SHOULD BUSH BE TRIED FOR GENOCIDE?
By dubulas
@dubulas (22)
India
October 30, 2006 7:54am CST
US attacked Iraq saying that they possesed weapons of mass destruction. Till date, no WMD has ever been found. All that America has achieved is in capturing a single individual like Saddam and killing countless innocent women and children. Is this not a strong reason for trying Bush?
1 response
@ArsonCuff (3114)
• United States
30 Oct 06
Saddam's regime and sadistic govt. was not a SINGLE person...the world agreed that Saddam needed to be removed, they were just wanting to do it at a slower pace to work out the profits for everyone, whereas Bush wanted to be a cowboy....and what about the countless women and children Saddam, his regime, and his serial killer psycho sons were murdering?...depending on which religion a person happens to be in Iraq is how they show their support
@ArsonCuff (3114)
• United States
30 Oct 06
um...innoccent people were already being killed..it is the exact same excuse you are arguing...an atomic bomb to take out a mosquito..what the hell are you talking about? Saddam was the head of the evil that was commiting genocide...USA did not go in there after JUST him they took down the entire hoo-doo and now they've got terrorist running rampant all over the damn place because ..hmmm...it appears that it is the middle eastern places that are full of people wanting to kill poeple non-stop all the time..Bush thought he was going to be a cowboy and swoop in and save the day without realizing the severity of the situatation and how thick these killers had bred into the systems there
