Quality content = Long ?

Singapore
April 20, 2008 2:44am CST
Well do you think quality content = long text ? sometimes i do think that a short and sweet answer with lots of meaning here makes the respond more quality isn't it ? What is your comment on this issue ?
3 people like this
8 responses
@bamby1983 (286)
• India
20 Apr 08
I think quality content is content that contains all the required information in the shortest and most easily understandable form. The answer needs to be long enough to be explicit, yet short enough to convey the desired message in the smallest amount of time. Think of it as drafting a formal letter for a busy CEO of a company.
1 person likes this
• Singapore
20 Apr 08
Well that a good question , you remind me of a course i had attended before , the question if you are a busy CEO will you read a formal letter with 2 full pages in it . i doubt so yea . The best way to present your short content will be with the aid of visual stuff which i think people here are lacking yea.
• India
20 Apr 08
Yeah, visual aids are pretty helpful! For example, when I'm learning to use a new software, a series of screenshots with the appropriate steps circled in red are a lot more helpful than a 1000 page e-book on the same. A picture could speak more than a thousand words. More importantly, the picture says it faster!
1 person likes this
@98765m (1017)
• India
20 Apr 08
Well,as far as I know,to earn more in mylot both quality and quantity of the posts is important. One can't tell which is more important. So,just respond to a discussion by telling your opinion in atleast in 4-5 lines. So,try to pay attention to both quality and quantity. Cheers ! Have a nice day Happy mylotting and happy earning
1 person likes this
@stephcjh (38473)
• United States
20 Apr 08
I think quality consist of alot of meaning also that relates to the subject. It really does not have to be super long. That could get boring. I think that a clear and to the point response is much better. I have seen both of the sides here and I prefer the short ans sweet responses. They have higher quality, to me.
1 person likes this
• Indonesia
21 Apr 08
I don't think so. Sometimes some long contents are even consisted of useless words usage, which don't really explain what the text is talking about. What I got so far about quality content would be that it would be not too short, but it would be simple enough to digest, and people would get the point right away as they read the text. And most of all, the content gives some good contribution towards the readers.
@paid2write (5201)
21 Apr 08
Long text does not always mean good quality, and in some discussions it is possible to respond with a short answer. I think a good discussion is one where you need to write about your personal experience, or to give your own opinion. It is not enough just to say you agree or disagree with a topic, you need to explain why. I enjoy reading other people's views and life experiences and I think these are the responses with the best quality content.
@javaleira (372)
• Portugal
20 Apr 08
im sure if you do a comment as long as i going to do and u provide usefull information u get the most money (1cent) lool so i think im getting bored of comenting and that and im looking for all the methods to make cash quikly...
1 person likes this
@wasim989 (2298)
• India
21 Apr 08
No I don't think that quality discussions has to be long text. Quality discussion is replying honestly and not just replying it carelessly just to make money.
@lifeplayer (1007)
• Malaysia
21 Apr 08
I believed that nobody will like to spend long time to read an article which have the same key point as another article which only spend you a minute. Time is important resourse, clean and key point is important. That;s why everybody is talking about the keyword.