Which is the best Operating System Windows Vista ot Windows XP?
By billfrey
@billfrey (10)
Philippines
9 responses
@ubuntujason (196)
• United States
25 Jan 08
hey all~
wow good question, first off i would say the neither is the 'best' o/s out there. for that i would have to say, ubuntu (linux) hands down...but between those two i say its a toss up:
1. xp is established and has great support yet it is growing outdated and has many holes yet to be plugged
2. vista is edgy and slick looking, improved security and according to my 6 year old sister, more user friendly
1. xp is less expensive and has lower system requirements
2. vista is insanely priced and for it to function smooth it requires massive horse power from your machine
i tested some builds of vista...i would have to give it my vote all things considering due to the fact i think it has greater potential then xp has left!
~j
@santuccie (3384)
• United States
29 Jan 08
Ubuntu was the first Linux distro I tried, and it's got bugs of its own. It also doesn't have the degree of deployability; check the forums, and see what kinds of problems other users are having.
Personally, I use a lot of USB devices: a keyboard, a mouse, a printer/scanner/copier, and a few storage devices. One of these storage devices, a 2 GB Kingston flashdrive, stores over 80 portable applications, including my e-mail client.
Under every Linux distro I've tried (most recently Ubuntu, Mandriva, and Mint), the pointer would stop responding to the mouse, and portable apps would crash. The device running them would be inaccessible until after a reboot; terminating the stuck programs wouldn't change that.
In Ubuntu, I've had files disappear from my USB HDD and flashdrive that way. After the first USB crash, it got more and more frequent until the OS became useless, and buttons and icons disappeared from the taskbar.
This problem appears to exist in the Linux core itself, and has yet to be addressed. Interestingly, the Mac (BSD core) also has USB problems, though apparently more in the way of kernel panics when a device is first plugged in. Windows is the only platform that can handle real strain here.
Linux is not a replacement for Windows yet; it has a long way to go. That's why most Linux users still dual-boot, although many of them keep mum about it because it defeats their propaganda.
Windows just works, especially if you know how to take care of it. While Vista still has a lot of problems--bluescreens with illegible text and Disk Defragmenter getting crippled are just a couple--XP problems usually involve third-party software, and are easily fixed. Linux problems require more than diagnostics; they require debugging.
Until Vista matures, it's XP all the way.
@ubuntujason (196)
• United States
2 Feb 08
some interesting points. I havent had those problems while running ubuntu....i do have to conceed this though, i don't think linux, any distro, is quiet all ready to overtake windows...but i think that ubuntu is getting close.
i'm glad that we can all be respectful here in the thread :) and i even learned, i didn't know mac ran on a bsd core....i thought about giving bsd a try once, but the guy i talked to on the bsd forums was a real jerk so i gave up :P
~j
1 person likes this
@darkangel079 (1488)
• United States
25 Jan 08
It is not hard to say which one is better - read my long post and it will explain more in detail. Windows XP runs a lot better than Windows Vista.
@FreakQD (867)
• India
28 Feb 08
I would also suggest that Windows Vista is better when compared to XP. The only problem with Vista is that, it will ask our confirmation for each and everything and it really protects our system unlike XP where system can be easily affected by virus. Windows Vista introduces two features to make use of today's technology in order to improve the user experience. This means that more application data should be actively cached into all available memory (SuperFetch), whether that is physical RAM or a USB Flash memory device (ReadyBoost). Microsoft's goal was to create balanced performance by removing delays in everyday work. Although the main Windows Vista core has undergone lot of modifications, many of our applications will work with Vista. Process scheduling and thread pooling have been improved in Vista; a deadlock protection mechanism and hardware partitioning for virtualization support were added, together with many more features.
@santuccie (3384)
• United States
29 Jan 08
Vista seems to be more of an interim, security-focused operating system than a long-term platform. It was supposed to have a file system all its own; it's still using NT. It was still built upon the original core, which has gotten so big that probably no one will ever find all the bugs. It's not bad, but it's got some maturing to do, and given its size that could take a very long time.
Windows 7 will have a new core, and a much smaller one. I'm looking forward to it. In the meantime, XP is mature, is still the de facto standard, and supports the most stuffs. It's a lot more vulnerable than Vista, but you can lock it down if you have to: http://invincible-windows.blogspot.com/
@BranimirCro (36)
• Croatia (Hrvatska)
28 Jan 08
XP is better than Vista... but Linux is the best :D
@IddiKlu (176)
• United States
26 Jan 08
Vista has major problems since it is still missing a lot of drivers for programs and peripherals.
As if that wasn't bad enough, MS installed a lot of software to NOT allow usage of what their system perceives as copyrighted material.
I don't feel I want to pay for an OS that keeps an eye on what I want to do and throws sand into functions I need.
@retrac1324 (227)
• United States
28 Jan 08
Vista has better security and a nicer user interface.
XP is more compatible with older programs and is more reliable in the long run for now.
Service Packs for both Vista and XP are coming out soon.
@anapoc (16)
• Latvia
26 Jan 08
XP many times better. Vista is for users who dont use OS for administering it, but just looking at beautifull colors, gadgets, apllications and dont know more than MS Office, IE URL bar, paint, calculator (NOT scientific part) and outlook (which they didn configure by themselves).