Is it wrong to share information?

@ellie26 (4139)
Malaysia
March 7, 2008 12:12pm CST
Well, my two 'discussions' on "The danger of eating chicken wings" which claimed that eating chicken wings or neck is a health hazard were deleted. Thankfully, it was found out to be false. It is shocking to know how sharing an information can be so offensive or even dangerous to some. Was the information too sensitive? Was it wrong sharing opinions on this matter? The claims on eating chicken wings is a health hazard were emailed to me and I was equally shocked about it. The alternative way to know the truth about it is through sharing information. But this is sadly misinterpreted. The question is, how reliable is the investigation result on the "false information"?
4 people like this
9 responses
@foxyfire33 (10005)
• United States
7 Mar 08
Hmm...well I agree with you that the only way for us to learn anything is by sharing information...and filtering out what turns out to be false. In that sense I think your posts were justified and understandable. But here's where I see the problem...and this is just from the short amount you wrote here so there may be more details I don't know. First it's against the guidelines to purposely post duplicate discussions on the same topic. If you had two discussions about this that could have led to the deletions. Secondly, while copy/paste is allowed, we're supposed to add our own thoughts to things we copy/paste here. You said you got the information as an e-mail so maybe they got deleted because you didn't add anything of your own. And my third thought is...since the claim turned out to be false the discussions may have been considered to be speading an urban legend. While I don't believe there is anything specific in the guidelines against that, it's generally frowned upon for obvious reasons. As to your final question things are as reliable as people want them to be. In the case of the chicken wings/necks, if someone felt very strongly about it they probably could find a study supporting the claim...which would then create confusion about whether the claim was true or not. !000 studies could say it is false but it only takes one study to cast doubt.
1 person likes this
@ellie26 (4139)
• Malaysia
7 Mar 08
Firstly, I specifically added my own words"I like to share with you "(copy and pasted email's content)". Please share your opinion...". Secondly, I didn't duplicate my discussion but merely using almost the same subject heading except that I added a "Part 2". Thirdly, from my discussion, some did their investigations and it turns out to be false. And they shared their findings with mylotters, which I think is a positive and fruitful discussion. Finally, I think as a result from my discussions, people will be extra careful with the validity of any kind of informations they received. I just think they didn't the beginning to the end of my discussion before jumping into conclusion.
@foxyfire33 (10005)
• United States
7 Mar 08
Ok, well like I said I was basing my response on what little information you gave in this post. I didn't see either of the two that got deleted. Since you did add something of your own...maybe someone didn't feel it was enough of your own, people can get petty here. I don't really understand the "part 2" part since I didn't see them but again maybe someone was being petty. And I agree about the last part, discussing is a key way in finding the truth to any subject. How is that any different than me posting about still nursing my 15 1/2 month old? Some people will think I'm doing a good thing, others will disagree with my choice, still others will simply be educated on the subject. Either way the discussion will lead to a lot of thought on the subject and that's the whole point. If your posts did the same thing then I personally don't see the problem...but again some people can be petty and probably didn't take the time to actually read it all.
1 person likes this
@ellie26 (4139)
• Malaysia
7 Mar 08
Thank you for your kind understanding. The discussion I started was "The danger of eating chicken wings". When I read some were disagreeing about the content, I got the feeling they didn't really read the entire discussion. So, instead of responding each and everyone with the same response, I decided to start a new discussion of the same topic and added a "Part2" at the end of the topic (Danger of eating chicken wings - Part 2).
@olivemai (4738)
• United States
7 Mar 08
I was trying to read your discussion and saw that it had been deleted! I checked the guidelines to see what was the violation. I could not finish reading your post, only the part that showed up in my email, so I do not know exactly what is was that you did wrong. Probably was the duplication of posts! Snopes i good enough, but I have found information that snopes said was false, yet it was actually controversial information that some scientists said was true and some said was false!
@ellie26 (4139)
• Malaysia
7 Mar 08
I dont know what I did wrong. I did not duplicate my discussion or illegally copyrighted. I only copy and pasted an email I received about health hazard on eating chicken wings and its necks. I wrote that I wanted to share the email I received with mylotters and to get their thoughts about it, thats all.
1 person likes this
@olivemai (4738)
• United States
7 Mar 08
I saw that at least three discussions were deleted today! I did not get to read the rest of the discussion, only the part that shows up in email! I guess it is too much like yahoo answers, where people can get you deleted for dumb reasons!
1 person likes this
@olivemai (4738)
• United States
7 Mar 08
It may have been a copyright violation? I would not be surprised.
1 person likes this
@sedel1027 (17846)
• Cupertino, California
7 Mar 08
You should always, always verify things you receive by email. There are many websites like www.snopes.com that have valid proof that a claim is true or false. You can even verify that information if you are worried about its validity.
1 person likes this
@sedel1027 (17846)
• Cupertino, California
7 Mar 08
What you do is before posting, you read your email, got to snopes and find out if it s real or not, then start a post about it. You can always post it with the same question then you don't have to worry about people like me confirming you post and bugging you about it LOL
1 person likes this
@ellie26 (4139)
• Malaysia
7 Mar 08
If I validated it first then I wouldn't be bother to share it here. What would my discussion be? A false email about chicken wing for all to share?
@ellie26 (4139)
• Malaysia
7 Mar 08
Ok. Thank for your tips.
@ESKARENA1 (18261)
7 Mar 08
Even if the information turns out not to be validated, why is the discussion deleted? What about those who write about religious belief, what if they turn out to be wrong, are their discussions deleted too? What a silly thing to do. Someone must have taken the time to both check out the information and report their findings to mylot.. M,y advice to them is to get a life keep on posting blessed be
1 person likes this
@ESKARENA1 (18261)
5 Apr 08
hey, thankyou for best response, always much appreciated blessed be
1 person likes this
@ellie26 (4139)
• Malaysia
7 Mar 08
Thats what I thought. Sometimes thing like this really disappointing.
1 person likes this
• Philippines
7 Mar 08
I think you are just concerned and that's why you created a discussion about "The danger of eating chicken wings". There is nothing wrong in being concerned, ellie26. Luckily, the information was proved to be false, so there is no imposing threat once we enjoyed our favorite treat, the chicken wings. The moral of the story is, we just don't need to believe immediately but confirm the information relayed to us as well.
1 person likes this
@ellie26 (4139)
• Malaysia
8 Mar 08
You are so right, crOssf41lr13. We shouldn't believe everything we read. We should counter check it. For me, I counter check it validity with mylotters. I did some counter checking with mylotters some time ago about emails I received i.e. the lottery winning email. From the feedback I received, the emails were actually scam lottery winnings. So, I learned something that the next time I received emails like that, I should ignore and delete it.
• Canada
7 Mar 08
There is nothing wrong with sharing information. There is something wrong with sharing false information, IF you know of a site to check it out to make sure it is accurate. snopes.com is the one I use. Being offensive, well I don't know about that, I don't think it is offensive when making a mistake or sharing info. The problem is when those morons that started the false info to begin with sent it out. Many times it has caused harm. It also causes fear, panic and that can lead to harm. I was ignorant about snopes.com and would pass on emails, until one day, my niece wrote to me, telling me about the email I had sent her. Apparently one of her friends used one of the "remedies" and ended up in the hospital. It was because I had forwarded it on to my niece, and she onto her friends. Now, if I get an email with stuff like that, or even "stories" I check it out first, then, if all the addresses are showing from the previous emailers, I send on the correct information and the link to the page proving the falsehood. As far as I am concerned, there isn't enough investigations on these hoax emails. Considering the safety factor, one would think there would be more resources to fact find.
• Canada
8 Mar 08
Too many people skim read, they never really take time to think, see or understand the main post. I understood your discussion as to be asking whether or not sharing was good or bad and you used the chicken wings email as the example. I do not see anything wrong with that post at all. If I offended you with my response, I apologize, that wa snot my intent. My intent was to let ALL who read it to be away that forwarding emails are dangerous. That is someone knows about a site like snopes.com and is too lazy to take the time to check, then they are not a true friend. Why would people want to forward fear, dangerous misinformation, etc to their friends and family IF they know how to check it out first is something I cannot understand. Your English is great!!! I admire people who can read, write, and speak other languages! My brain is not one that is able to bend to this area. :( I think I shall start a new discussion asking for everyone to post those sites.
@ctrymuziklvr (11057)
• United States
8 Mar 08
I usually check information out before I write about it and snopes is a good site but I also use urban legends because that's what a lot of the information we hear about is. Don't worry about any information being wrong it happens to the best of us.
@dandan07 (1906)
• China
19 Dec 08
I do not think so. We can get a lot fo good from sharing the information. We can know a lot of new knowledge from that way. But some people think that sharing will make them lose the advantage in the comprtition. I think that kind of idea can not be accepted. If you do not like to share yours with other people, you aslo can not get something useful from other, so what you have is small, can not compared with other group.
@Ldyjarhead (10233)
• United States
7 Mar 08
There is nothing wrong wish sharing information, just check it out before you send it. Its not hard to do, and there's always going to be someone who believed what you sent and didn't find out later that it was proved false. snopes.com is the best site to check for things that may seem pretty far out there.
1 person likes this
@ellie26 (4139)
• Malaysia
7 Mar 08
Probably snopes.com is a short cut to validate a findings. But is it wrong to get more informations by discussing openly?