Is The Iraq War a Determining Factor in the 2008 Presidential Elections?
By mehale
@mehale (2200)
United States
January 21, 2008 4:57pm CST
Most Americans will agree that they are tired of hearing about the war in Iraq, the death tolls, and sending more soldiers in to Iraq. How important is this issue to you in the upcoming presidential election? Would a candidate's stance on this issue be a deciding factor in gaining your vote? Why or why not?
While I agree that the war is dragging on for far too long, I also have to admit that there is no easy answer to this one. I for one would be leary of voting for any candidate that wants to push an immediate withdrawl of our troops. I do not think that reducing the number of troops there would be a problem, but I believe that if we immediately took them all out, we would face serious consequences here at home. What are your thoughts on this issue?
6 responses
@tamararacine (268)
• United States
21 Jan 08
I would love to never have to loose another friend or have to go over there. But in all honesty this is not going to end any time soon. The candidates so far haven't really touched on the subject but I feel they will say what wants to be heard.I personally do not like any of the candidates, so I will have to do some more researching on them. Once election is over all the promises they made go right out the window.
@mehale (2200)
• United States
21 Jan 08
I have to agree totally with you. We work with the military quite a bit, and I have to say that I greatly admire what our soldiers do for us. Just in case no one has said this to you...thank you! I am also having a hard time finding one candidate to stand behind. It is turning into the usuall mud slinging contests and just simply saying what is necessary to gain the vote.
On a serious note, I have to agree that this is one war that will not end any time soon, no matter whom wishes other wise. Be safe.
@tamararacine (268)
• United States
21 Jan 08
You are welcome.
I hate when elections come around because in honesty, how do you believe anything they are saying???
1 person likes this
@meziane67 (37)
• United States
22 Jan 08
I think the war is a very important factor because a lot of people want to hear from the new candiates what they ae going to do about the war. 50% wants to end and the other 50% want continue. So what ever choices the candidates make, they will lose the other voters I guess. The war does take too long and as long as americans are there haters will continue to bomb buildings. We have no good solution for this one because both sides don't want to give up.
@Smith2028 (797)
• United States
25 Jan 08
While it will still play a part in some votes, the Iraq War has largely been played out in the political arena. Realizing now, based on statistics from Baghdad, that the surge is working and that our troops will be there for a while.
Other issues such as the economy and immigration are more prominent than the Iraq war. It is not a deciding factor in my voting as I realize that no matter who is elected our troops will still be there and there isn't anything that a President alone can do. Removing our troops will require congressional action, Iraqi governmental action, and even international action.
@max1950 (2306)
• United States
22 Jan 08
AS A U.S. MARINE I SAY NO !!!! MY OWN THOUGHT WAS WE AS USUAL DIDN'T GO IN STRONG ENOUGH AND IT'S STILL GOING ON,NOW YOU HAVE THESE SENATORS AND SUCH NO-ONE EVER HEARD OF TRYING TO RUN OUR COUNTRY,AND THE ONE'S THAT DESERVE TO GET ELECTED PROBABLY WON'T BECAUSE SOME PEOPLE WILL VOTE FOR THESE UN-KNOWN'S IT'S A JOKE.I THINK MOST PEOPLE WHETHER THEY ADMIT IT OR NOT HAVE AS IN THE VIET-NAM WAR HAVE FORGOTTEN WHY WE WENT OVER BECAUSE IT'S TAKING SO LONG TO GET DONE.LET'S STOP ALL THE B.S. THE REASON WE ARE THERE IS "OIL" PERIOD.DO PEOPLE REALLY THINK WE WOULD LET COUNTRIES LIKE IRAN HAVE NUKES IF IT WASN'T IN SOME WAY IN OUR BENEFIT.AND THE MOST AMAZING THING IS WHOEVER IS PRESIDENT WILL GET NOTHING DONE IF CONGRESS DOESN'T PASS THE BILLS AND WORK THE HOURS THEY SHOULD.ps.we paid 147.63 for a hammer last week or should i say the taxpayers did.
1 person likes this
@mehale (2200)
• United States
22 Jan 08
I agree with you that we did not go in nearly strong enough. I also think that there will be severe consequences if the next president pulls troops out too soon like some of them want to do. I believe that we need to finish what we started there, however, I am not sure that we will ever totally stop the terrorist groups. I also wonder if a democratic government will last in Iraq after our troops have come home. Do you think there is a chance that it will last? Also WHO would you like to see elected? Just curious. And P.S. I DO APPRECIATE WHAT YOU DO FOR US AND OUR COUNTRY. More than you know. Be safe!
@lexus54 (3572)
• Singapore
22 Jan 08
As an outside observer of world events as well as the coming US Presidential elections, I would think that the Iraq War that the US and her UN allies championed in 2003 will have a bearing on the Republican's chances at the next election.
President Bush had asserted that Iraq was in possession of weapons of mass destruction and that the war was necessary for the protection of the United States. Whether that was really Bush's agenda was questionable, and I personally feel that the whole issue was about the control of middle-east oil. No WMD were eventually found, but the war has dragged on longer than anticipated and casualties have been mounting. More and more US parents have lost their sons and daughters in a war where the parents probably feel their children have no real business to be involved in and give of their lives. The Iraq campaign is fraud with complications, and one wonders if US troops can really pull out sooner (rather than later) with Iraq's internal conflicts and the Middle-East situation so unstable. No doubt the failure to end the war in Iraq will be exploited by the opposition to gain leverage in any political campaign. The war on Iraq had also drained a significant amount of US resources which could otherwise have been channeled to fund domestic programmes to benefit US citizens. At home, there are grouses about expensive health care, inadequate health insurances, poverty, lack of minimum welfare, the subprime housing issue and foreclosures, as well as recession fears lurking around. I think people are wondering if President Bush is concentrating too much on his foreign policy vis-a-vis doing more to address domestic issues at hand.
Since Bush's re-election at end-2004, Bush had received increasing criticism. He had high domestic rating immediately after 9/11, but his disapproval rating had since been climbing as the Iraq war dragged on and things are not looking up on the domestic front. So I would say that the Iraq War will in some way influence the outcome of the 2008 Presidential Elections scheduled in Nov 2008.
1 person likes this
@mehale (2200)
• United States
22 Jan 08
I have to admit that they never could prove the existance of those WMD's and I am still not sure what Bush's real agenda was. It may very well have had to do with oil. I only hope that a workable solution can be found before too many more of our troops die. You are probably right though. At least to a certain extent it will influence the election.
@Nikoko (11)
• Nigeria
22 Jan 08
The Republican are the cause of all this problem, when they come there is war, I think any president coming in should not withdraw the troops from Irag because if they do it will be grevious not only there but here in America. So i think they should finish what they have a started and Fish out does behind it. I think It be a deciding factor for me.
@mehale (2200)
• United States
22 Jan 08
While I will agree that we do not need to pull out just yet, and I also think that yes we should finish what we started, I just don't see how we will be able to actually win this war. I also am not sure that a democratic government will survive in Iraq after our troops are gone.