Original or Prints?
@hillarietasche (32)
Canada
January 28, 2008 10:03pm CST
The age old question - Originals or prints: Which to sell as an artist!?!
How do you feel about this?
I sell original watercolors at http://hillarietasche.etsy.com
2 responses
@joanntheartist (67)
• United States
8 May 08
My own personal opinion is that to sell the originals is better. You can get more out of them, and they don't take up needed space in your studio. I personally don't have a hard time parting with my artwork, as I have given away lots of it since the time I started drawing. Some artists do, and their opinions may be different.
However, there are a few originals that someone would have to pay me enough money to payoff my mortgage and retire on before I'd sell them....lol
THose are the ones I hang in my living room.....hehe
@Sandpiper77 (14)
• Australia
30 Jan 08
I tried selling prints (which isn't really the right term as any printmaker will tell you as they tear their hair out. I think the term for commercial reproductions is glicee?).
But to make it economic you have to have quite a large print run and while that's ok for black and white if you want colour it becomes very expensive.
I also found that many buyers didn't want a 'copy'.
I like your watercolours. How well do they sell on Esty?