Advice needed
By LouRhi
@LouRhi (1502)
Australia
March 30, 2008 6:33pm CST
In a bid to regain some of my writing stars I am currently rewriting and leapfrogging.
I was wondering if any of my fellow myLotters have any advice on this article
http://www.helium.com/items/834617
It is poorly ranked 5/7 and I am not sure whether that is because of bad luck or bad writing. Have a read and tell me what you think. Are there any changes I could make?
Many thanks and may in every way this be a special day
3 responses
@fizzytom (752)
• Maribor, Slovenia
31 Mar 08
Hi! I just took a look at your article. I like your style of writing. Just the type that HElium likes.
Now, I also looked at the other articles in the group and while your article is good, others are a little more comprehensive or don't quite agree with what you are saying. I don't know whether this might affect the rating process.
It's not always necessary to make major changes to leapgfrog an article. Sometimes you can make very minor changes and just amending typos or changing one or two words is enough because sometimes all you need is fresh eyes rating articles. Leapfrogging puts your article back in the mix. Good luck!
@LouRhi (1502)
• Australia
31 Mar 08
Hi Fizzytom,
Thanks for the positive and encouraging feedback. It is nice to be given a shimmer of hope when it feels like you have been absorbed into darkness.
Hopefully a little tweek here and there will do the trick.
~ may in every way this be a special day ~
@thingywhatsit (77)
• France
31 Mar 08
Your link does not work, but I can guess what is wrong without looking at the article. Either you have no spacing between paragraphs or your opening paragraph and ending paragraph are not strong enough. If you work out that even bad raters will read openings and closings, these are the pivot that dictate how well your article is rated.
If you leapfrog pay attention to how you open and close the article, and do spellcheck and check your layout.
Rachel
@LouRhi (1502)
• Australia
31 Mar 08
Sorry the link did not work for you. I tested it when I posted and again just now and it seemed to work just fine for me.
I do have white spaces between my paragraphs I am a huge believer in spaces.
I will take on board what you said about the paragraphs and bad raters.
I must say your opening lines about knowing what is wrong without looking is rather offensive. I realise that you are a highly respected and well written Helium writer but you are not very welcoming.
I have had you critique my work before and found that you can be harsh and abrasive so I am trying not to take your comments personally.
I mean how are you to know whether I am vulnerable or not right now.
Thanks for taking the time to comment
@thingywhatsit (77)
• France
31 Mar 08
Hello,
I did not mean to come over as harsh or abrasive and am sorry that I am perceived in this way. I work with perhaps 300 new members a week on Helium and my assumption was based on my experience of people and approach to Helium. I can now access your article and would make the following observations.
1. It isn't rated highly enough. It is informative and contains more information than others in the category.
2. The layout is what lets it down. Having odd sentences as headings but not making them clear enough as being headings turns up in the rating box as bitty.
None of what I say is meant to be critical and I am sorry if I come over as being so. I am passionate about helping writers to gain maximum potential on the site, and if your article was changed to pose the questions which are now posed in single sentences in some kind of highlighted way, i.e. perhaps capital letters for titles, I think the article would do better.
The other way you could present it in a better way would be to expand on the questions and make them into paragraphs. I really am trying to help here and am upset that I have indeed upset you or any other member with comments and suggestions.
@LouRhi (1502)
• Australia
31 Mar 08
Sorry Rachel, I didn't mean to upset you either. I fear I was a bit harsh on you and I do apologise.
I was having a terrible day and reading your first comment didn't help at all. Though that was no excuse to treat you like I did when you were only trying to be helpful.
I am glad that you were able to read the article, I will have a look at the sentence structure and possible headings.
I realise that I have a great deal of improvements to make within my writing techniques and I really do welcome criticism. It is not possible to improve without it.
Thanks again and no hard feelings
@Writerbob (572)
• United States
31 Mar 08
I concur with the others, after reading your article (btw, I'm also on helium under the same username, writerbob). There is little to quibble about with the content, the organization is a bit clunky but in general it is above the usual quality on helium.
The topic itself doesn't lend to an exciting, ultra-informative approach, so I wouldn't rewrite, just use the energy to create new topics.
@LouRhi (1502)
• Australia
31 Mar 08
Thanks for your comments Writerbob. I am going to have a look at the structure and organisation now. I know that you said you didn't think it was worth a rewrite but I am going to. I was the first writer on this topic and I put a fair bit of effort (well more than usual) into research so getting number one is important as I can see that most people have just written their article based on my information!
Thanks again for your kind words. I will have a look at you on helium