shane warne or murali?
@mandeep_narang (108)
India
December 4, 2007 11:41pm CST
even though i am in the sub-continent still i would rate warne as the best all time bowler...this is because he has taken most of his wickets in aust and eng where the pitches do not favour the spinners but have fast tracks but murali has played most of it in ind,pak and sri lanka....
3 responses
@vaibhavsawke (820)
• India
5 Dec 07
i don't rate any of them as a great player. because in a gentleman's game like cricket to be great means maintaining
dignity both on and off field.But as we know that both shane and murli don't have the greatest reputation off field....so for me they could be highest wicket takers but they are certainly not great players
@kshy_ptl (5)
• Norway
5 Dec 07
Murali is best because he took 710 wickets in 116 test while warne played 145 test to get 708 wickets
