How can you be against the war but support the troops?
By Benjaminna
@Benjaminna (300)
United States
February 16, 2008 6:27pm CST
I have heard this over and over again and I just don't get it. I would think that in order to support the troops (or anything else) - you would have to agree, understand and respect why they are over there and doing what they are doing. If you don't, how can you support it?
4 responses
@cynicalandoutspoken (4725)
• United States
17 Feb 08
I support our troops 110% and am 110% against the war.
When these soldiers signed their name on the dotted line saying they would protect our butts at all costs they knew there was a possibility that they would be facing a war. But they aren't the ones who started the war or signed their orders to go over there and fight in it.
I am completely against the war. We should be protecting our own people not sending them to a foreign country to get slaughtered for the freedoms of others.
But these soldiers are risking their lives and they deserve our support and our devotion.
1 person likes this
@Ciniful (1587)
• Canada
19 Feb 08
I wonder if you realize that your own analogy proves your point as wrong. Using your example, if your child is being bullied at school, and your advice is to tell him to fight back and not be intimidated, does that mean you support kids fighting? Do you support bullying?
It's very easy, and logical, to support the soldiers while NOT supporting the war they're forced to fight. I wonder if you have any idea how many soldiers disagree with this was, as well. Can you accuse them of not supporting the soldiers, even though that's what they are? It gets rather confusing, doesn't it?
The soldiers had no choice in the decision to go to war. They signed on to serve and protect their country, and deserve respect and loyalty for that. We can support THEM without supporting the orders they are given.
I can't believe you're having that much trouble understand the basic logic involved.
@Benjaminna (300)
• United States
20 Feb 08
Ciniful --
Seems like your more distressed over me even asking and attempting to understand the other side.
Geezzz.
@Benjaminna (300)
• United States
17 Feb 08
No, they are not the ones who started the war the idiots who bombed our trades buildings and hijacked our planes did. Yes, I know it's a hard concept for some to understand but by empowering others to have the strength to stand up for themselves and not being bullied around by a bunch of terrorist will have a great impact on world peace.
If your child was being bullied everyday after school and you found out about it, what would you do? Lock him up to protect him? Or would you try to teach him how to defend himself or have him take some defense classes.
@xParanoiax (6987)
• United States
17 Feb 08
I support them as soldiers. Soldiers follow orders, soldiers usually believe what they're doing is good.
War is not synonomous with soldiers. Many soldiers have not supported the war but obeyed because they didn't have any other choice.
There have been soldiers in times of peace.
I respect soldiers as a rule, and shake my head at the bad apples...but I fundementally believe, after doing much research on the subject that the war was either a huge mistake or done for greed. And I cannot support such things -- I'd give aid to soldiers if I could, and I'm in support of anyone who calls for the end of the war...but everyone has to draw the line somewhere.
A war is not the soldiers. A war is two nations of people, a decision.
And our President declared war without the consent on Congress, which technically is illegal.
Therefore, my support is given based upon motives.
Generally, soldiers motives are good and brave...but our President's -- no matter how well-meaning he was, are suspect.
Does this explain things properly?
1 person likes this
@Benjaminna (300)
• United States
17 Feb 08
I understand that there are probably soldiers who disagree with the war. Probably not as many as the main steam media would like you to believe. However - they did voluntary sign up for the military. In doing so they would have had to have enough faith and love in our country to do what is needed. Most of the soldiers believe in and are proud in what they are doing and have faith in our country. So no, I still don't understand how you can support the troops and not the war, since most of the soldiers support the war also.
@xParanoiax (6987)
• United States
18 Feb 08
Here, let me explain it another way...have you ever had a family member..a daughter, mother...whatever, and they had a choice. And it was their choice to make, and even though it wasn't something you could necessarily understand, or maybe not think is what's right...but you spport them anyway, because you still care about them?
It's kindof like that.
@Benjaminna (300)
• United States
20 Feb 08
I think I can relate to that.
Thanks!
1 person likes this
@MntlWard (878)
• United States
18 Feb 08
I don't support the war in Iraq, but it doesn't mean that I bear ill will toward the soldiers fighting it, even if those soldiers support the war.
I want the troops to be as safe as possible. I want them to have protective gear. I want the returning wounded to have proper medical care, and I feel the troops should not have to pay the medical expenses for wounds they received in fighting the war. I believe that servicemen should be allowed to end their service once they've fulfilled the agreement they swore, instead of being kept against their will.
1 person likes this
@youngam86 (151)
• United States
26 Feb 08
My husband is a marine but I am biased.
Some people join the service for humanitarium purposes. They don't always blow things up. They helped with Huricane Katrina and various other things.
I do not think that we should be in Iraq but I understand that my husband has signed a contract and has to do what his higher ups tell him to. He can't just say I quit.
It's really hard to convey.