Should we just do away with the Constitution

@gewcew23 (8007)
United States
April 4, 2008 12:56pm CST
Is it just me or does anyone really care about the Constitution anymore. I am a Constitutionalist, but it does seem that we are a dying breed. What this Country was founded on has been ignored. I would love to see just one politician(except for Ron Paul) that would stand up for the whole Constitution, and not just bits and pieces. Do I just need to give up? If one part of the Constitution does not matter then should any of the Constitution matter?
3 responses
• United States
4 Apr 08
Surely, this is a sad topic, but I understand what you are saying. In the past I've suggested we write a new one, but do we want the current crop of liberals writing our new constitution? We have been ignoring the constitution for so long that many of violations of its clear wording are not even thought about by most Americans. Want an example? The mininimum wage law is clearly unconstitutional. Remember, the constitution says there can not be any law respecting contracts between individuals. Or was it private contracts? Anyway, when someone agrees to work for someone at a certain wage, that is a contract. The law saying it has to be for at least a certain amount is clearly unconstitutional. There are many more common everyday violations of the constitution.
2 people like this
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
4 Apr 08
I was a little depressed when I started this discussion. I know that I should not let my emotions run into my discussions, but it did. I have read one to many discussion about bailing out the mortgage industry, and got loan through this companies. Also hearing the speaches down in Memphis from those three talking about ending proverty just sent me into a tail spin. I will try next time to have a more positive discussion.
1 person likes this
• United States
4 Apr 08
Please, I completely understand. When Hillary said she would appoint a cabinate level position to eliminate poverty I wondered if she knew that to eliminate poverty all we need is for the current cabinate to do its job. If the country is protected, the budget balanced, and the rest of the government departments doing their jobs, guess what? The country would be prosperous and poverty would be eliminated. Where are our political parties finding these numbskulls to run for high office?
2 people like this
@heathcliff (1415)
• United States
5 Apr 08
The reason the US Constitution has outlasted so many other state-creating-documents has been it's adaptability and openness to interprettation. "Constitutions" that have since attempted to lay down every law and possible exception have failed in some form. The brevity and simplicity of the document enabled our founders to lay a foundation upon which a quality form of government could be based. It does not answer every question for us, nor does it attempt to solve every possible problem. It establishes a government that operates empowered by the people and run by people to solve problems as they arise and adjust laws as needed. It gives so much power to every sitting Congress that it almost places itself on a shelf after creating the government. The Bill of Rights, created seperately from The Constitution itself, limits the power of the newly formed government, ensuring individual freedoms but still allowing a huge amount of interprettation. Without such ability to form our own path every generation, our society would eventually stagnate and decay like so many societies before us. We can never ignore what the Constitution sets forth, but, especially since it does not answer every question, we also must respect what it tells us to do: Make a government that is capable of deciding for itself. What you seem to have a problem with is people. People, who through their own free will, have decided to view things a little differently from you. If you are hoping they will be silenced by invoking a strict interprettation of the Constitution, you are focusing on the wrong parts of the great document yourself. The answer to your questions then is: No, We Will Not Get Rid Of The Constitution, And Yes, A Huge Majority Of People Still Care About It, for the very reason that it has established a government that can adapt and respond to different pressures. It allows for this sort of debate and ultimately was establshed to put PEOPLE in charge, not a piece of paper!
1 person likes this
• United States
4 Apr 08
its an elastic document, its meant to be changed and represent the current times. if there are parts that dont matter then they need to be changed to matter and reflect the views of the current majority.
• United States
5 Apr 08
The Constitution is NOT elastic, and it was written to endure, not change on the whims of social engineers. While it may be amended, it must never be changed... unless you no longer value your freedom.
2 people like this
• United States
5 Apr 08
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/amend note definition two. "to CHANGE or modify"
• United States
5 Apr 08
also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necessary-and-proper_clause