spoilers of tonights show
By vivasuzi
@vivasuzi (4127)
United States
March 18, 2008 8:57pm CST
Possible spoilers if you haven't seen tonight (tuesday)'s show What if.... What if Sharon had not talked to James before the POV? What if Sharon did not say she was 100% sure Matt was the 3rd vote?
So James' other option was to put Adam up. He was pretty positive that Adam was the third vote. I'm just wondering how you think it would have gone down. I imagine Adam would have been TICKED b/c he was not the third vote. I also imagine Adam would have gone home b/c James is so mad thinking that Adam was the third vote and would have had everyone with him.
Isn't it funny how 1 conversation can change the entire game.
Here's another What if? What if Sharon was lying? What if Sharon really didn't know that Matt voted for James and instead just said it to get rid of Matt? We know that Sharon really did know Matt was the 3rd vote, but just What if? You can say anything you want to your friends in this house and they will trust you, as long as no one says anything about it later!
2 people like this
7 responses
@ravinskye (8237)
• United States
19 Mar 08
wow thats too many what ifs lol. i think if sharon had been lying then it would have come out eventually, but probably not till after matt had gone out. Adam got so lucky. he was protesting too much that he wasn't the third vote, it did kind of make him look guilty. i can't wait to see matt go home. I don't think anyone but natalie will vote for matt to stay.
@vivasuzi (4127)
• United States
19 Mar 08
Haha, I got a little out of control with the what ifs :) I guess I'm getting paranoid like those ppl on BB!
I agree if Sharon had lied they wouldn't have found out until Matt was gone. I don't know if I think Adam was protesting too much b/c I think I would have acted similar (I wouldn't have to swear though) but I would be frustrated if the person didn't seem to believe me. I think however that I would have asked others in the house to talk to James. Adam could have gone to Sharon and asked her what she knew, and perhaps it would have came out that she knew Matt did it, and it all could have came out right there. But instead Adam just kept saying it wasn't him instead of saying the reasons he thinks it was matt.
1 person likes this
@cortjo73 (6498)
• United States
19 Mar 08
That would have sucked! I thought about that too. I felt bad for Adam when, at first, James didn't believe him. James totally read Adam's reaction wrong. When I have been accused of something that I did not do, I get fierce about it to. It makes me so mad. Especially when there is nothing I can do to prove my innocence. I would have reacted exactly like Adam did. So, I was glad when Sharon told him what she knew. I would have hated to see Adam go up for what Matt did.
1 person likes this
@vivasuzi (4127)
• United States
19 Mar 08
I thought James read his reaction way off. Adam was instead annoyed, frustrated and offended that James did not believe him, yet James took it as trying too hard to cover it up. I get mad when people acuse me of things that I know to be false! In fact, if I'm not highly defensive, then I probably was lying in the first place :-D
I was glad Sharon told him too b/c Adam did not deserve to go, at least not for that reason. It reminds me of BB last season where Eric was the odd vote out twice and got someone else in trouble both times. At least we know that Eric was forced to vote the way he did in that instance.
1 person likes this
@vivasuzi (4127)
• United States
19 Mar 08
One thing I always think of on BB is that I wish there was some way they could see things or find things out. Like maybe a contest where the winner can ask about any one person and find out who they voted for. It would be interesting to see the truth come out and not just gossip!
Ok, so they probably won't do that. But how about this: after the show is over, tape the contestants as they watch it and see their reactions when they learn the truth! Like do this before they go home so that they won't hear any of the spoilers. I'd LOVE to see their reaction to some things. They don't have to show them ALL the episodes, but just the parts and secrets that caused the drama.
1 person likes this
@cortjo73 (6498)
• United States
19 Mar 08
That is how I am. If I am not fighting loudly about being accused of something that I am saying I did not do, than you can tell I am lying. I was frustrated that James didn't believe Adam. I just hope that James learned that he read that wrong and keeps it in mind for the future, in and out of the BB house.
1 person likes this
@minnie_98214 (10557)
• United States
19 Mar 08
It is funny how they can say dont trust what anyone says yet the same person will base a huge decision on one persons statement. Its called beleiving what you want to beleive.
1 person likes this
@vivasuzi (4127)
• United States
19 Mar 08
It seems to be the "who is more convincing game" around here. They say they shouldn't trust anyone, then totally flip flop based on a statement. He seemed to take Sharon's statement as absolute truth even though Sharon had no proof that it was really Matt. It's because the way she said it was convincing!
Perhaps Adam could have been more convincing if he would have told James all the reasons why it had to be Matt. However, instead Adam just kept defending himself and not focusing on Matt.
Finally, how did James no for 100% that Sharon and Josh voted him back in? Far as he knows, Sharon could have been the 3rd vote!
1 person likes this
@groomtobe23 (635)
• United States
26 Mar 08
It made me wonder about Sharon.... but only for a split second. She has quickly become the person that I actually want to win in the house, and it would be very cool if she was able to go all the way. By a miracle she got back in the house, and now she really does have a good chance to stay under the radar and bring home the win. Go Sharon!
1 person likes this
@raychill (6525)
• United States
20 Mar 08
Okay I couldn't remember if I responded to this before or not. But okay...
I have to say that I don't like Sharon. In general. She's actually pretty smart and she catches on fast and that's a good thing for the game, but just in general I don't like her.
While I don't really like James' tactics, I have to say that I do like James because like ED last year...he does really know how to play the game. I think he's a complete hypocrite and I think he's stupid for calling things out like that. I think it's incredibly stupid that he went after Matt because Ryan is really the one they should have gotten out. But, In general I think James seems to know what he's doing and playing the game and he'll be tagging Chelsia along all the while. That's why he didn't like that Matt and Natalie were still teamed. He's a hypocrite.
This house is crazy this year. There are so Many What If's.
1 person likes this
@vivasuzi (4127)
• United States
21 Mar 08
I agree that Sharon's not the greatest person to watch personality wise, but you are right, she is smart. She knows when Matt is trying to play her, she seems to know what's going on in the game all the time. I have yet to hear her say that something surprised her.
I don't really know for sure if I agree that James knows how to play. I feel like he is playing on Emotion and got rid of Matt b/c of it, when really I think Ryan is a bigger threat b/c of the fact that more people like Ryan. I just saw in that episode how easily his mind was swayed by each person he spoke to and it made me think that anyone could influence him if they tried hard enough.
1 person likes this
@vivasuzi (4127)
• United States
25 Mar 08
I think ED did it more to get people angry and off center by calling them out. James bugged me more b/c he was calling ppl out and acting self-righteous as if he was perfect. I think James just gets to me b/c when he gave all his speeches he was acting as if he is better then everyone, and then he turns around and does the same thign.
Matt wasn't playing with Natalie, Natalie was playing with Matt :) And Matt knew she'd always be there. But I think that if Matt had the option, he would have played with Ryan.
The thing with James is, I think he's going day by day. He cuts deals thinking he is going to keep them, and then people talk to him and he changes his mind completely. I really think he only broke his deal with Nat and Matt b/c Sharon was so positive that Matt was the third vote. I think up until then he had every intention of keeping his word.
I will never know why everyone voted him back in! Especially Natalie, what a dumb butt. She's the reason Matt went home b/c she didn't vote for the mystery box.
1 person likes this
@raychill (6525)
• United States
21 Mar 08
And you think that ED didn't play on Emotion last season? Did he not call people out on things too? And wasn't he playing WITH someone the entire game? and who made it to the end? Who won?
I'm not saying James is gonna make it necessarily cause he already got kicked out once. I also don't think he should have kicked out Matt but in some ways it was the smarter choice. Matt said whatever he thought people wanted to hear. Matt was playing with Natalie really. Natalie was obviously strong and was fighting for him. Since James is obviously going to try to keep Chelsia around he couldn't have someone else who is playing with someone else.
He's really not making completely dumb moves. But in some ways there are no completely smart moves either.
I'm just saying that James kind of seems to know what he's doing. Cutting deals that he's not going to keep. Keeping things out in the open so no one else can really cut deals like he can. Obviously even though everyone voted him out... they wanted him back. So he's doing something right.
1 person likes this
@arkiegurl (2)
•
19 Mar 08
These people share a brain. They can't make decisions and stick to them. They are so easily swayed by others.
1 person likes this
@vivasuzi (4127)
• United States
19 Mar 08
Yep they do seem to change their mind after each conversation. Who knows, Chelsea could have came in after Sharon and told James that sharon was a total liar and he would have changed his mind again!
I think in this house people get so paranoid and all they do is THINK and come up with things in their head that aren't true.
1 person likes this
@mytwo_daughters (2663)
• United States
27 Jun 08
yep, I'm just getting to this. You're talking big brother. Shame it got so sleazy I wasn't able to watch grown up tv with the girls around. It used to be good, now it is just sleaze.