The Myth of the All Important "Working Class"...
By ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
April 14, 2008 3:21pm CST
Those of you who read my posts know the distain I have for political policies based on class warfare. To me, class warfare is just another form of bigotry. Why? Because, like all other forms of bigotry, it is based on preconceived notions about groups of people.
One of the myths of class warfare is how important the workers are to a society. "Labor makes America Work"... bah!
If you work the production line, you aren't any more important than anyone else. If the marketing department doesn't do their job, the widgets you are making aren't going anywhere. If the HR people aren't doing their job then you'll be working alone and can't keep up.
If the financial officers aren't doing their jobs then you'll all be out jobs before long.
Labor likes to complain about how "unfair" it is that they could lose their jobs if the executives make poor decisions. They complain, but then they defend their own poor decisions.
A union will call a strike to get what they want. How would those workers react if the executives went on strike? If "labor makes America work" then it wouldn't matter what kind of decisions the executives make.
There are truckers who think their job is the most important job in the country. Yeah, it is imporant, but no more important than the lumper who fills the container. No more important than the advertizing department that gives them a reason to move the product in the first place.
We have our "hero" jobs. Military, Firefighters, EMTs, Nurses, Doctors, Emergency Managers and others. Those of you who know me, know I have a soft spot for these people. But how effective would any of them be if the fire chiefs, generals, and other "suits" didn't get the job done? How heroic is the paramedic with an empty jump bag?
Workers of the world, get over yourself! Your job is very important! But not any more or less important than everyone else in the chain of supply you happen to work in.
2 people like this
5 responses
@WhatsHerName (2716)
• United States
15 Apr 08
I have had a lot of jobs and this is the most common problem I have seen. Everyone thinks they have the hardest job, it's the most important and it's dog eat dog. People don't seem know how to or want to work together most of the time. They don't seem to understand that if they work hard their boss or owner does better, thus everyone could make more money.
I constantly see people who resent management just because they are management.
I think unions have served and abused their purpose in this country. We have OCEA now, they seem to be very on top of things at least in the factories I have worked in.
Now it seems as if Unions are asking too much from the employers at times, thus one of the reasons a lot of our great jobs are now being done by overworked, underpaid women and children in China.
Now we blame the government for losing our jobs and expect them to get them back.
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
15 Apr 08
True, unions have both served a purpose and been part of the problem. So has managment. I'm not anti union as much as I am pro individual.
I would rather be free to negotiate for myself than pay someone to do it for me. If someone else would rather pay someone else to do it, that's fine too.
When we start thinking that our role in the whole thing is the only really important role, we fool ourselves and cost jobs.
@Perry123 (363)
•
15 Apr 08
in the UK there is the same class war mentality.
when foxhunting was banned, and undeniable and overwhelming evidence was given that it was not cruel, many Labour Party mps ignored it and voted for a ban becaue they said it was revenge for the miner's strike.
Ridiculous further becuase in Wales many miners hunt.
The worst thing is, the MPs and party who purport to represent the working class are in fact middle class and usually from private schools education. Worse still, is that they spnd fortuns of taxpayr mony on an inadquae ducation system yet continue to send their own children to private schools.
My mother was miners daughter but fashion model and she always used to say that the socialists always try to keep the working class down...and I think it true.
But there IS a definite cultural difference with class.
Though there is much more social mobility (though the current socialists have virtually stopped this over 12 years)then here used to be say 100 years ago, that was and never was the real important factor; at least in the UK.
The working class culture is diffrent...and ironically, very similar to upper class culture. The common values are shared...and they tend to be hednistic...thrill seeking, sporting, dressing up, fast cars, horse racing, gambling smoking drinking, partying etc.
Th middl class however; are the ones who use the working classes to take power themselves. They do the sams with animals.
Generally in the UK you get animal rights and left wingers in the middl class urban culture...who control things; and forc thier morality on others. So just like in nazi germany and communist russia it was the narrow minded petit bourgeois who forced their narrow value system complete with bigotry on others; so it is today in the UK.
So foxhunting and smoking is now banned, smoking and gas guzzling cars taxed but this has hurt the working class hard. They have also had their aspirations lowered by an udctaion system that has deferred gratification at itsheart...impossble for any working class culture to adapt to.
So there is such a thing as social classes...and it is a shame that the cultural values of working and upper clases are not respcted a bit more. And certainly middle class Socialists claiming to be represnting the working class are usually just out to further their own moral agendas line their pockets and further their prejudices in Law.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
15 Apr 08
First you say it's a question of class, then you say it isn't.
Personally, I don't think smoking, hunting or driving has guzzlers should be banned. But then again, while my ancestors were British, I'm not.
@Perry123 (363)
•
15 Apr 08
no...there is class but its a cultural thing not a economic thing. I was merely pointing out that a working class person on average can earn more than say than a farmer of upper class background. And aslo that neither the working class or upper class are bothered about forcing their morality on othrs like the middle class socialists seem to be.
Labour would be kind of similar to your democrats is guess...lots of laws about social justice which end up actually making it harder for the working class to achieve for example.
I agree with the premise above; just suggesting how it is that the UK differs somwhat because we had a class system years ago. And that the working class and upper class always had a cultural bond....always providing the soldiers for example even to this day. So class doesn't carry a kind of snobbery or economic thing...except ironically the middle class who resent the fact that they weren't born into gentry; and look down on the working class for their "common" hedonistic values. However the real landed gentry have no snobbery about them.
@Perry123 (363)
•
15 Apr 08
yes....but that has also been severely restricted. bu I was talking about hunting with hounds.
It costs between a tenner and £40 to ride out with a Hunt so it isn't a question of money. Costs around £30 a week to keep a horse on diy. So as the average wage here for the working class is around £500 a week its hardly prohibitive.
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
18 Apr 08
Instead of politician fighting for America's working class, what about America's taxpayers class. CEO's work, I am in management and I work, but no one would ever say I am a worker. Yes those evil managers that everyone hates except when I sign their checks. How many jobs have those politician that represent the working class created? How many jobs have those evil capitalist created. If you want more worker you need more capitalist. More business owner, more workers, I do not see politician anywhere in that statement. Everyone complains when a CEO makes millions of dollars a year, but would you put up with all of the stress that being responsible for a multi-billion dollar company, and more employes than the Army, for 10 dollars a hour. The reason they make a million dollars is because they are worth a million dollars.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
18 Apr 08
Hmm, when I was a SPC in the Army, I was responsible for hundreds of lives every day, and millions of dollars worth of equipment... all for less than $10/hr... (I was a parachute rigger).
Where did I go wrong!! LOL
1 person likes this
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
14 Apr 08
Well, the working class don't count for much if the evil rich business owners were not a part of the equation, because without them there would be NO working class.
I actually have very little use for unions, because they tend to create a lot more problems then they are worth, both to the workers they supposedly represent and to the businesses.
Everyone has their place in business, and if one part doesn't do it's job then the entire business is hurt.
All the workers represent is just one part of the complete picture.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
14 Apr 08
Exactly! So how is "labor" somehow more noble, important or deserving of our respect?
@tatzkie (644)
• Philippines
15 Apr 08
you have nice points. and i think it all depends on where your bias is. i myself dont like labels and the bigotry. but i dont think humans can just detach itself from its basic class consciousness. but i agree, with the thought that in this post-post modern era of sociological thinking... concept of class and supremacy are not so suitable. just my opinion though.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
15 Apr 08
I have no problem with the concept of class, but yeah, class supremacy is the problem.