Which of the two versions of the "Willy Wonka" do you like better?

Philippines
April 28, 2008 9:29pm CST
Have you read the book "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory"? Or just watched the film? Anyway, which film version of the children's book "Charlie and the Chocolate factory" do you like better? (1) The 1971 version with Gene Wilder as Willy Wonka or (2) The 2005 film "Charlie and the Chocolate factory" by Johnny Depp?
2 people like this
8 responses
• United States
29 Apr 08
I prefer the 1971 version. The 2005 film just messed things up too much. they gave Charlie a Dad and the grandparents were not in bed. That was kinda a basic fact that explained Charlie's poverty. Plus, I had to change the chanel after Willie Wonka set the clock figures on fire. Willie Wonka is eccentric, not sick. In the book he is just weird. I actually prefer the 1971 movie over the book. Roald Dahl was just a very strange man.
2 people like this
• United States
10 Jun 09
Ah, yes, but it was the book that HAD Mr. Bucket alive to begin with. And Mr. Wonka did NOT set his factory "It's a Small World After All" figures on fire; they just malfunctioned and went up in flame. I personally thought that was hilarious, BTW. But I do like Gene Wilder's WW better than Johnny Depp's. Mr. Depp's Willy seemed to be neurotic and/or somewhat psychoctic - sort of like Jim Carrey.
@jer31558 (3683)
• United States
13 May 08
I think the old one, usually when a remake is done they leave a lot of the original out of it. I dont know why as the original is the one that made it famous.
1 person likes this
• Philippines
14 May 08
My thoughts exactly. Have you read the book. The first film was nearest to the book but at the time of the making lack the special effects to do the flying elevator.
1 person likes this
@mcrowl (1050)
• New Zealand
12 Sep 09
I've seen the original a couple of times, and the Johnny Depp version just the once. Certainly Depp seems creepier, and intentionally lacks any warmth, which makes the whole film just a bit unpleasant. I don't like all the Oompa Loompas being played by the same person in the second version. It's clever, but doesn't do anything for the film. When the second version came out, I wrote an article asking what had happened to the children from the original version. It's been one of the most popular articles I've ever had published on the Net, to my surprise! http://cinemaroll.com/fantasy/where-are-the-willy-wonka-children/
@Fortunata (1135)
• United States
4 Jan 09
I like the 1971 version. I have yet to watch the new one with Johnny Depp. It looked to me from the movie trailers that it would be darker and edgier than the original. I never read the book either, I just know the author was a strange guy married to Patricia Neal at one time. I like the 'teaching' songs that the Oompah Loompah sing, it's hilarious. I first saw this movie when I was a teenager going to a movie matinee with my cousins at the local Foxx theatre. By then it was already a couple of years old, and considered a 'sleeper' I guess, meaning it hadn't exactly caught fire with the movie going public. There were a couple of little girls sitting behind me that screamed when the Oompah Loompahs first appeared, so maybe it's scary to kids, I don't know. I remember my brother telling them to shut the hell up, lol. I just caught this movie again on TMC on tv and it's just as campy as I recall.
• United States
10 Jun 09
I prefer the original version. It's the one I grew up watching every once in a while - for one thing. For a second, it's so much lighter and happier, with such better musical numbers than CHARLIE and the Chocolate Factory. Not that the contemporary version of it isn't good - I liked the backstory of Willy Wonka's dad being a dentist who hated candy. I also liked how they included the original "squirrel and bad nuts" scene in the new version. But the old version has the best musical numbers - the most memorable, the most inspired and inspiring, and the most touching more often than not. Who can forget "Pure Imagination"?
• Philippines
16 Jul 10
I wasn't able to watch the 1971 version of this movie but I totally love the 2005 version. Johnny Depp is really the best. The boy who plays Charlie is so cute. The cinematography was also excellent. I wish there was such a chocolate factory in the world today. I was able to read the book before watching the movie and I was satisfied with how they made the movie.
• United States
28 Jun 08
I don't think the two should be compared. Their both really great films from very different points of view. The older one is great because I saw it as being way more lighthearted. Plus the new one is based on the book. And I think I prefer the old one's storyline more.
• Philippines
25 Sep 08
Hi Al_bobid! I haven't read the book but I did watch both versions. I personally liked the 1971 version, it showed a very simple yet poignant representation on how the simple pleasure of a chocolate bar was regarded as a luxury to someone poor. Even back then when they didn't have all those computer technologies the movie was able to create a real believable fantasy place. I remember how I felt when I first saw the movie, I was like Gosh I want one of those giant gummy bears **drool**! Aside from that I just loved the original oompa loompas they were really talented. The movie overall was very charming and fed your inner child's wildest fantasies. The 2005 version was also good but it did not come even close to the original one. This version had a bit of an eerie touch, Johnny Depp's portrayal of Willy Wonka was a bit like a loose nutcase, watching the movie made me feel like I was watching some kind of thriller movie. Especially when the kids were taken by those creepy oompa loompas (which I just learned was only one guy who was multiplied by computer magic). lol. This version was a more mature twist than the original.