Tiny Tablet Provides Proof for Old Testament
By WhatsHerName
@WhatsHerName (2716)
United States
May 1, 2008 12:18am CST
Tiny tablet provides proof for Old Testament
By Nigel Reynolds, Arts Correspondent
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1557124/Tiny-tablet-provides-proof-for-Old-Testament.html
The sound of unbridled joy seldom breaks the quiet of the British Museum's great Arched Room, which holds its collection of 130,000 Assyrian cuneiform tablets, dating back 5,000 years.
A fragment of cuneiform - Tiny tablet provides proof for Old Testament
This fragment is a receipt for payment made by a figure in the Old Testament
But Michael Jursa, a visiting professor from Vienna, let out such a cry last Thursday. He had made what has been called the most important find in Biblical archaeology for 100 years, a discovery that supports the view that the historical books of the Old Testament are based on fact.
Searching for Babylonian financial accounts among the tablets, Prof Jursa suddenly came across a name he half remembered - Nabu-sharrussu-ukin, described there in a hand 2,500 years old, as "the chief eunuch" of Nebuchadnezzar II, king of Babylon.
Prof Jursa, an Assyriologist, checked the Old Testament and there in chapter 39 of the Book of Jeremiah, he found, spelled differently, the same name - Nebo-Sarsekim.
Article continues
advertisement
Nebo-Sarsekim, according to Jeremiah, was Nebuchadnezzar II's "chief officer" and was with him at the siege of Jerusalem in 587 BC, when the Babylonians overran the city.
The small tablet, the size of "a packet of 10 cigarettes" according to Irving Finkel, a British Museum expert, is a bill of receipt acknowledging Nabu-sharrussu-ukin's payment of 0.75 kg of gold to a temple in Babylon.
The tablet is dated to the 10th year of the reign of Nebuchadnezzar II, 595BC, 12 years before the siege of Jerusalem.
"This is a fantastic discovery, a world-class find," Dr Finkel said yesterday. "If Nebo-Sarsekim existed, which other lesser figures in the Old Testament existed? A throwaway detail in the Old Testament turns out to be accurate and true. I think that it means that the whole of the narrative [of Jeremiah] takes on a new kind of power."
Cuneiform is the oldest known form of writing and was commonly used in the Middle East between 3,200 BC and the second century AD. It was created by pressing a wedge-shaped instrument, usually a cut reed, into moist clay.
1 person likes this
3 responses
@flowerchilde (12529)
• United States
6 Jun 08
..scholars have scoffed at other historical things mentioned in the bible.. only to find archaeological evidence later.. This was very interesting! It's kind of funny how many people think the bible was written by a bunch of old men sitting around a table, manufacturing and imagining the historical accounts..
@WhatsHerName (2716)
• United States
6 Jun 08
Lol, yeah and they think that some man or men came along and changed it all up, fooling not only the millions of people who were reading it at the time and fooling God.
1 person likes this
@Harley009 (1416)
• India
29 May 08
Oh there are proofs for Old testament! Thats why Christians bundle it with Bible without believe what is written in it.
Who said Christians don't believe Old testament? huh?
Who said Christians are to believe Old testament?