What...smoking has no effects on you?
By bluemars
@bluemars (952)
Australia
April 6, 2008 10:24pm CST
Well that is a load of rubbish that I have been hearing. I know the truth about smoking and am not going to be blinded by smokers who want to make smoking okay and have others believe that in fact it is good for you and your health. That truly makes me laugh. I know they are afraid of the new laws and upcoming bans that have already been imposed in many enclosed areas but seriously this will not stop them so why they are worried I have no clue, they still go out to have their habit and do it when they please. Are they complaining now because they secretly want to be blowing it in our faces?
3 people like this
20 responses
@Perry123 (363)
•
7 Apr 08
bluemars you are exagrating what we have said.
We have not said smoking is good for you...though it does appear to be good for you in SOME ways. What we have said is that the VAST majority of evidence is bad science.
Smoking iS linked to SOME diseases but the risks have been exagerated. And while smokers for example do have a slightly higher chance of getting certain disases, there are FAR more important other factors involved.
If in the last fifty years we had not spnding millions on trying to prove smoking was th dfinitiv cause of most disas, the money could have been spent finding the true causes and finding cures.
two diseases now KNOWN to have statistical correlation with smoking, but now proven to be not the cause, are stomach ulcers/cancr and cervical cancer. So th mdical scince world wer prov wrong on those...and we ar going to se it with lung cancer too. Pollution from diesel, coal dust asbestos etc ; genetic disposition, and viruses are the causes...smoking may bring it on a bit quicker with some or all those other factors present...as it may do in cervical cancer too. howeevr...eliminate hpv virus and NO AMOUNT of smoking can cause it.
now they KNOW that why do you think they are hysterically trying to wipe it out? Because if they do not make very effort, a health authority is going to get its butt sued by a smoker with cervical cancer for lying to her.
So we are not saying smoking is completely innocent of causing disase. we are actually saying that ...if we use th crime analogy....that smoking may be a petty thief, and by blaming it and trying to fix it up with every other crime in the area, medical science is actually letting the real culprits continue their spree of rape and murder.
This is NOT rubbish...ignore it at your peril.
@bluemars (952)
• Australia
7 Apr 08
No one is blaming you for anything but it is sad that you believe that and you think you are being targeted because employees and workers deserve to work in a healthy and comfortable environment. It seems you are the one who has tunnel vision in only looking at the smokers benefit side of things. That is the selfishness wish of every smoker who wants what you want because they simply don't care about the effects of it whether it be on others or even themselves. This discussion is about smoking if you want to compare it to the environment or other stuff then you should start a discussion of comparison. We are discussing only smoking in all its effects. The two are not to be compared because one is a simple choice you made years ago and are just too afraid to give up and that is why your biased opinion will is not going to brainwash everyone else who knows the truth already.
@bluemars (952)
• Australia
8 Apr 08
Yes I see your point and am sorry that you have been discriminated against but aside from that the topic of discussion is mainly that some people are saying smoking effects no one and smokers can go about there business in this world and don't really care about health effects or how it can effect others and that is the main reason for bans within enclosed areas. Those bans are not to say anything but management and employers acting on the behalf of its workers and patrons in regards to their health and safety and that my dear friend is far more important than what a smoker thinks of these new laws and how much of an inconvenience it is for them to step out and come back in every time they need a drag. I am very happy to know that some smokers are not that inconsiderate and those are the ones that can admit truths to people and are not offended by anyone because of their desire, their habit, their own addiction. They accept how it effects people and simply make the necessary adjustments whilst still being able to enjoy their habit.
@bluemars (952)
• Australia
13 Apr 08
Yes we know that already about the fact that we are all going to go at some point one way or another. However as you have mentioned our race is learning and getting better everyday with the research aspect of things and it is enabling us to make better decisions about our lives so that we are taking life like a gift, living it to the full and not limiting it in a way that will not be enjoyed later in life!
@Darkwing (21583)
•
7 Apr 08
No, on the contrary... the non-smokers are complaining because the smokers keep opening the doors to go out of the pubs and as a result they get cold. Smokers will never win, so why complain about the bans?
I'd just like to point out to you that according to a report released last week, if you use a mobile phone, you are in far more danger than the person who smokes. So do you own a mobile phone, and will you be banned from taking it in the pub? No, of course you won't.
Live and let live! That's my motto.
@bluemars (952)
• Australia
7 Apr 08
It is the smokers that feel the cold when they leave not the non smokers, they have no need to complain and I have never seen anyone complain about the cleaner air they enjoy breathing in club or pub, including the fact that they get to go home and not stink of smoke. You are correct on one note, that smokers will never win because smoking is a losing game and a gamble with your health and life. As for the phones you mentioned and can not be compared the effects of smoking and the annoyance of it all, especially when you get "accidently" burned by a smoker in a pub or club. Only a non smoker seems to know the feeling of that burn. I wish I could hold a torch of fire when I go out to town too, then it would make it fair for all especially if you were forced to smell the smoke and inhale all of its fumes that is.
@Darkwing (21583)
•
7 Apr 08
I'm not going to waste my time arguing with you, my friend. You believe what you want to believe, or are brainwashed into believing. You'll find, by reading through the rest of your responses and checking out some of the links provided, that you are way off the mark with what you say. That is, if you can open your mind and take the trouble to check it out.
I've said my piece further on, so with that off my chest, I will leave this discussion to continue. I'm tired of all the arguments with people who have tunnel vision.
Brightest Blessings and peace to you, my friend.
2 people like this
@Perry123 (363)
•
7 Apr 08
like a few smokers against the government Yeah like we can really brainwash people.
mot of the links I have given you are analysis of the governments propaganda and health and scientific evidence. not propaganda itself.
And if you actually read it you would realise that hte evidence does not hold up to any serious analysis. Scientifiacally spaking, ife a hypothsesis its true it should tand up to testing and it does not
Also, the stas don'te ven indicate anything other than a small correlation which is not a truth.
Smoking causes fatal lung cancer is a lie.
It doesnt take a genius to work that out.
If it were true then virtually 100% of smokers would get lung cancer and they do not. Only 3 to 9 out of every 100 smokers get it, and mostly in old age.
that isnt propaganda it is fact.
it is also fact that no animal forced to smoke ver devloped lung cancer. Again you have offered no explanation of this.
all you hvae given is heresay apart from the list of chemicals...which is no indication of toxicity.all tests that have analysed the blood of non smokers in pubs and clubs after lengthy exposure have shown neglibible or zero traces of those chemicals in the body. Again...that is not propaganda its fact.
As is the fact that stomach and cervical cancers, which showed the same correlation as smoking and lung cancers, are now PROVEN to be caused by virus and bacteria. Both have been removed from the AMA lies of smoking related disease without any apology to the millions who were told they developed them because they smoked.
and the benficial effects of nicotine? I have referred you to medical and science sites .
So there ya go. Propaganda is ususally said to be such if its a lie. There's a whole buch of lies there exposed.
propaganda you have swallowed hook line and sinker without questioning. We have shown you have put your faith in people who have leid to you.
1 person likes this
@lovespecialangel (3632)
• United States
10 Apr 08
Bluemars, not all smokers are complaining. I am a smoker and never once have I said that smoking is good for you or your health. Fact is smoking is just as bad as eating red meat or breathing in polluted air, which we all do. The smokers that are complaining aren't doing it because they want to blow smoke in your face. They are complaining because our rights as smokers are being taken from us. We are being told where we can or can't smoke. So far the only smoking ban where I live is that we can't smoke inside public places like resturuants. I don't have a problem with that myself. I just go outside to smoke. I have heard of bans where you can't smoke inside your own vehicle, which is one ban I will never comply with. I bought my car and it's my personal property, therefore I will smoke in it if I want. But for you to say that all smokers are bad and that we "just want to blow it in your faces" is wrong.
2 people like this
@bluemars (952)
• Australia
10 Apr 08
You read wrong because I did not say that ALL smokers want to blow it in our faces. Anyway that was if you read it right was not even a statement but question to those that are against the enclosed areas bans to which you don't have a problem with anyway. Why do some responders (mostly smoking ones) take what I have said out of context? Now this is a question and not a statement so don't come back with you think we are liars and this and that. If they wanted to ban smoking all together they could but they have not so why some people are acting like it is a real threat to them and their addiction, I have no idea. You can still smoke when you like even if you have to be considerate sometimes, you are still able to do it regardless. No one is taking anything from smokers that they have not already taken from themselves.
@bluemars (952)
• Australia
10 Apr 08
Perry what can you mean? Did you just wake up or something? Seriously your typos are getting out of hand. Have a coffee mate, I just made some iced coffee, would you like some? Actually it is more like a frappaciono, now if you would like to smoke we would sit outside on the balcony and I can enjoy the fresh air and the coffee with you. Why are you not allowed to smoke in your own place, is it shared accomodation? I own my own home so I guess if I was a smoker I could smoke inside but I wouldn't want to stain the walls so I would smoke on the balcony, I don't see anything wrong in keeping your home nice. Lighten up dude things can't be that bad. :)
@Perry123 (363)
•
10 Apr 08
aye lovespcial....s'all I am saying but can see if we dont kick back now were buggered.
see i cant smoke in me own place I spend a fortune keping open....and i don't want bluemars custom he can sod off but now i have to have him looking about spending sod all money.
so its alrady com in my own proprty which sucks.
1 person likes this
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
9 Apr 08
The science has already shown that smoking or even second hand smoke is not nearly as dangerous as the anti smoking Nazis have tried to say.
There is evidence that suggests that in some aspects it IS good for you.
You have already been blinded by the junk science and propaganda that the anti smoking lobby has been dishing out by the bucket loads.
There is a thing called truth, and the anti smoking lobby and anti smoking individuals such as yourself do not want the truth to be known.
I'm am glad it makes you laugh, and I hope that you are still laughing when the same tyrannical people decide that things you enjoy are now bad for you and seek to ban them due to healthy lifestyle concerns.
Let's see how funny you think it is then.
Junk food is already a target, as are overweight people... and these groups are setting their sights on other things as well.
Sooner or later they will get around to you, so you go ahead and keep laughing.
Of course we are afraid of the news laws and bans, who wouldn't be? These laws are trying to legislate personal choice and infringe upon my personal rights and freedoms in an unconstitutional manner.
These are the same type of laws that Nazi Germany passed prior to destroying everyones liberty there, and if you think that can't happen here you better think again because it has already begun.
You say we still go out to have our habit, yet now they are trying to make smoking in public illegal, or ban smoking within so many feet of doorways or buildings.
There is no satisfying people like you, and you won't be happy until our rights are gone completely.
We are complaining because we are being discriminated against for no good reason.
The second hand smoke is proven to be nothing more than fabrication, and there are things much more hazardous than that is.
You're just upset because the science is finally being used to bring out the truth, and people like you don't want the truth to be known... therefore you start discussions such as this one to try and convince people that the truth is fiction, because you can't face up to the truth.
1 person likes this
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
9 Apr 08
You just don't "get it" do you?
people want to ban smoking altogether, because they want to control what other people do, and they can't stand it when the science PROVES them to be wrong.
Why should I respect others, when other don't respect me?
What kind of sick twisted world do you live in anyway?
What's the matter, don't you have enough sense to stay away from people who smoke if it bothers you so?
1 person likes this
@bluemars (952)
• Australia
10 Apr 08
You know so much about the hilter story, are you sure your not the one obbessed with the whole nazi thing? I am really beginning to be concerned for you. What is this obsession and how did it begin? You guys are starting to make me laugh though when you make that comparison. So every non smoker is a nazi now? LOL I think you should listen to your own advice about extreme fascism remarks. Those none smoking individuals you speak of are people like yourself too.
@bluemars (952)
• Australia
9 Apr 08
People like you are the ones who want to believe that in fact smoking causes no harm and has no possible health effects, if that is what you wish to believe that is fine with me. If you can handle smoke being blown into your face constantly and enjoy it then ask a friend to do that for you. However not everyone is like you, you should respect others if not your own body. That is all people in general want, they don't care if you smoke, they don't care what you do, they just don't want to be effected by it.
@keyers (159)
• United States
7 Apr 08
I am a smoker and know all the risks and I am for the bans.I have to young kids and I don't smoke in the huse or car or anywhere around them.I don't want ther smokers affecting my children and thats why I am for the bans.I never heard that smoking could be good for I would like to hear more about that.I wouldn't believe it but it still sparks my intrest.
2 people like this
@emeraldisle (13139)
• United States
7 Apr 08
You might want to check out this link: http://www.forces.org/evidence/evid/therap.htm It has links to many studies which show that smoking can have benefits. Up to you what you want to make of it.
1 person likes this
@bluemars (952)
• Australia
8 Apr 08
Well wouldn't that be so convenient for smoker if all of a sudden smoking was the cure of all these diseases and cancers and irritation in our lungs. Yes if we lived in a perfect smokers world then I can see how all these so called claims about it could be true. However reality has the last laugh and has the hardest hit. You walk in your own path and do what you think is right for yourself and your health, others can divert but consequences are bound to follow either way.
@Esoteric1 (863)
• Canada
7 Apr 08
well I am a smoker and I know it damages me and my health, I certainly wouldn't tell anyone smoking is good for you. I am also not afraid of any laws regarding smoking I actually agree with them.
2 people like this
@Perry123 (363)
•
7 Apr 08
You have been grossly misinformed.
start here:
http://www.forces.org/evidence/index.htm
any law banning smoking is a gross step towards authoritarian governmnt exactly the same as it was under the nazis. they banned smoking and foxhunting...sound familiar? both purly out of prjudic and with the most dire false evidnce...the same used today. And that gave them the basis to take their evil conrol into every aspect of the life of the individual ...health and morlity are the starting points....and we all know where that led.
Second hand smoking is safer than second hand fascism.
2 people like this
@Perry123 (363)
•
7 Apr 08
here is the world health organisations repressed report:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlContent.jhtml?html=/archive/1998/03/08/wtob08.html
So why have tehy ignored their own evidence and exagerated the risks?
There are no WMDs ..sound familiar?
the House Of lords report also was fiercely critical of the governments use of false evidence on getting smoking in public places inside banned and considered it a gross and dangerous infringement on the rights of the individual .
2 people like this
@Esoteric1 (863)
• Canada
7 Apr 08
lol dude nazi nwo 1 world government blah blah ur preaching to the choir, im not talking about dissarming the populous im not talking about problem reaction solution, smoking is bad for people I choose to smoke that is my right and i wont give it up, but that shouldn't mean that my smoking should be allowed to affect others or thier well being .. think about it :P
2 people like this
@StrawberryKisses (2833)
• Canada
8 Apr 08
WOW this really has stirred up a commotion in here.
Firstly I will say I believe that yes it does effect non-smokers. Now with that said, I have seen alot of the comments here and it seems as though you believe that non-smokers are better than smokers. How is that right in anyway? We are targeted because we smoke and we are being made to look like we are outcasts, now how is that fair?
Non-smokers think that they should have the clean air and yes you are entitled to it, you want it? then go somewhere that doesn't allow smoking. We smokers would not have such a hard time with the bans if the non-smokers would stop pushing for us to be isolated. We can no longer smoker anywhere near a public door, we are being put out in the cold because of a habit. So how about we put a ban on one of your addictions? it's basically the same thing.
If we want to smoke it's our life we are allowed. If you don't then go where it won't bother you. Plaina nd simple.
1 person likes this
@bluemars (952)
• Australia
8 Apr 08
I bet you would not have a problem with junkie shooting up in front of your kids, oh he just has a habit and can not be helped, jesus I would not want to be your child. If you want to be a smoker or have any habit that will effect others you have to take responsibility for it. I know the easier option is the lazy one where you want others to just move be that a smoker or not. It is not a big deal if you have this habit and you want it so bad but you need to be considerate and own your decisions in life, that is the adult thing to do but many smokers just want to do what they want and simply have no care of the health and well being of others, you may be different but that is shown in your considerate nature to others and would be left to be seen.
@bluemars (952)
• Australia
9 Apr 08
I think you are the one who has not read your first response and any of the previous comments made by me in this whole discussion so you are so off base about what I really mean and I don't think you are the one who has a clue because you haven't bothered to read through the whole discussion and the points being discussed. I never thought anyone was better than anyone, you are putting words in my mouth. Give me a break I would never do that, your saying this because you don't want to hear what I am really saying and you keep comparing smoking which is an addiction and has health effects on others to nail biting? Tell me this does nail biting effect you physically when someone else does it. Perhaps you may find it disgusting but it is not a major health risk to others, that is why I agree with the bans and it has nothing to do with anything I am saying. If you want to discuss disgusting habits like that that have no effects in terms health risks then maybe you should start a discussion on that, this discussion is only about the health effects of smoking. Go back and read the topic again and you will understand more especially if you read the responses.
@p3halliwel2005 (3156)
• Philippines
8 Apr 08
Smokers really don't want to know that smoking is really bad for their health they don't want to accept it because they can't help themselves to quit. Their ears are closed to the health risk people tell them about smoking..Someday they will realize when it is too late and then they will say I should have listened.
@bluemars (952)
• Australia
8 Apr 08
The truth is p3 that they simply just don't care either way, that is fine with me just don't annoy me with it because I want to breath clean air. If their ears want to remain closed because it is too hard for them to be successful in quitting then that is their own downfall and their problem even if they feel nothing now or are in good shape now. It would be very good for them to hear about it like it was some kind of cure or miracle thing that makes you stronger somehow, let them believe that if that is what makes them feel better and sleep well at night. It does not matter for some smokers their addiction is stronger than any conviction put to them and so they will defend their habit until life or it takes them.
@surverymom (471)
• United States
7 Apr 08
I am a smoker, and yes I do know that it is bad for my health. But we are all going to die someway or another. My great grandfater lived to be 101 years old and he smoked from the age of 11. Never had a trace of lung cancer or anything healthwise other than old age. So it does not affect everyone. I do not think that people should smoke, I think that it is nasty, and I can see where you are coming from because I see everything from both sides of the matter that is in discussion. I have been burnt like you said in the post, and I was soooooooo mad. So, even as a smoker I do know how you feel. As for the rest of your post, I really do not understand it.
1 person likes this
@bluemars (952)
• Australia
8 Apr 08
Perhaps because you did not really read it properly but that is okay I know most people here are in a rush to just answer and move on to the next discussion. That is okay because we all have lives outside of discussion time. That is funny though but yes your great grandfather was lucky to say the least but unfortunately many and I mean many people are not so lucky with their habit and I do understand that some are more abusive with their health than others and that may play a huge role in it too. I am very grateful for those considerate smokers who do care enough to accommodate for the health and comfort of others and safety as I mentioned before with the whole burning thing.
@Hatley (163776)
• Garden Grove, California
7 Apr 08
I agree with you that a lot of that stuff we have been crammed down our throats with is rubbish. Ijust want to see smokers get a place to smoke that will satisfy them so they will just shut up and not pollute the air we have to breathe. they are making a stupid war out of this and I am beginning to think that the nicotine they so praise is warping their brains some way. If they want to smoke just fine, just do not make me breathe the stuff that they also use to kill bugs on fruit trees. If it kills bugs how can it be all that great for humans?
1 person likes this
@bluemars (952)
• Australia
8 Apr 08
Yes hatley this is my main point exactly. I think you are right also about the whole warping their brains in some way too. I mean just give people a break and let them breathe because that is all they want and don't really care about the habit that has bewitched them and made them so defensive about everything. Just be considerate of others and smoke to your hearts desire or until it gives up or at least your lungs will eventually.
@nice030481 (1109)
• Philippines
8 Apr 08
smoking? even you don t smoke, but many of your neighbor or friends smoke besides you, you will be affected by this. it is bad for our helth, and it should not be done in public area.
@bluemars (952)
• Australia
8 Apr 08
That is also one of my main points is that it does effect people whether a smoker wants to admit this or not even if it is not killing us or your friends and families, it still effects people. I am glad to hear some smokers admitting to us that yes they do care and are considerate enough to take responsibility for their own habit.
@bluemars (952)
• Australia
8 Apr 08
Before the bans came through for enclosed areas, tess I wish it would have been that simple, no one could really escape the smoke it was everywhere, in fact you took the stench with you when you left too. I mean even my mother would ask have you been smoking? I would be like no mom I went out to a club is all. So now it is more better because it does feel like the problem is being solved in certain situations like the one I explained. Very good news indeed.
@bluemars (952)
• Australia
14 Apr 08
So many people who do not smoke will agree with you and even some smokers have their limits when it comes to second hand smoke too. I have heard even some smokers complain about the stench of it at times. So it even effects their world too even if they are addicted to it, that says a lot about it and yes I agree it is unfair on both accounts.
@bluemars (952)
• Australia
15 Apr 08
Throwing you out on the street? No one is doing such a thing to you, you poor thing I can not believe how much of a girl you are being about all of this. Seriously man no one throws you out, you leave for a tic and come back in. That is not thrown out! You keep victimizing yourself about it, when you can still enjoy one whenever you want without effecting others.
@Bethygrl (92)
• United States
16 Apr 08
Geez, what is your major malfunction? If you hate smoking so bad, then just stay out of places that have it. I think this stress your putting on yourself is very unhealthy. Maybe you should focus your anger on somthing like kids being abused or murderers on the loose. Seriously, just stay out of places that have smoke, that is your right. And hopefully us smokers will stay the heck out of any area you are in. You got some issues man.
1 person likes this
@Perry123 (363)
•
17 Apr 08
we have been banned from smoking in any public place, in certain US states they are talking bout putting children of mokrs into car, and even bnning it in our own homes or the street. Where would you like for us to draw the line Blumars? It is TIME for us to get angry NOW. In fact we have been very coniderate and haven't broken the law in our million and all we are asking for is our own places.
I promise you if the anti smoking lobby don't listen to our case you are going to see real anger.
1 person likes this
@atifshahzad1 (632)
• Pakistan
7 Apr 08
yes i also agree with u and i have heard that at the one side of smoke is flame and at the other end is a foolish man or woman.
@sahyd2don (2942)
• India
7 Apr 08
I dont smoke but few of my friends have habit of smoking...they somke when i am with them ...i dont like the smell of smoke but cant say anything to them....
@bluemars (952)
• Australia
7 Apr 08
If they cared they would move away from you or go outside to smoke but in their defense they should be known to the fact that you feel uncomfortable or that it may effect your breathing. So you should say something and if they are real friends they will make an effort when you are around, if they don't then they care more for themselves and their habit.
@sassysammy81 (369)
• United States
7 Apr 08
For one smokers know that it is bad for them,and it seems all you wanna do is complain about something,I thought this was FREE country,but would have to say no it isn't ,because people go drinking and they have to smell smoke or have to be around it and start complaining,if you don't like it leave that simpe and if you don't wanna leave deal with it,but NO all people wanna do is complain just like your doing now.
I am afraid of no law or ban,so what if I can't smoke somewhere I will just go somewhere I can, that simple,see simpicity what a concept people make a bigger deal outta stuff than need be.
@bluemars (952)
• Australia
8 Apr 08
You are not following this discussion very well and probably have not read it at all. You see there is no big deal about anything we are simply just talking about how yes it effects people and health but some people wish to impose and preach about things to make smoking a some sort of cure and having no effect on health. Well to that my friend is if you read the topic of discussion is the reason and the matter we are looking at.
@graceandowen (1637)
•
7 Apr 08
I have never once said smoking is good for any1, i am a smoker myself and i don't smoke around people who do not smoke. there are no health benefits to smoking that is true, but I CHOOSE to smoke and that is my decision and i do not want to be judged for it.
1 person likes this
@bluemars (952)
• Australia
8 Apr 08
I am not judging smokers, it is their decision like you said and of course if they want to do it and get addicted to it, it is their choice at the end of the day and no one else's. After all if they fall sick from it, they have no one else to blame for their decisions because we all have to own our decision. No one can deny that but I am so happy to hear you are a considerate smoker who cares about the well being of others and you don't smoke around others who do not smoke. That is a very nice thing you do and that is my whole point in this discussion that smokers have to accept the effects on others and do their part in being considerate because that person or even if it was someone's child did not choose for you to become a smoker in the first place, that was why smokers need to own their decisions and their responisblities where others are concerned. After all it is their own habit.
@wittyakanksha (436)
• India
7 Apr 08
of course not.more than it affects the person who smoke its also detrimental to the health of the person who smokes indirectly that is passive smoking.I hate the idea when people smoke in public places and more often than not they will simply the smoke right on your face without realising it that we are being affected by this non responsible behaviour of theirs!!!
@bluemars (952)
• Australia
8 Apr 08
Yes I agree that people should open their eyes and be more curtious of others. I mean I expect it of others when I am driving because they expect it of me too, they want it just as bad as we do but make excuses for themselves because it is a habit and they don't want to inconvenience themselves but happy to inconvenience others in the process. Sometimes I wonder how can a smoker help you when seriously they are unable to help themselves but do so for their own want and desire. It makes me wonder how much they really care about any detriment to others.