BCS
By EricBigNally
@EricBigNally (5)
United States
November 1, 2006 9:02pm CST
What are your thoughts on how the National Championship in college football currently is decided. On one hand, you reward a team for winning their games and scheduling some tough teams. On the other, there are usually several very talented teams that could be deserving left out of the shot at the title. Is the system fine, should there be some "tweaks," or should there be at least some sort of a playoff were several teams have a shot at it.
2 responses
@EricBigNally (5)
• United States
2 Nov 06
The more you guys hang out with me the more little quirks of information you will pick up on some weird topics. This is a topic that I get quite defensive over. I hate the way the bowls are done. There should be a playoff with a certain number of teams to play for several weeks in a row. This is more fair and gives a more equal opportunity for someone to win the title. On top of that, one of the polls used in configuring the BCS standings isn't even taken that seriously by the coaches that put it together. They either take little time in filling it out or just have a graduate assistant take care of. IF they keep the bowls, then there needs to be a change in the configuring of the BCS standings.
