Why do people still support Animal Righs ideology after this?

Tweet

I can't believe people still don't know about it but it seems they don't. http://www.petakillsanimals.com/petaTrial2.cfm Yes. PETA one of the many animal rights organisaions failed to rehome animals they were given and acually euthanised them. A multi million dollar organisation cannot find the resources to care for anmals until they are rehomed. Even organisations like the RSPCA in the uk do the same; euthanising around 100 000 animals a year. Both use vast financial resources on cmpaigns against things like fur, pedigree breeding, foxhunting, greyhound racing etc yet do this. In addition, the ideological roots of Animal Rights lies in Nazism. Heinrich Himmler coind the phrase, and the Nazis for example banned cooking of lobsters and foxhunting; http://www.kaltio.fi/index.php?494 Modern animal rights organisations are no less sinister. Some of these quotes from animal rights leaders are apalling: http://www.animalrights.net/quotes.html what should frighten every animal lover is that they all share the idea of the eventual elimination of domestic animals. That means dogs cats and horses aswell as chickens and sheep and cows. The idea is that animals are better off being exterminated than being "used" by man, so the PETA killings should not surprise anyone. They are not animal lovers but people haters; and the frightening way they take the moral high ground to justify themselves has parallels with the Nazis. On the other side, they have some well dodgy financial motivations and support; and because they are such powerful advertisers, the media are afraid to say anything bad about them. IFAW for example are often seen as a "good" organisaion for animals yet the World Conservation Union (IUCN)consistently refuse them access as their ideas are based on animal righs ideology which conflicts with the best Conservation ideology: the idea of sustainable and traditional animal use being the least dangerous economic activity for humans. Synthtics and intensive arable crops for example are far worse in the long run as they are so destructive to habitat. One only has to look at the vast Sami reindeer herds and fur trade yet the way their wilderness is unchanged for thousands of years to know that is true. Back to finances. Check this out: http://www.activistcash.com/organization_overview.cfm/oid/136 That is the HSUS but you can check out PETA and IFAW there too. And also many Animal rights organisations rely on propaganda they are not above staging: http://www.furcommission.com/news/newsC7.htm Of course what happens is that so many urban people, particularly urban youth, have little knowledge of nature, food and fur production etc. so believe much of the false propaganda. Because young musicians are basically concerned about animals and and publicity, PETA for example have been able to use them to get their message across to gullible youth. So. Again I draw your attention to this; http://www.petakillsanimals.com/petaTrial2.cfm please now if you have any real interest in animals help expose animal Rights groups like peTa by pasing that on. But my question is simply: how on earth when all this is now known do people still continue to support them?