which need more ENERGY? FOOTBALL or TENNIS?
By engrzia
@engrzia (1020)
South Korea
11 responses
@naresh1977 (25)
• India
5 Nov 06
I think more calories would burn while you play football where you need to run continuously.
@engrzia (1020)
• South Korea
5 Nov 06
well.. good point sir.. but if we average the cover area even then tennis seem more tideous. but someone having experience of both can give better idea.... I have experience of football. Its realllly tough compared to hockey, cricket. but of tennis i just played few times practice match. anywyas thanks..
@engrzia (1020)
• South Korea
5 Nov 06
yummm... football is now getting more votes... I am recalling from my experience that those games played by foot or legs are much tideous than those involve urs hand or head etc. But somebody having much experience of both games can give better idea... thx for reply.
@jade17901 (597)
• United States
5 Nov 06
Im gonna say football, but I really dont know! Thats a hard question
@gamerz_84 (918)
• India
5 Nov 06
yeah i agree with u.tennis is a single players game.n involves continuous runnin n volleying so much more energy is required
@highlyspirited (874)
• India
5 Nov 06
It is again relative. it depend on the size and capacity of the person who is playing these games.......
@devilangelo (4522)
• India
5 Nov 06
i think its football . u have to run around quite a large field ..