The Effectiveness of myths in facilitating the talk of God
By jvego7426
@jvego7426 (153)
March 26, 2008 8:26pm CST
Myths are stories formed out of symbols. People created it almost in everything they find unusual -things beyond literal description. They make a story on how it became like that and where it originated. This includes at some point, God, and how He created everything including human. Their thoughts that have developed and that has been carried out through the present time. In every myth, it reflects the insights and values of people and their culture. This then creates a link between the people, their culture and their belief in God. As God is seen as divine, cannot be described literally and so myths were used to express religious intuitions about what God is like and what He does -coming from the gathering together of symbols. Myths are in form of stories and are easy to understand. I stops the curiousness of people, putting and answer to a question right away pretty straightforwardly.
But on the other hand, applying it to the present time. Being unscientifically based can be seen by people as untrue. For the simple reason that myths by common language at this present time tend to have a fictional/untrue description. And also people have come up with more effective and somewhat more convincing explanation to things which are scientifically base (ie evolution).
1 person likes this
2 responses
@barehugs (8973)
• Canada
27 Mar 08
Everybody likes a good story, and if it fills a need, that's even better. The Bible is a book of Myths that explain the unexplainable in Fairy-tale fashion. However its important to Remember that Myths are just that, Someones imaginary attempt to explain the Mystery and Wonder of our Lives in this Mysterious World of the third dimension. Theses Myths fill a need, but are not, and never were, intended to be the literal truth
@jvego7426 (153)
•
27 Mar 08
I agree! Myths are cleverly formed and can be seen effective at the time it was made. And that the meaning behind it or the kerygma of myth is the one that should be taken more into account. This is what you get if you demythologize myths.
I appreciate your comment!
@kulaskulasito (430)
• United States
10 Apr 08
Pal, I really don't know what are you actually up to? You did a deconstruction of the whole mythological process, but I believe you came short of stating where this is actually leading us to.
What's your point man? I mean, your title puts the effectiveness of myths in facilitating the talk of God, and therein after, in your postulates, you kind of started to deconstruct the scaffold into which your title rests.
Now what?
If you have well dismantled the whole mythological thinking of the ancients, then what do we have? - a facility of talking about God bereft of any myth because they don't tell truths but, what did you say?, "insights and values of people and their culture?" So how can we talk God if all these scientific genuis-ness brings into bare the untenability of myths which was used to facilitate.
What do you suggest we do man? Think you left us with nothing?