Keeping private what should be kept private!
By GaiaFireLynx
@GaiaFireLynx (208)
United States
5 responses
@Gargoyle0134 (1257)
• United States
7 May 08
You know..they don't have anything I can't see in a mirror, so I never looked, actually.
I have heard about that..but it's the tabloids crawling up there to take the photos and make them public. I believe in being covered appropriately? But..I don't worry about it either way. There have alwasy been "loose" girls and always will be. But do we really need close-up photos?
@suspenseful (40193)
• Canada
23 Nov 07
I used to wear mini-skirts when I was in my twenties, but at least I knew how to sit and how to get up and I always wore pantyhose and underwear. Of course, I lived in Vancouver, B.C. and it was never warm enough to go bare legged and when I did it was summer, and then I wore shorts, but those two ladies are showing too much of their underwear and I remember wasn't that a photo of one of them did not even have anything underneath?
@CatsandDogs (13963)
• United States
15 Oct 07
They're young and full of themselves however I don't think they mean to show their *private parts* however it does happen even to the best of us but in their case, they're well known and so the picture taking idiots are there to take that one picture to show to the world. As if they've never done anything wrong themselves. HA!
I say this, if you have it, flaunt it. Just don't show it all. They have it and they're flaunting it. It won't be much longer before all that prettiness wears off for they'll grow older just like the rest of us.
@catskisses (434)
• United States
13 Oct 07
Brittany and Paris HAVE to do that. Otherwise they'd both fade into oblivion. When is the last time you hear about either of them unless they were unclothed or behaving like idiots?