Waiting 2 months and trying again?

United States
December 31, 2007 8:14pm CST
Am I the only one that remembers my doctor telling me to wait at least 9 months before trying for another baby? What's the deal with women waiting a few months and trying again? So many of the women in communities I'm a member again are already trying and at least 5 in one community are already pregnant. Seriously. Their due dates are mere days away from their new babies' birthdays. Don't you want to enjoy your baby before popping out another one? I can understand fertility issues where children have to happen NOW but this doesn't seem to be the case. What's the deal?
6 people like this
11 responses
@nicolecab (923)
• United States
1 Jan 08
I have asked my self this question numbers of times. My son is 10 months and I have some one asking me every day so when are you haveing another one. I really do want to enjoy the time that I have with just me and my son since I am a stay at home mom I get him all day to myself untill daddy comes home. They grow up to fast to have to start all over again and have a new born before your baby is even one you miss out on so much.
1 person likes this
• United States
1 Jan 08
See, that's how I think. I'm afraid of missing something! How can you enjoy all those cute firsts if you're dealing with pregnancy or another child. Especially with this being my first, I want to enjoy my time with her.
2 people like this
@kimiyu (47)
• China
1 Jan 08
Yes,My wife and I also think so ,We would like to give all our love to our daughter.you know ,kid is so lovely.
1 person likes this
@lecanis (16647)
• Murfreesboro, Tennessee
1 Jan 08
I think that part of it is social pressure, to be honest. I get asked every day by someone or other when I'm having a baby brother or sister for my son, and I've been asked that since he was just a couple months old. In my case, I don't much care what people think of me, so it didn't affect me much. However, I try to put myself into the shoes of some of the people I know, and see how their lives are different from mine. If I were one of those people who was really close to their family, and were being asked this question by my parents all the time, it might affect me. If I were someone who was part of a religion that encouraged having as many children as possible (like one of the Christian denominations we have in our area), then that might affect me. If I were being pressured by my partner to have more kids because "that's a woman's job", it might also affect me. None of those are the case for me. My husband and I have already decided we are only having one child, and no one is really in a position to influence me on that. However, I know a lot of women who are influenced by others, even on serious decisions like having a child.
@lecanis (16647)
• Murfreesboro, Tennessee
1 Jan 08
I wouldn't, personally. :P However, I know many people, especially older people, who still have that mindset of "People should have as many kids as they can, and have them young." I don't know why, honestly, but I know most of the people who pressure me about having more kids are older, or have lots of kids themselves and think it's the only way to be happy... so of course they want me to do it again as soon as I can so I have plenty of good childbearing years before me. *rolls her eyes*
@sacmom (14192)
• United States
1 Jan 08
"My husband and I have already decided we are only having one child, and no one is really in a position to influence me on that." Oh I remember those days! My husband and I were exactly like that when I had our first son. Even while I was pregnant with him I told a lot of family members this would be our only baby. Of course, this made them hound me more LOL, but I am not one to be pressured into anything. I had even signed the tubal ligation form months in advance as I wanted to be fixed right after I gave birth. But my husband was the one that changed my mind on getting the tubal, and none too soon. After our first son was born we had a very serious talk in the hospital room. I was not swayed by even him until he asked me how I would feel if heaven forbid, our baby was to die? Would I want another? I honestly didn't know the answer to that so we decided to hold off on me getting my tubes tied. 3 years later I gave birth to my second son. I'm so glad I had him (after all) as he, along with his brother are my whole life. :) Don't worry lecanis, I'm not trying to change your mind on having another. I'm not like that...except to those that had it coming. heehee
1 person likes this
• United States
1 Jan 08
Why would you pressure someone into another child or expect them to just months after having one? Does that mean that the child wasn't good enough for you? My MIL wants another grandbaby but only because she wants a boy. She in no way expect me to have another anytime soon.
1 person likes this
@Debs_place (10520)
• United States
1 Jan 08
My hubby's kids are about 18 months apart and they are very close, they share and apartment and have hung together all of their lives, they have played on the same hockey teams and were only a grade apart in school. My brothers are older then me or younger then me by 3 years, we are not close at all, my sister is 13 years younger then I. I think if we were closer in age, we would be closer as adult siblings.
• United States
2 Jan 08
I do suppose it's a choice, and 18 months apart really doesn't sound too terribly close, but 11 and twelve months apart does. There are so many issues including milk possibly drying up due to a new pregnancy, not being able to spend as much quality time with your baby - it just seems so close.
@kellys3ps (3723)
• United States
2 Jan 08
I don't know many mothers who try to get pregnant again so soon, most of the people I know with kids that close together were "accidents" so to speak. My doctor never really gave me a date to try for the next baby. With the first baby the doctor told me to stop taking birth control for at least 6 months before having the next baby (he said it would take that long to get out of my system). WRONG! It only took 1 day!
• United States
2 Jan 08
Accidents I get, but these women are already trying - that's the part that confuses me. Why? Why not spend some time with the child you just had before planning another one?
@youless (112586)
• Guangzhou, China
1 Jan 08
In my opinion, I think it's better to have another baby after one or two years later. Bringing up two babies are so difficult and tiring. And your body also needs time to prepare for the next pregnancy. A few months seem to be in a hurry.
• United States
1 Jan 08
It does seem to be a hurry, doesn't it.
@asgtswife04 (2475)
• United States
1 Jan 08
I definitely think that you should wait a while before trying to have another baby after just having one. You need to have time to spend with the first one and to bond with him before, as you say, pop out another one. There needs to be that special connection between mother and child before you have to start all over again. With my second son, my oldest son was only 10 months old, but the second one wasn't planned either...just happened and i was on birth control. It really put a damper on my and my son's relationship because I was having to deal with another infant before he even understood what it meant to have another baby in the house when he was still a baby himself. I really think it's a bad idea to have children that close together. I think waiting until the child is at least two is a lot better and the children will be a lot closer. My two boys now fight constantly, always competing for my attention. It's absolutely crazy. God bless
• United States
2 Jan 08
Oh Yeah, there is tons of competition. I know they are boys and are gonna compete at times anyways, but sometimes it's over things so stupid and they get so jealous of who is around me at the time and then it turns into one big fight and then they spend the rest of the day seeing which one can get the other one in the most trouble. Although I used to think that them being so close in age would keep them closer together, due to at one point they were close, as they get older I see that it seems to be tearing them apart more than helping. God bless
• United States
1 Jan 08
That's something I didn't even think about, the competition that could occur when having children so close together.
@academic2 (7000)
• Uganda
1 Jan 08
Doctors enjoy professional authority, that is why when they talk, we who are lay men just act-they wield so much authority that we risk following their instructions blindly-am sure they have alot of consideration when they tell you such, and these could be considerstions resulting from serious investigations conducted on you! Just follow what they say, if you had a personal oppinion, consult another Doctor, and he would tell you why your Doctor is saying what he is saying!
• United States
1 Jan 08
? I fully understand why doctors say to wait 9 months or longer. What I don't understand is why so many choose not to listen.
• United States
1 Jan 08
my older kids in 2003 - A picture of my oldest 3 kids on January 3, 2003.
Meagan-2 1/2, Brenna-almost 2 months old and Owen-15 months.
Because having babies close together is a lot of fun, and I'm not trying to be sarcastic. My first 3 kids were born in a 28 month span (June 2000, October 2001 and November 2002). My oldest was 6 months old when I got pregnant with #2 and he was 4 months old when I got pregnant with #3. I love it. All mine were c-sections, too, so that wore me out but I still wouldn't change it for anything. Of course, they weren't planned that way. #2 and #3 were both accidents (because of BC screw ups) and anniversary presents. Our wedding anniversary is January 7th (next week marks 8 years for us). Our son was born almost 9 months to the day from our 1st anniversary. #3 was born 9 months after we finally got to celebrate anniversary #2 (in February of that year). We kind of quit celebrating after that, lol. I can't imagine if we had waited. Our last baby was born in 2006. She is almost 6 years, 4 1/2 years and 3 1/2 years younger then her other siblings and, honestly, I hated it. I hated having to move back into baby mode, whereas it never phased me when #2 and #3 were born. And it was very surreal when #3 started to get older and there was no new baby in the house. If felt very odd and she was babied way too much. She is 5 now and still talks and acts like a 3 year old half the time. I'm trying not to make the same mistake with my youngest (who is now almost 21 months). After she was born I actually felt very guilty that I couldn't give her a sibling close in age. If my body could have handled it (I had a really rough pregnancy with her and a uterine infection after the surgery) and we had the money I probably would have been pregnant by the time she was 6 months old. In the end I much preferred the 1 year span between kids. I had too hard a time going from preschool aged kids to a new baby in the house. They are kind of all a handful now anyway (more so then when they were toddlers). They are 7 1/2, 6, 5 and almost 21 months.
• United States
1 Jan 08
Well, this isn't a new phenomenon. It has always happened, mostly because there was no birth control. Why do you think they call them Irish twins? Because the Irish Catholics didn't believe in birth control so they just got pregnant whenever. It used to be a derogatory thing, but now it has taken on new meaning. If our bodies couldn't handle back to back pregnancies then it would be impossible for it to happen. I really don't see the big deal. Obviously, since you have never had 2 children close in age you wouldn't understand the fun and joy of having 2 babies in the house. It is a riot. My oldest 2 kids are 15 months apart and the middle 2 are 13 months apart. My 3rd pregnancy was actually my easiest, luckily. I felt great through most of it and I was chasing around a toddler and a very mobile baby/toddler. He started crawling at 5 months and was walking at 10 months. I wouldn't trade it for everything and I just can't imagine why people would WANT to space their kids out more then 3 years. My last one is 3 1/2 year younger then #3 and I absolutely hate it. She has nothing in common with her siblings so she clings to me for attention. The other 3 always had each other to play with and get along pretty good (for the most part). They play with the baby but really she can't do the things they do so they are stuck not doing a lot of stuff because she can't do it, too. Like I said, my first 3 were accidents, but if I had the choice I would have gotten pregnant again right away after #4 just so she could have a sibling her age to play with.
@baileym11 (887)
• United States
1 Jan 08
Well, I say to each his/her own. I would never want to do it that way because I cherish each day with my daughter. She is two now, but we didn't bring her home until 10 months old (she was adopted from Guatemala). If my husband would agree, I would be ready to do it again, but I would have a hard time splitting up my time. So...I don't know. If people think they are ready again, I guess they should go for it.
• United States
1 Jan 08
I guess I just don't understand how people could feel that they're ready again. Medical issues aside, what's wrong with the first baby that you don't want to spend as much time with him/her as possible before moving on to a new one?
@eden32 (3973)
• United States
1 Jan 08
Personally I have waited years between each of my children, and for my family that worked out perfectly. But for other families there could be plenty of legit reasons why they wish for their children to be closer in age. If mom is planning on taking a few years off from work, but then wants to resume her career then having them back to back may make sense for her. Or if the family knows that in X number of years they want to change careers & they'll no longer have health insurance. Or even just wanting the children to be close enough in age to be playmates. I think it's a personal decision & whatever works for your family is what's right for you.
• United States
1 Jan 08
But if you're going to lose health insurance, wouldn't it be a scary idea to have more kids?
• United States
1 Jan 08
Well, the main reason as to why doctors tell females to wait so long after they birth a first child is for several reasons- many of which deal with anatomy and biology of the female body. Females, are very complex organisms. They require so many things- and that is not just from a males prespective. You see, when a female concives, and is going through the diffent tri-mesters of the pregency [each tri-mester lasting 3 months], certain things go on in the body. The body, in a way, basically restructures itself. One such restructing is the moving of a lot of the abdominal tissue. Now, have you ever not worked out before, then one random day, you descide to work out. What happens? You become soar. This soarness is caused by the muscle tissue re-healling itself. Now lets take into consideration how large the female is. If her tissue is becoming restructured, and the restructuring last for about 9 months, it will take even longer for them to heal. Even though I do not really agree with the amont of time they are asking for when waiting to have another child, you also have to take into consideration this- a baby is hard work, and it requires a lot of undivided attention. Having another child, right after another child, does not allow for the mother to properly take care of the first child. Also, if the moster is suffering from post-pardom depression, this will make the task even harder. So, in a nutshell, those are the basic reasons why doctors tell females to wait so long after their first pregnancy. I hoped that helped you somewhat =].
• United States
1 Jan 08
So then why are so many women so eager to pop out another baby right away? Why not wait? I'm just utterly surprised that these women are already TRYING and getting pregnant only 2 months after giving birth.