Roger Clemens say it isn't so.

If Clemens did something wrong, he needs to state what it was and that's it. I'm not going to declare him guilty. It's like now if you're an athlete, you are judged as an automatic steroid user. I'm right now just waiting because I couldn't tell you if he did steroids or not. If there's proof that comes out whether it be Clemens admitting it himself or there's documents that can prove that he took them on certain date, then I will comment on that. Until then, I will say he's innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around.

Unfortunately, people are quick to judge and will say he did it without giving him the benefit of the doubt. I am not saying he did it, I am not going to say he didn't do it. I would rather wait until everything comes out in the open to see what Clemens really did. Right now, it's just his word against someone else's. If he did do it, I would be embarassed for him that he went to all these lengths to prove his innocence and essentially just lied to everyone. If he didn't, I think there should be some recourse for someone defaming him. I think it's just going to take time to see what really happened.