Homosexual Agenda

United States
April 12, 2008 2:13am CST
I. DESENSITIZATION If, however, gays can live alongside straights, visibly but as inoffensively as possible, they will arouse a low-grade alert only, which, though annoying to straights, will eventually diminish for purely physiological reasons. Straights will be desensitized. We can extract the following principle for our campaign to desensitize straights to gays and gayness, inundate them in a continuous flood of gay-related advertising, presented in the least offensive fashion possible. If straights can't shut off the shower, they may at least eventually get used to being wet. 2. JAMMING The trick is to get the bigot into the position of feeling a conflicting twinge of shame, along with his reward, whenever his homohatred surfaces, so that his reward will be diluted or spoiled. This can be accomplished in a variety of ways, all making use of repeated exposure to pictorial images or verbal statements that are incompatible with his self-image as a well-liked person, one who fits in with the rest of the crowd. Thus, propagandistic advertisement can depict homophobic and homohating bigots as crude loudmouths and a$$holes--people who say not only 'f*ggot' but 'n*gger,' 'k*ke,' and other shameful epithets--who are 'not Christian. It can, in short, link homohating bigotry with all sorts of attributes the bigot would be ashamed to possess, and with social consequences he would find unpleasant and scary. When he sees someone like himself being disapproved of and disliked by ordinary Joes, Direct Emotional Modeling ensures that he will feel just what they feel --and transfer it to himself. Note that the bigot need not actually be made to believe that he is such a heinous creature, that others will now despise him, and that he has been the immoral agent of suffering. It would be impossible to make him believe any such thing. Rather, our effect is achieved without reference to facts, logic, or proof. 3.CONVERSION It isn't enough that antigay bigots should become confused about us, or even indifferent to us--we are safest, in the long run, if we can actually make them like us. Conversion aims at just this. We mean conversion of the average American's emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media. In Conversion, the bigot, who holds a very negative stereotypic picture, is repeatedly exposed to literal picture/label pairs, in magazines, and on billboards and TV, of gay- explicitly labeled as such!--who not only don't look like his picture of a homosexual, but are carefully selected to look either like the bigot and his friends, or like any one of his other stereotypes of all-right guys-- the kind of people he already likes and ` admires. This image must, of necessity, be carefully tailored to be free of absolutely every element of the widely held stereotypes of how 'f*ggots' look, dress, and sound. He--or she--must not be too well or fashionably dressed; must not be too handsome--that is, mustn't look like a model--or well groomed. The image must be that of an icon of normality But it makes no difference that the ads are lies These modes are abstract--we've only hinted, here and there, at how they can be harnessed and put to work for us in a practical propaganda campaign . . . ------ Okay, these excerpts are from a book called "After the Ball". A book that the religious right guys (Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, ect.) use on their websites and that they use when meeting with politicians. This book is making fun of men like them. It is nothing but a parody. So how in the world can people actually take the stuff in this book seriously?! Seriously, some people need to research these things for themselves instead of listening to other people who have no idea what they are talking about. Honestly, people need to get more common sense.
1 person likes this
1 response
@reene0225 (351)
• United States
16 Apr 08
That is kind of confusing, but that's easy to do with me. lol I'm also kind of tired. But it sounds like it is a book written by a stereotyper. People that are against gays. Personally I have no problem with gay people. You love who you love no matter what gender or race they may be. Sounds like they are trying to brainwash people. Seems like they're doing a good job because they keep using the same method and it seems it has worked. People are just so brainwashed by people they might admire or see as superior.
• United States
17 Apr 08
Oh I think the book was written to help homosexuals gain equal rights or something. The only thing is, they were also making fun of the people who are hate-mongers and homophobes at the same time. The politicians and right-wing people use this book saying that it is a handbook for gay people or something. The funny thing is, most gay people have never heard of this book before, so how could it be a gay handbook if the gays never heard of it before?
1 person likes this
• United States
25 Apr 08
Because the politicians are keeping it secret. lol but I do understand better now. Thanks