lot of Yahoo pet rescue groups...you haven't the slightest clue of how overwhelmingly crowded shelters are...There aren't enough homes for all these pets..not unless everyone is willing to take a minimum of nine pets..Believe me I do know what I'm talking about since as I've said I know what the situation is like My one pet rescuer friend is getting panicky cause she says she needs to raise money just to provide for the pets she has...She says her money will run out completely in about three years...it takes an average $1,000 just to buy enough food for them...And do you know how many shelters have to go out of business due to lack of funds? And you can bet those animals are put down..there is just no place to put them all
8 Oct 07
I have to say, Pye, that I despise those people who dump their pets. In the UK our animal rescue charities are over-stretched and under-funded, they can barely survive without massive injections of cash donated by the general public. Places in animal shelters are limited and the problem is only exascerbated by irresponsible owners failing to neuter there pets. I get so angry when I hear of animals being cruelly treated and dumped, and wish I had the kind of money where I could build and maintain a chain of animal rescue centres.
1 person likes this
@pyewacket (43903)
• United States
9 Oct 07
I'm so sorry to hear that the overpopulation of unwanted pets is just as bad where you are...I thought this was just an American thing, but I guess it's worldwide, right? I think a lot of us who love animals would love to open chains of rescue centers. One of the best system we have here is Best Friends in Utah..they actually will accept animals worldwide and aren't limited to cats and dogs but just about every animal imaginable--sure wish there were more places like that
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
8 Oct 07
Yep, you are opening a big can of worms here (now, there's an animal I don't care to safe...lol) but this is myLot so let it open wide! I do see where you're coming from, Pye, and you know what? I think saying this right out, hey, if you don't want your pet kill it humanely yourself instead of placing it in danger of a worse fate might serve to open people's eyes to how serious a situation this is. It's heartbreaking to hear and see on the news about poor pets in shelters or, worse still, those who have been abused and/or neglected by their owners and end up fighting for their lives and often losing. One poster to this discussion said about opening a chain of no-kill shelters if they become rich and I'd love to be able to do something like that myself. The most important thing for people to become aware of is that they should get their pets spayed and neutered! There are some programs that offered these services at reduced fees or even free but not nearly enough. My state, Pennsylvania, has Pa. Pets where senior citizens can get their pets sterilized for $10 or $15. I'm sure many people don't know about this program, so anyone reading this from Pa., help me spread the word! To be honest, as much as I love animals I think if I knew of someone who was about to euthanize their dog or cat or if I thought they were going to get rid of it in some other fashion which would guarantee a horrible end for that pet, I'd probably take it in myself or talk someone else into taking it. But, I have to say you are right, much as I can't stand to think of someone feeling the need to get rid of a healthy pet for no good reason, euthanizing it themselves would be the most humane thing to do in many cases. You've started several discussions about pets so I know you share my love of animals. Let's put our heads together and think of anything we can do to try to alleviate this sad problem. Annie
2 people like this
@pyewacket (43903)
• United States
8 Oct 07
I sure wish there were more programs like yours in PA for senior citizens elsewhere, and it would be great if they had programs to for inexpensive spaying/neutering for people with disabilities..two groups of people who could benefit the most by having a companion animal--It's been studied for instance, that people with depression problems often benefit by having a pet cause they have something to care for. Yes, it would be great if each of us who are pet lovers could open our own shelters, but as you'll see in my response to the first replier, its VERY expensive and has to be thoughtfully planned otherwise no one will benefit, especially the animals involved.
1 person likes this
• Denver, Colorado
8 Oct 07
Here in Denver, Colorado, there is at least one shelter who allow Senior Citizens to adopt a pet already spayed or neutered for FREE. It is a great program and allows lonely senior to have a friend. So many seniors on fixed income can't afford adoption fees or alteration fees. They also provide FREE shots for those who are seniors for the life of the pet if they come from the that shelter. They placed many of the pets that came from Katrina, but they also have many who have become shelter pets because they just aren't adopted and have problems to complicated for adoption. The really great part about this program, it helps reduce the overcrowded facility. It seems to me, if the cost of spaying or neutering, or shots is the issue that keeps people from taking an animal into their lives, than providing a FREE service might be the answer when the dollars to do all that is the question. I know the cost of shots, spay and neuter can be over $200 for many animal shelters, and out here in the public where vets like to make money, even more costly. I just think more programs that offer less expensive ways to give the animal protection would encourage people to keep a pet. I've had to search our city to find a vet that doesn't cost an arm and leg, and these insurance policies on pets can be just as costly for the individual. I don't think Pets for Wealthy only is the answer to the problem.
@brendakaya (2332)
• United States
8 Oct 07
As sad as it makes me to admit this, I agree with you. If the person can't find a good home for their pet, been they might as well put it down. There are just way too many out there suffering, and I hate to see more added everyday. If I could, I would take in every stray in the world, but I'll never be that rich, and even if I were, there is still no possible way, that I could find them all. I do what I can though it's only a drop in the bucket, to what I'd like to do. This world is so full of sadness, and it makes me sad.
2 people like this
@pyewacket (43903)
• United States
8 Oct 07
I'm glad you answered this as I know you're a rescuer yourself and I don't envy the hard job that it is--since I do know other rescuers I know how expensive it is to probably take care of pets...not only the food costs involved but the vet bills as well--my one pet rescuer said it averages about $1,000 per month for her...yeesh!!..She's the one who asked me to design those flyers for her up-coming fundraiser to raise money for her rescue place.
2 people like this
• United States
8 Oct 07
Yes, it is very expensive, but it is worth every penny to me. I only wish that I were able to do more. I love each and every animal out there, and would love to be able to give them all homes.
2 people like this
@cotruelove (1016)
• Denver, Colorado
8 Oct 07
One of the cities in our area has a program I think is marvelous. They have a lot of feral cats in the area and lots of open space and rodents for cats to eat. Rather than euthanize they are picking up the cats spaying or neutering them, microchipping them for easy recognition, and then taking them back to were they found them and turning them loose. If the feral cat has kittens, that gives them the opportunity to rescue and civilize the kittens before the kittens become more feral cats. It helps with the control of the rodent population, eliminates killing the feral cat, keeps track of the cat if it becomes a problem by using the microchip, gets unhealthy feral cats out of the population and helps control disease, and slows the over population of cats in the area. I'd like to see more programs like this one all over the country. What do you think?
1 person likes this
@pyewacket (43903)
• United States
9 Oct 07
As far as I'm aware there are actually a lot of dedicated pet rescuers who do exactly this all over the country, that is trap the ferals, have them spayed/neutered then release them and usually all out of there own pocket money--yes by trapping them then spaying/neutering them it does solve the problem of more ferals being born.
@kevere26 (223)
• United States
8 Oct 07
It would be a terrible loss if you were euthanized! Like you, I'm 51 and am both responsible for and loving toward the 2 cats that allow me to live with them. My joke about human euthanization was meant for those people who treat animals as if they're not living creatures. I'm also aware of the slew of animals we've domesticated and the many abuses these animals endure. The lack of responsibility toward all domesticated animals gets under my skin! You certainly are the last person I want to offend and send you my apologies.
1 person likes this
@pyewacket (43903)
• United States
8 Oct 07
Thank you there...I have to admit I was puzzled by your response. It's not just animals when you think of it...Look how often we hear of women who just gave birth to their baby, and just throw it in the trash!
@izathewzia (5134)
• Philippines
5 Nov 07
I don't think euthanasia is the best solution for unwanted animals. We can give them away to those who are interested, or to the instituions who take care animals, or perhaps we just let them wander outside for the hope of someone might pick them up and take good care of them. Killing them in the form of euthanasia is not the best way or idea for me.
@pyewacket (43903)
• United States
5 Nov 07
To you that might sound like an ideal situation, but since I know so many pet rescuers and people who own shelters, they are so swamped and overloaded with unwanted pets they have to euthanize pets on a regular basis. Did you read my statistics? For EVERY single pet in a shelter situation, EVERY single person in this country would have to adopt at least NINE pets. Do you think the average person wants nine pets? Don't think so. Would you be willing to adopt nine pets? And as for to "just let them wander outside for the hope of someone might pick them up.." Nope.. Many people might pick them up but sell them to labs to be experimented on and have that animal live a life of pain and torture..do you think that is right? People just don't understand the serious issue of over pet population and sorry to say I don't think you do either--I DO KNOW, I know pet rescuers personally and the grim realities that exist
@rusty2rusty (6763)
• Defiance, Ohio
8 Oct 07
I understand the question you are asking pyewacket. In some sense I can agree with it. But than I think of my Daisy, my angel Bones and other pets I have had in the past that were throw away pets. If their previous owners would of put them down. I never would of had the pleasure of having such joy in my life. I have had my Daisy for three years now. She is Five. I can't imagine my life without her. I don't think that is a good solution. Because then that will teach people that it is okay to kill a pet they no longer want. That is just as bad as them leaving them in the streets to fend for themselves. Right now the USA has so many pets. That pets have become a throw away item. Which is very very sad. I think pet awareness and responsiblity is better a solution. It takes a long time. BUt I think the rewards and pay offs are alot better.
1 person likes this
@feralwoman (2199)
• Australia
8 Oct 07
Good on you mate for expressing your opinion which you certainly have the right to do. This is a toughie for me. I've had to euthanase many of my pets when they have become ill and incurable and have no quality of life. It's such a damn sad thing to do. Although I know I have done it for the best, I still feel guilty. As for people that have pets and expect them to stay cute and cuddly for the rest of their lives - well, are they dumb or what? It breaks my heart to think of all the animals needlessly put to sleep because of someone else's stupidity. It also shocks me that the no kill animal shelters aren't no kill. I know that the shelters do try to save some of the animals, esp dogs, by getting in touch with customs/guide dogs for the blind etc, to see if they would be suitable working dogs. Sadly, this doesn't even scratch the surface of the problem. I'd have to agree though, that perhaps this would be the best thing to do. Perhaps prospective pet owners should take an IQ test first! LOL
1 person likes this
@bonbon664 (3466)
• Canada
8 Oct 07
I can't in good conscience condone euthanizing a healthy animal. I'm really not sure what the alternative is though in some cases. I work in animal rescue, brittany spaniels to be specific, and the most common reason we get them into rescue is that people say "we didn't know they were so hyper", I then ask if they exercise the dog, and they say "they get walked a couple of times a week". Well duh, you (&^%en moron! Animals need more love and attention than a drag around the block every couple of days. They think it's so easy to find homes for these dogs, well, sometimes they come with issues, and it's not so easy. I think we have to educate the public about spaying and neutering, and above all people need to know that animals are about a ten year commitment. They are a lot of work, and if you have any doubts, don't get one. It's simple. It's like everything in this society these days, people aren't willing to take responsibility. There's no accountability. I'm sorry, I'm rambling, but, I guess in a sense I agree with you, if you don't want your animal, euthanize it. Take some responsibility, don't put it on me, or she shelter workers who can't find homes for YOUR dog. "Those" animal owners might think twice if they have to be the ones to put the needle in their veins.
1 person likes this
@pyewacket (43903)
• United States
8 Oct 07
I think the main problem too is that this society in general is becoming a "disposable" one...what we no longer want we toss away like so much garbage..hell, women throw out their newborns in trash! My one pet rescuer friend, and I know quite a lot, does carefully screen people who adopt...she says so many times people are all fired up to adopt a particular dog, but don't have a clue the temperament of the breed-she expects people to fully know the personality of the type of dog they want..if they don't she refuses to give them that particular breed of dog
@Katlady2 (9904)
• United States
8 Oct 07
Do ya have your protective fire gear on? I have mine on, cuz I agree with you all the way hon. I know that people think that testing on animals is so necessary and all that, but I think that it's purely inhumane torture. You have an awesome way of thinking hon, and you have my support 100%. Now break out the fire hoses, cuz I think we're gonna need them! LOL
1 person likes this
@pyewacket (43903)
• United States
8 Oct 07
Yup--my fire gear is on and my fire hoses...LOL
@pilbara (1436)
• Australia
8 Oct 07
My first response is no way as I feel that if someone decides to have a pet they should not just dump it when it becomes inconvenient. That being said I understand where you are coming from. I would prefer a third option which is paying for it to be kept for a certain period of time by an animal welfare organisation, and then if no-one else has taken it in then go ahead. All 3 of our pets come from the lost dogs home (despite the fact that 2 are cats) and if someone had merely had these animals euthanised or dumped them we wouldn't have our 3 wonderful pets.
1 person likes this
@pyewacket (43903)
• United States
8 Oct 07
I would wonder though if a person would be willing to pay for a pets' lodging at an animal organization though...boarding pets can be very expensive too, unfortunately a lot more expensive than putting it down...I'm not sure of the exact expense but it might be about $25 a day on average...I'm so glad to hear though that you got your 3 pets and saved them...that's three less that are unwanted but now are instead loved and taken care of
@CatsandDogs (13963)
• United States
8 Oct 07
It is a sad case no matter how you look at it but you are right. As much as I HATE it, you're right. Giving a pet up to the shelter where it'll be tramatized dramatically is inhumane as hell. It would be better off to be put down rather than going through the adjustment of the shelter then if it gets adopted adjustment to the new home and new family and their ways. But I've got to tell you though, it really pi$$es me off when anyone gives up a pet for they're for the life of the pet, NOT for the convience of the person. I will die for my babies and yes I said babies because that's what they are to me. They're a part of this family as they should be with any family. I will do anything to be sure they're fed and I mean anything if need be. They didn't ask for you to take them in but you did so take the responsibility seriously for it is a serious and important job. Besides, they give us more than what we give them. They give so much in return.
1 person likes this
@pyewacket (43903)
• United States
8 Oct 07
I see my two cats as my babies too and I love them like they were my children..and needless to say they are spoiled rotten..but who cares?