Should we be worried about superbugs?

Canada
October 17, 2007 2:28pm CST
Deaths tied to these "superbug" infections may exceed those caused by AIDS in the near future. Last Tuesdays there was a report that showed just how far one form of the staph germ has spread beyond its traditional hospital setting. The overall incidence rate was about 32 invasive infections per 100,000 people. Which is relatively high compared to other infections. Most drug-resistant staph cases are mild skin infections. But this study focused on invasive infections — those that enter the bloodstream or destroy flesh and can turn deadly. Researchers found that only about one-quarter involved hospitalized patients. However, more than half were in the health care system — people who had recently had surgery or were on kidney dialysis, for example. Open wounds and exposure to medical equipment are major ways the bug spreads. In recent years, the resistant germ has become more common in hospitals and it has been spreading through prisons, gyms and locker rooms, and in poor urban neighborhoods. The new study offers the broadest look yet at the pervasiveness of the most severe infections caused by the bug, called methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA. These bacteria can be carried by healthy people, living on their skin or in their noses. An invasive form of the disease is being blamed for the death of a 17-year-old Virginia high school senior. Doctors said the germ had spread to his kidneys, liver, lungs and muscles around his heart. The results underscore the need for better prevention measures. That includes curbing the overuse of antibiotics and improving hand-washing and other hygiene procedures among hospital workers. Some hospitals have drastically cut infections by first isolating new patients until they are screened for MRSA. The bacteria don't respond to penicillin-related antibiotics once commonly used to treat them, partly because of overuse.
3 people like this
6 responses
@Tampa_girl7 (50270)
• United States
8 Jul 20
And the Corona Virus is here now
1 person likes this
@rebelann (112878)
• El Paso, Texas
8 Jul 20
I just pray it won't be as bad as the Spanish Flu was in 1918
@GardenGerty (160703)
• United States
7 Jul 20
We should take all the precautions we can to avoid them, but not worry as such, because that lowers our immunity.
1 person likes this
@rebelann (112878)
• El Paso, Texas
8 Jul 20
I think the face masks during flu season would be especially helpful.
@speakeasy (4171)
• United States
18 Oct 07
Should we worry about "superbugs"? Well, should we worry about drought, cancer, hurricanes, car accidents, strokes, killer bees, etc.? If you allow yourself to worry about every little thing that "could" happen; your life would be miserable. That doesn't mean you should ignore these things; just don't let worrying about them rule your life. Take common sense steps to protect yourself and stop worrying - worry creates stress and stress kills.
• United States
18 Oct 07
i agree with u 100%.
@RosieS57 (889)
• United States
17 Oct 07
Most healthy people don't need to worry. Many healthy people already carry the staph bacilli. It is people who have compromised immune systems that must worry. I am one and I do. I am very careful to never let any infection develop so that it won't roar out of control. I also have limited my exposure to strangers and new places so as to not pick up the bug. The severe arthritis I have will kill me if left untreated. If I'm not cautious enough, any infection I get could kill me, as it has 7 of my arthritic friends already.
@laylomo (165)
• United States
18 Oct 07
I think the most important thing for the international medical community is to discover a "new" penicillin. Although penicillin works well with many diseases, our rampant overuse, as you've said, is the cause of all these problems. Hopefully, alternative medicines will be successful in the future. The report you cited, however, reminds me of child abductions, rapes, and other horrid crimes. The reason is the media today often reports issues that have occured in the past, scaring the public into believing that the world is more chaotic, evil, destructive than ever before. Take for example child abductions. Children abductions started showing up in the media, especially in California only recently (such as Amber Alert, etc.) while the rate of child abduction pretty much remained the same. So back on the subject: this "resistant germ" is nothing new. There are instances in the past where diseases were incurable and unidentifiable, small cases (most severe outbreaks got reported). Sure, it's great we realize that certain diseases are an issue, but it's not justification for public panic. I have this feeling that somewhere out there, a group of people are doing everything within their means to protect themselves from these "superbugs". So we shouldn't worry!
• United States
18 Oct 07
No really we shouldnt. I say this as a medical student and a future doc in training, as well as someone with a background in infectious disease and public health. Its unfortunate what happened to the rare few but the incidence is extremely low compared to the rest of the population. Its mostly contracted in the hospital anyway, and the recent infections are pretty random and the media helps spread the confusion.