Obama, what should Minimum Wage be set at?
By ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
February 20, 2008 1:08pm CST
Barak Hussein Obama stated that "no one who works should be poor".
Let's look at that statment, shall we?
If no one who works should be poor, he is saying that the income of everyone who works should be above the poverty line.
The poverty line for a single person in the U.S. in 2007 was, $10,787/yr. Based on a 40 hour work week, that comes to $5.19/hr.
For a couple, the line was, $13,884/yr, or a household income of $6.78/hr.
A household with with two adults and two kids is, $21,027/yr, or $10.11/hr.
The federal minimum wage is now $5.85/hr and will be increased to $6.55/hr in July 08.
Apparently minimum wage is already higher than it needs to be to meet Obama's wish. So what is his point?
http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/threshld/thresh07.html
8 people like this
17 responses
@lolalolacherrycola (899)
• United States
20 Feb 08
I really don't like any of the 2008 candidate. To me politicians are just that politicians.
In my opinion, this statement is to lure low income voters into voting for him. He makes a true statement, No one who works should be poor", however, he does not offer any solution to that. As for raising the minimum wage, that is not the solution either, as in order to raise the minimum wage, business owners will have to raise prices in order to offset the increase in wages. What good will that do?
People will just have to pay more for the same things and in the end will be back at square one.
6 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
20 Feb 08
Good on ya for seeing through his empty words.
5 people like this
@FireHorse (293)
• United States
25 Feb 08
It kind of makes you wonder exactly WHO decided what "poverty" is and HOW doesn't it? I wonder if they ever go grocery shopping or buy their own gasoline. I'd like like to see this person or group of people just TRY and live on the amount they have deemed just above poverty for one season, just 3 months at that level. I would really like to see them break their backs for 40 hours per week at minimum wage and pay rent, feed their kids and pay all their other bills! Ok, now try it with a part time job at that rate, since you've used OUR tax dollars to pay subsidize to huge corporations to move full time jobs over seas so those same companies can exploit people in other lands for even lower wages.
1 person likes this
@Celanith (2327)
• United States
20 Feb 08
The minimum wage was originally intended to support a single person not a family and that is part of the problem why we have poverty because employers don't want to pay a decent LIVING wage to workers and YES most of them CAN afford to and get a huge profit line. Especially burger chains and store chains. They just are greedy and don't want to pay workers anything. The minimum wage should be at least $12.50 an hour and go up from there and yes our economy could support it because people would have buying power. Instead employers sell jobs overseas under NAFTA which should NEVER have been allowed and or bring in illegals to work at below minimum wage or at it. It is not that Americans don't want to work it is they cannot afford to LIVE in America at minimum wage because rent, or housing, utilities, food, transportation and everything else is higher. You can live like a king in Mexico on minimum wage.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
20 Feb 08
Do you pay a living wage to people who you pay for services? (babysitters, lawn care...etc).
Just curious.
3 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
20 Feb 08
btw, no, a burger place wouldn't be able to sell burgers at a price we would be willing to pay if they had to pay their burger burners $12.50/hr.
4 people like this
@lolalolacherrycola (899)
• United States
21 Feb 08
I personally don't think raising the minimum wage is the answer. Prices will go up... a big mac will then cost $10, a can of pop will be $3 and mimimum wage earners will be screwed again.
4 people like this
@Smith2028 (797)
• United States
21 Feb 08
Well first and foremost, how dare you try to bring logic and reasoning into a campaign of a liberal. Remember all liberal arguments must be based on emotions and the issue of the day.
Secondly, the politicians aren't taking into account two different actions. Action 1) Those who are "poor" are those not wanting to work in order to take advantage of the welfare system.
Action 2) Those not wanting to work because the jobs "are below them."
The truth is, the poverty line is easily crossed by any American who strives to have a job and is wise with their money.
4 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
21 Feb 08
Yup, they act like the poor will stay that way unless Mommy and Daddy government pull them out of their poverty.
It's been how long since the "great society" and the give away programs have yet to pull one person out of poverty.
On the other hand, there are millions who took the initiative and worked and/or invested their way out of poverty.
But the mindless lambs need something to suck on, or they think they will die of starvation.
1 person likes this
@cynddvs (2948)
• United States
20 Feb 08
As of right now they only thing I've read is that Obama is for raising minimum wage to $7.25. While that's much better then it is right now I still think it needs to be higher then that. I guess we've got to start somewhere though. And I could see Obama asking for another increase in minimum wage after we reach the $7.25 mark.
3 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
20 Feb 08
Do you pay your babysitters, lawn care... etc... what you think minimum wage should be?
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
20 Feb 08
Blue collar workers choose their lot in life just like the rest of us.
I'm not rich, nor will I ever be. Why? Because of my own choices. I am a retired Army NCO. I could have been an Commissioned Officer and made more money, but I chose to be an NCO so I could train troops.
For the most part, the lifestyle people live is either by choice, or the result of their choices.
It is up to us as individuals to improve our lot in life if we want. It isn't the job of the government.
Obama is nothing but a bigot, spewing his hatred at "the rich". He is no better than any other bigot and deserves no more respect.
1 person likes this
@cynddvs (2948)
• United States
20 Feb 08
Babysitters getting paid minimum wage or higher are very rare simply for the fact that they are babysitting for extra money and not to make a living. Right now I pay $160 a month for my daughter to go to a Mother's Day Out program 2 days a week. That figures at $4. Yes it is under minimum wage. But there are 9 other children in my daughters class. So I really don't think babysitters are a valid argument on this one.
But I do get your point that higher wages would mean higher prices. So the real question is what to do to fix the poverty line so that blue collared workers and below aren't having to struggle.
4 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
20 Feb 08
That would be a good discussion in itself.
When I was an Army Specialist, we were eligible for food stamps, but I didn't consider us, "poor".
2 people like this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
21 Feb 08
"Their are some people who are 'poor' who have 2 cell phones, 2 cars, 5 TV's each with satellite on them, get their nails and hair done every week and still have money to spend."
Those people are sure not doing all that working for minimum wage with no other resources or income.
Annie
2 people like this
@Benjaminna (300)
• United States
21 Feb 08
Good question. Their are some people who are 'poor' who have 2 cell phones, 2 cars, 5 TV's each with satellite on them, get their nails and hair done every week and still have money to spend.
4 people like this
@gnarlybrowdude (68)
• United States
21 Feb 08
How is min. wage only 6.55? I live in Ohio and we get the shaft on everything in this state, but yet we still have a min. wage of $7.00.
3 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
26 Feb 08
True, most states have a minimum wage higher than the federal one.
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
21 Feb 08
No matter how one looks at it, a federally mandated minimum wage establishes a perceived value for an hours worth of work. There is no way that this perceived value can take into account variables, like the differences between committed and uncommitted employees.
Where:
(Committed worker = good worker, prepared worker, honest worker, etc...)
And
(Uncommitted worker = lazy worker, tardy worker, dishonest worker, etc...)
This is what socialists ALWAYS fail to consider. If you are telling both the committed worker and the uncommitted worker that each of their hours worth of work is identically valued at 'X', then why would the committed worker do any more work than the uncommitted worker?
A minimum wage is a Marxist/Communist initiative. Before you lambast me, please do your homework. My International Relations specialization was in US/Soviet Relations. So, I know a little about the Soviet Socialist/Communist Government, and how it functioned.
If the origin of the broad application of a minimum wage as being traceable to the Soviet Union isn't enough to make you shun it as unsound (Let's remember that there has never been a single successful example of a communist government), then the historical, repetitive result it has on the worker should be. These communist initiatives quite naturally lowered the work ethic of hourly employees! No if's, and's, or but's, about it! This is not conjecture or an opinion, it is a historical fact!
Ask yourself this one question: If you and your work-mate both do the same job, and you both earn the same wage. But, he or she is always 10 minutes late for work, aren't going to being to entertain the notion that it would be OK for you to be late as well?
Maybe at first you wouldn't. After a bit of time passes, you will most likely rationalize the first one or two times that you are late. After enough time has passed you will most likely find yourself always justifying your tardiness with the observation that "Well, so-and-so is late everyday. Why should I have to work 10 minutes longer than him or her, and not get paid any more for it?"
This is simple Human Nature!
When Government tries to function in a contrary state to Human Nature, trouble will soon follow!
3 people like this
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
22 Feb 08
Obama seems to be a lot of pretty talk with no real substance.
Anyone who really wants a job paying more than minimum wage should have no real problem finding it, and anyone who can't find it is just not trying.
Minimum wage is designed as an entry level wage for those just starting in the job market, and was never intended to make anyone rich.
What is needed is some personal responsibility and the desire to do whatever it takes to improve your personal circumstances, instead of waiting for the government to do it for you.
Given the figures provided, I guess that puts me at below the poverty line, but we are getting by just fine...even though the state is pulling close to $200 right off of the top due to back child support on a 25 year who didn't legally qualify in the first place.
Anyway, I know that someone can live at that income level, because I am doing it.
When I was working I was pulling in almost double what I get on SSA, and even then I was doing VERY well.
The problem is that too many people have no concept of money management, and that is a big reason they claim they can't make ends meet.
Minimum wage isn't the problem, the problem lies with the failure of people to take the responsibility for their own welfare.... but they don't want to hear that.
2 people like this
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
22 Feb 08
Hello Destiny,
You're right when you say: "The problem is that too many people have no concept of money management, and that is a big reason they claim they can't make ends meet."
Couple the lack of money management skills with unchecked consumerism, and viola we end up with people with 'maxed out' credit cards, hefty car payments, cable or satellite bills, cell phone bills, etc... People want, want, want --what they do not need, and what they cannot afford.
For example: I was reading a news story the other day where a 40year old man & his wife just borrowed $10,000 from their 401k to try to make ends meet. Of course, last April they bought a BMW335i to the tune of $550.00 per month. They knew the tax penalties associated with early 401k withdrawal, but opted to take the money out anyway because their three American Express credit cards are maxed out! This is not only foolish, it is dangerous! And, not just for the individual -- for the nation as a whole!
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
25 Feb 08
Chaz. "The rich" and "The poor" are both made up of people. Neither group can be summed up by any simplistic statement. To do so would be bigotry.
Why is it ok to despise "the rich"? Why is it ok to pity "the poor"?
There is no difference between lumping all "the rich" or "the poor" together and lumping "the Blacks" or "the Jews" or "the Mormons" together.
People are poor, people are rich, people are middle class. Each only describes their income bracket, not the people in it.
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
24 Feb 08
The rich got that way through hard work and innovation, and by recognizing an opportunity and running with it.
It is called capitalism and free enterprise, which is something that the liberals (socialists) oppose.
Your views on the rich are nothing more than an attempt to further the class warfare that the liberals are so adept at, which is amazing, seeing as how so many of them are in the rich category.
The rich pay the vast majority of the taxes in this country, while the poor and middle class do not.
If you want to blame anyone for the country's ills, blame BJ Clinton and NAFTA, for they are responsible for the great sucking sound of our jobs leaving. As someone recently said, Ross Perot was right about that.
These people ARE poster children because they are the prime examples of why people claim they can't make ends meet, because they tried living beyond their means, and beyond their ability to pay for their chosen lifestyle.
You will note that I used the word chosen. Life is all about the choices that we make.
They can't make ends meet because they don't have the slightest concept of money management, yet according to the story, he is an account executive.
If I was his employer and saw that article, he would have been demoted to janitor or mail clerk... someplace where he would have NO opportunity to screw up my business.
That's assuming of course that I didn't fire him for excessive stupidity.
Businesses have a reputation to uphold you know, and that guy would be a bad reflection on any business.
People need to stop blaming the rich, the government, Bush, and the Joneses for their economic woes, and start taking responsibility for their own circumstances.
The one thing we DON'T need is a nanny state, and we sure don't need socialism, statism, communism, progressives, or whatever else is the name of choice for the same group.
1 person likes this
@youdontsay (3497)
• United States
21 Feb 08
So, are you expecting the kids to make the same hourly wage? I'm confused. It seems to me if you are two adults working for minimum wage your income wouldn't increase when you had kids.
Admittedly I'm not a math person. But I just didn't understand how you were figuring that.
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
25 Feb 08
Chaz. I was merely stating a fact, I wasn't editorializing on it.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
21 Feb 08
No, the figures aren't minimum wage, they are the poverty line according to the U.S. government.
@youdontsay (3497)
• United States
20 Feb 08
You mean politicians are expected to have one?
3 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
20 Feb 08
So far, the politicians I've voted for have had one...
Obama doesn't have a point, nor does he have a record anyone can go on. So he just blathers on and on about nothing...
But when he does tell us what he's about, he shows himself to be about National Socialism and nothing more.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
21 Feb 08
First, I think we can all agree those poverty figures are full of it. I'd love to see anyone live on those annual salaries! I agree that no one who works full time should be poor, which to me they should be able to afford a roof over their heads, food enough so they don't go to bed hungry (I mean that within reason), health care, a vehicle to get them to work if they live where public transportation isn't available and even a few - GASP - little extras. Every time anyone has ever suggested raising the minimum wage we hear all these horror stories of how people will be put out of business, prices will skyrocket out of sight as will unemployment - guess what? It's never happened yet! I agree completely with Obama's proposal that the minimum wage increases should be tied in with inflation.
Annie
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
21 Feb 08
A mindless drone like you would.
Enjoy the nanny state, it's taylor made for people like you. People who want your mommy to raise you as a kid, then the government to raise you as an adult.
Tell me, who changes your diaper?
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
22 Feb 08
Chaz. Thanks for your mindless hatred and bigotry. You would really teach hatred for "conservatives" just because you disagree with us?
That is pretty pathetic of you.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
23 Feb 08
Thanks, Chaz, and no I don't let these mindless, hateful conservatives bother me at all. Case in point:
"Chaz. Thanks for your mindless hatred and bigotry. You would really teach hatred for "conservatives" just because you disagree with us? That is pretty pathetic of you."
This from someone who shortly before called me a "drone" among other things.
Annie
@Benjaminna (300)
• United States
21 Feb 08
What some people fail accept or understand is that it is up to each individual to work not to be poor. Everyone has the same opportunities than everyone else. However, some people choose not to exercise those opportunities.
3 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
21 Feb 08
Exactly. Now many people work very hard to stay poor. Those aren't lazy people, just people who have chosen jobs that will keep them poor.
1 person likes this
@Zorrogirl (1502)
• South Africa
24 Feb 08
this is an excelent discussion. i have again the perfect example to why this would not work. here in south africa, people wanted instant wealth. so dear government practically doubled minimum wage. now most employers overload their current workers and no one new gets appointed. now poverty has trippled. another point is that some people would have gotten more but minimum wage is all they get. how will poverty be gone with such stupidity?
1 person likes this
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
24 Feb 08
Great points, Zorrogirl!
I work in a small, very liberal city here in the U.S. Two years ago the City Council voted to mandate a living wage, tied to inflation.
Since then, three things have happened.
1. Employment has been flat. Meaning that new hires are at all time lows.
2. Many small businesses, which were located within the city limits have since them moved their business to outside of the city limit. They've moved their operations to the county to avoid the city's "living wage". Which, of course means that now people have to drive farther to their jobs, using more fuel for their vehicles. This puts a financial strain on the individual, the city, and the nation because of increased dependence on automobile fuel.
3. Illegal immigrants are finding this city to be more of a sanctuary than ever. More people are hiring people 'under the table', to avoid having to pay the mandated "living wage". While neighboring states are writing tough legislation to force illegal immigrants out of their state, they are coming to my state because there are 'under the table' jobs here for them.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
26 Feb 08
LadyLuna... aren't you glad the City Counsel was there to "help"? ;~D
1 person likes this
@Foxfire1875 (2010)
•
21 Feb 08
What he might be saying is that everyone should earn a living wage, not a minimum wage, there is a difference and I don't know what the cost of living is like in America but the figures quoted look pretty low to me.
If it is anything like britain, the minimum wage here is pathetic and should be higher so that it becomes a living wage.
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
21 Feb 08
Then what do we do when the increase in the wages leads to higher prices, which raises the cost of living?
What other prices do you think should be mandated by the government?
@kingcrapper (1536)
• United States
25 Feb 08
I think the real point is...how many people are banging down the door for minimum wage jobs? We, atleast in my area, have had many high paying automotive jobs leaving and everyone is sitting around waiting for more to show up (I think they will be waiting for awhile!). On the other extreme you have the people who have no intentions of getting a job because it will interfer with their government handouts. The idea of a solid work ethic is gone in this country. What ever happened to a parent thinking outside the box for the advancement of their children...making the next generation have it better than us?
1 person likes this
@lancingboy (1385)
• United States
26 Feb 08
I think minimum wage should be for the teenage students with after school jobs. They should have another set amount for adults as a "minimum wage", if you know what I mean.
This problem could be better solved if High School students had to take a course in money management. That way, they will (hopefully) make better money spending decisions in their life after school.
@vera5d (4005)
• United States
24 Feb 08
I think his point is even people who are above poverty are still "poor"...my hubby works 70 hrs a week...we barely make it each month...we don't live extravagantly...having to take the kids to the doctors or get our only car fixed or being sick & missing a day can really throw us of for a month.
anyone who works his tail off should not be wondering if he has enough money in his bank account to buy groceries...
i'd like to add my hubby has 2 bachelor's degrees...so it is not like he is uneducated & working at mcdonalds...he did everything people are "supposed" to do to have a good job - it is just too hard for people to ever get ahead...
the average monthly mortgage payment is $1200...working minimum wage 40 hrs a week would only give you a little over $800 - don't forget you have to pay taxes...if you want insurance that's another $150 deducted...
Even at $10/hour it is impossible to get by - I barely supported myself & a kid on $12/hr in the crappiest $425/month apartment I could find - I made "too much" money for assistance or insurance...
I think $7 should be the minimum for dependants (teens under 18 working at places) and $9 for college students and $15 for anyone who has a college degree
I couldn't even fathom hiring someone for less than $10 an hour - that's why I don't work because I'd have to pay the baby sitter just as much as I earned.
so maybe obama is "technically" off by 66 cents an hour for minimum wage...That $105.60 extra a month doesn't make much difference at all - unless maybe you're trying to get assistance and they tell you earn too much to qualify or they start taking that much if not more out of your paycheck for taxes...we spent $120 at the grocery store for 2 weeks of groceries buying just the necessities