"You complete me". Is this so?
@sarahruthbeth22 (43143)
United States
January 15, 2008 4:22pm CST
Although I may not like roses and chocolates and mussy movies, I am romantic. I feel that when you find your soulmate that you become complete. but I have heard over and over that you have to be a whole person to love anyone else. And I always thought if you are already whole, why would you need another person. If nothing is missing , why search for your soulmate?What do you think?
4 people like this
15 responses
@Armstrong7886 (303)
• United States
15 Jan 08
Before I met my fiancee, I thought I was very happy. I thought I had all that I needed. And then when we started talking I realized she is what I needed. I've been with her over a year now and I am so much more happier than I was before I met her so yeah, she did complete me. I also know that if I ever lost her, I would be so lost in this world. I am so glad I found her and I really want to spend the rest of my life with her.
2 people like this
@sarahruthbeth22 (43143)
• United States
16 Jan 08
That is wonderful.I am so happy for you.
1 person likes this
@sojournseeker (1244)
• United States
16 Jan 08
Armstrong7886, even though I come off with a bit of hostility in putting the soulmate and completeness thing in the foreground; but I just am cautious now and love is very precious, very delicate and extraordinarily complicated. The hows and whys are so societally-modified by each culture just loving because we do not for completeness more happiness or extra security in growing old with someone who tolerates us, but so much because of the capacity to share our deeper truer selves with like-people, therefore the soul-mate concept arised and has not let up since.
Best of success cause luck ain't got s--- to do with it, this was mutuality !
sharing the light and happy new year,
Miss Erica Hidvegi, the Enlightenment_Advisor, B.A. Psych/M.A. Transpersonal Studies- Cnslng/Author, Artist, Photographer, Entrepreneur & Freelance extraordinaire
http://www.livejournal.com/users/mindful_walker/
@kevsgirlalways (5883)
• Malaysia
16 Jan 08
well, you probably don’t search for your soulmate..you find each other, when the time is right. And yes, I think as long as you're happy and content with your life, you don't need other people to make you happy and whole, as your happiness depends on you. but we're humans after all, we need to love and be loved ;)
2 people like this
@sarahruthbeth22 (43143)
• United States
16 Jan 08
There are many people who don't look for oe need love in their lives. I agree that you need people to make you happy but you do need them to make you feel whole unless you are whole already. And if you are whole already, why would you need anyone else?
1 person likes this
@gobindsing (470)
• India
16 Jan 08
Right, if you are complete, why would you need somebody else? I think it's like having a great steak dinner, but its the strawberry and cream dessert that 'complete' the meal.
2 people like this
@sarahruthbeth22 (43143)
• United States
16 Jan 08
Exactly. You want and need that dessert and dinner just isn't the same without it.
1 person likes this
@fianne (1057)
• United States
16 Jan 08
well, it depends on how a person look at himself i guess. like priests and nuns, they believe that having relationship in their order is bad because they have given fully their life to God. that Completes them. as for me, yes i have a boyfriend, and he completes me...
2 people like this
@sarahruthbeth22 (43143)
• United States
16 Jan 08
Yes of course. They Need their relationship with G-d to feel complete.
1 person likes this
@sojournseeker (1244)
• United States
16 Jan 08
As a regular person in a relationship and as a therapist looking inside of one through a clients ees, my conclusion is the same: if two people are NOT WHOLE withinin themselves, get whole first before being in a relationship because when you do come together in harmony when one needs reserve energy, affection, compassion, empathy, passion, etc it will come from what you two put in together and not depleting from a person lacking what the other 'seems to provide'. Did that make sense ? I hope so . . .
sharing the light and happy new year,
Miss Erica Hidvegi, the Enlightenment_Advisor, B.A. Psych/M.A. Transpersonal Studies- Cnslng/Author, Artist, Photographer, Entrepreneur & Freelance extraordinaire
2 people like this
@sarahruthbeth22 (43143)
• United States
16 Jan 08
But if you are whole, you Don't need anyone. so why would you out looking for anyone if you have everything you need in yourself?The other person would be just extra and not necessary.And if the person isn't necessary, then they can be disregarded.
1 person likes this
@AICIRT81 (847)
• United States
16 Jan 08
another person is not going to make you whole. You need to be whole first and know who you are and what you want out of life before you can determine who your soulmate is. If you aren't whole, you aren't in touch with your soul. in order to find our soul mate, you need to find your soul first.
@sarahruthbeth22 (43143)
• United States
16 Jan 08
You can know yourself and what you want from a soulmate and what you want from life And feel like something is missing . And when you find that "perfect", I mean perfect for you, someone you are now whole. Why would a " whole" person, a person that has everything they need and want, need any one or anything else?
1 person likes this
@MsTickle (25180)
• Australia
19 Jan 08
What an excellent point you make here. I'd like to elaborate but I honestly can't think of much.
I'm alone and content (alone except for my animals that is) and I truly feel that there is no room for someone in my life but I still wonder and yes, wish that there was someone truly special to share the good bits with. Of course that person would be my soulmate.
@kamran12 (5526)
• Pakistan
15 Jan 08
Hello sararuthbeth22!:-)
Very interesting question indeed!
Well, here's my take on this...
Humans are never a whole 'whole'. I see humans as parts of a whole but as distinct wholes in themselves. It's like two pieces of a puzzle or in engineering terms male and female parts of a machine which are separately a 'whole', yet, when combined they not only complete each other but also make another bigger "whole".
Or perhaps, human body will be a better example. We have different organs, which are distinct working units having their own unique functions and roles. They are 'whole' in themselves in the sense that their job is/can be done by none but them, yet, a bigger whole, a 'complete' human body is formed when they all get together and complete each other in a joint and mutually dependent fashion.
Moreover, in order to enjoy one 'whole', "completely", the other should itself be a 'whole'...like in order to enjoy the full functioning of an arm (one whole) and its best performance, Brain (other whole) should wholly be working, otherwise if right side of brain is damaged, left arm will appear as less functional or even non-functional. So, in my view, it is possible that two are distinct ‘wholes’ yet they may further complete each other to make another bigger whole!
I don't know if it makes sense to you, it didn't make much sense, perhaps, to me either until I was married!:-)
2 people like this
@sarahruthbeth22 (43143)
• United States
16 Jan 08
I think I understand.A whole piece of a puzzle needs another whole piece to fit together to become a bigger piece?The one thing I disagree with is the assumtion that it has to be one female and one male to make this "whole" What if you are gay? You don't have a soulmate? You don't get to become a bigger whole?
1 person likes this
@jillhill (37354)
• United States
16 Jan 08
It's a bonus to find someone who is your soulmate. Yes. You need to love yourself first and be somewhat of a whole person so you can be confident enough to open your heart! And sometimes when you meet that person you grow and become more!
2 people like this
@SixPaulEleven (552)
• United States
15 Jan 08
Complete me as in emotional needs, sure. It's human nature to want or to be loved by someone. When we find a person who pays attention to us, we feel 'complete' because that missing part of our life -- not being loved or appreciated -- has been found.
Complete me as in I can't live without you, not for me. I am just as happy married as I am single. Before I found my DH, I was not looking for romance or love. I was VERY happy being single and had decided after 2 failed engagements (one of which he dumped me 2 weeks before our wedding date then married the sk-ank on our wedding date using OUR flowers that we paid for and used the chapel that WE paid for), I gave up. Screw it. I don't need love. But it found me and I couldn't be happier.
But it does rub me the wrong way when I hear that so and so completed me and I can't live without him. Unless he has you hooked up to a self controled ventilator which is controlling your breathing when he pushes the button on it, you can live without him.
1 person likes this
@sarahruthbeth22 (43143)
• United States
15 Jan 08
I think it is the most romantic thing to hear that a person can't live without you. I do agree that you feel complete when you find or in your case your soulmate finds you.
1 person likes this
@sojournseeker (1244)
• United States
16 Jan 08
After reading this one, it should be picked as best because the latter holds more true than the original statement. "Complete me" in some level of extra happiness, security, better than it was before ok I agree--the "I would be lost or can't live without you or something equally irrational but love-struck none the less, I agree with SixPaul and retract the 'soapbox' bit on wholeness . . . no one seems to want to hear that from us anymore. Maybe thats why I never became licensed in clinical therapy instead just take casual lead in helping people spiritually without textbook instruction and confined misdirection.
sharing the light and happy new year,
Miss Erica Hidvegi, the Enlightenment_Advisor, B.A. Psych/M.A. Transpersonal Studies- Cnslng/Author, Artist, Photographer, Entrepreneur & Freelance extraordinaire
1 person likes this
@VeronicaClarke (84)
•
16 Jan 08
I think that we are all made to be in a pair, we were built to be in a couple. I believe you have to be strong and know yourself before you can love truly though. I dont think that another person completes you necessarily, but if it is the person for you then it makes you feel like you have found your equal!
1 person likes this
@sarahruthbeth22 (43143)
• United States
17 Jan 08
I agree. Two people who know themselves coming together and making a strong pair.
@kara2868 (6)
•
16 Jan 08
I think when you've found the right person after a while when your not with them it does feel as if part of you is missing. I've been with my partner 4 years and cannot imagine not having him there to finish off my sentences for me and visa versa. Its also nice when your just about to say something and the other person already knows what you're thinking
@sarahruthbeth22 (43143)
• United States
17 Jan 08
I would do that to my mom all the time. One of us would say a complete sentence that the other was about to say.
@sumimasen (644)
• United States
15 Jan 08
What I've noticed is that men and women tend to have certain emotional needs in a relationship. It's easy to get carried away by a fascinating new person, but those levels of fascination are different for men than women.
I think most men will chase after a pretty face, while women tend to be drawn towards exciting and confident men.
It seems to me like people are too free-spirited; maybe they say what they want, and need something completely different.
1 person likes this